You're using words like "infiltrate".
Allow me to provide a different perspective: People are becoming aware of how there are some deeply embedded problems in the general narratives of how we have spoken about one another, how we have treated one another. At a systematic level.
It's one thing to say "Racism bad", it's another thing altogether to ask, how did we get here where this thing called "racism" exists. And it's not as simple as "people have always been prejudiced". Well, yeah, there have always been prejudices, but why these specific prejudices. Where did this idea of "white" come from? It didn't exist a thousand years ago, if you went back a thousand years in Europe you won't find "whiteness", you won't find these clear boundaries of "race". People recognized differences, an Ethiopian was dark, for example, and the term "black" could be used. People recognized that there were tribes, nations (ethnicities), and the term "race" could be applied to ethnic groups. But when we look at the history of race and racism, in the context of American history, or in the broader context of Western European history going back a few centuries, we see emerging ideas, emerging concepts. The ways in which dominant peoples excused suppressing, dominating, and subjugating other peoples.
Why, for example, in spite of the fact that the Catholic Church, Catholic organizations (e.g. the Jesuits), condemn mistreatment of indigenous people and advocate for indigenous rights; and even the Spanish crown (for example) employing laws which condemned colonial mistreatment of indigenous people--and yet we still have that subjugation of indigenous people by colonizers? And how have ideas and systems, beginning with colonization, which mistreated native populations, resulted in the shaping of the history of colonial powers.
How did America, beginning as a series of British colonies, come to behave the way it did--at a hierarchal and systematic way--in the mistreatment of certain persons? Why did post-colonial America find forced removal of native populations, and even the systematic murder (genocide) of indigenous American peoples something excusable?
I agree that there have been injustices and descrimination and use of power over people to deny their rights. We have to acknowledge that. But to see our entire history as Wokist do where everything comes down to oppressors and victims is the problem. Its the ideological underpinning that lurks behind the nobel cause that is brought in that is the problem.
You can tell the unreality of the ideology behind the nobel causes by how they pan out in society. For example Woke identity politics divides society into identity groups and highlights their differences. Fundementally that is in complete contradiction to equality and non descrimination by valuing and judging people by their differences. This pits groups against each other and causes conflicts which leads to anoemosity between people.
As we have been seeing different identity groups whether by race, ethnics, gender, sex or religion are attacking each other to the point of violents. The extreme expression of this ideology is how antisemetism which has resurfaced in modern democratic societies.
Any society that allows antisemetism to fester in our institutions and society is not in good health as far as the Western Truths we use to uphold like Dr King adovacted that a person was judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin, or sex, gender or the many other identies people have.
That's where "Critical Race Theory" comes into play: Studying the history, taking a critical look, at the how these things came to be, how it happened. How has "whiteness" as an idea evolved, in the colonial and post-colonial world. Why did, for example, Americans in the mid-19th century regard Irish Catholics (for example) as a racially inferior group. The Irish were not "white", even though, obviously, indigenous Irish people are fair-skinned--it was a lot more than just skin color. So a critical analysis of "whiteness" a critical analysis of "race", and how these--and many other things--have emerged, developed, and affected society not just at the bottom, but at systemic levels are valuable questions to pursue.
I don't know, but all this Critical analysis has resulted in an over extenuating and obsessing with every possible difference a human can have. The more intersecting identities of victimhood you have the more 'Clean" a person is. The more identities a person has with the percieved 'Unclean' identities of oppression such as being White and Male or having as a Colonialist or Slave holder the more you are unworthy.
Like I said this is dividing society and pitting people against each other. The opposite of equality. The ideas of Critical theories are dangerous and have no basis in fact or reality. They are based on certain assumpotions like Social Construction Theory where everything including reality itself is a social construction. And Postmodernism thinking where reality is self referential.
The idea of Critical thinking is different to the Critical Theories underpinning Woke or Identity politics. Critical thinking doesn't make any narrow assumptions about the world and infact looks at itself for bias. But as Woke ideology is like religious belief it sneaks in the assumptions about human nature and how the world and reality is ordered.
Take the Equity in DEI polcies. Equity as opposed to equality is about focuing on certain identity groups over others and priviledging them to equal society. THis is based on the assumption that all differences between humans is socially constructed and any difference is due to oppression. That is actually descrmination and promoting the very wrongs such as 'priviledge' that Woke condemns. It also destroys the long held Western truth principle of merit, competition, sacrifice and working hard to earn things.
THis is just a small example of how the new Woke or Identity politics of religion has infiltrated into society. The link I posted earlier may help understand how Identity politics works. Postmodermism also plays a role as this undermines that there are any Mata Truths or objective reality and makes 'Self' and identity as the determination of truth and how the world is.
If we want to understand why things are as they are, and if we say "being racist is bad", well why is there is this "racism" thing in the first place? Why is there this way of talking about "white people" as opposed to "black people" a thing? How have these concepts of "white" and "black" played a role in the history of the United States? What assumptions have we, because we are living in the culture, simply grown up with uncritically, just accepting as "the way things are".
I would imagine to a certain extent humans look at differences by nature. If we formed tribes even before any understanding of differences in a social sense then its instinctual to some extent. Maybe differences were more exentuated due to differ cultures mixing. Obviously if a bunch of white people come in ships to natives thats a pretty big culture shoch for all that brings attention to differences.
Times that by the many times people have mixed and we have a lot of differences and if people wanted to focus on those differences then it would exentuate them thus increasing the risk of exploiting or denegrating those differences. I would imagine thats human nature as well.
But all I know is that focusing and highlighting differences as Woke and identity politics do is not the answer as it actually makes it worse to the point of antisemetism. We need something that values humans just as humans regardless of their identity, the very opposite of Woke.
Yes we did some bad stuff in the past and we need to acknowledge this and do better. But the solution Woke and identity politics offers is not going to lead to some DEI Utopia but a dividied people tearing each other apart.
And then, ask yourself, why are there so many people mad at asking these questions? Why is there such a concerted effort to stomp out honest inquiry, to stomp out the asking of questions, why is the pursuit of critical historical analysis something being so deeply opposed by certain people in power?
Because Critical analysis is the Trojan Horse to sneak the ideology in. Nobel reasons are used to enforce the ideology. Its good to ask questions and critically analyse things, human behaviour, how societies organize themselves as to being fair and just. Thats a fundemental truth thanks to western ideas.
But that is not what is happening with Critical theories like Race, Queer and Social Justice. We can find evdience of how these ideas actually cause injustice and inequality.
Now ask yourself this, if "woke" means becoming aware of the deep and systematic problems of racial injustice; and if "woke" people want to dig deeper, below the surface, to understand history and seeking a critical analysis of this--why are these same people so opposed to genuine, sincere inquiry and the pursuit of understanding wanting to demean, attack, ridicule, and demonize "woke"?
I think the average person perhaps the silent majority do use critical and commonsense thinking. They know when somethings not fair or unjust regardless of identity. But what they don't like is when their identity attacked for just being themselves. They are not unconsciously racist and are against racism and treating others badly.
Woke has created an industry out of doing peoples thinking by injecting their own ideology onto people. Their assumptions about human nature and the world. That everything comes down to oppressor and victim mentaly and a persons worth if the differences they identify with.
What do you think might be their motivations? What could people in power gain by silencing criticism and inquiry? And if you ask yourself that, and if you are honest with yourself about that, then you'll probably end up becoming "woke" yourself.
I think modern society being so PC over the last couple of decades has had so many inquiries, studies, research, conversations on breaking down the reasons who humans and societies do what they do that we are very 'WOKE' as in the old meaning of the word. Certainly those in positions of influence.
But that seems to be the problem. Like I said the new version of WOKE has been coopted into a different things. Whatever the thinking behind todays Woke is what it does well is take Nobel ideas like the original Woke, or in the name of Protection and uses that to attached the ideology to. That is just like the church use to do in oppressing people while preaching.
Because when people in power have their power challenged the best way to deflect criticism and investigation is to point the finger at a group, and say "those people are dangerous". And if you think that's a far-fetched idea, then perhaps you should spend more time reading history books.
The problem is this is also exactly what those are doing who are accusing other groups of pointing the finger. ie certain identity groups are pointed out as being 'unclean' trouble makers, oppressors, the bad skins who must be exposed and stopped even destroyed. We seen this with the tearing down of all the icons of the West with statuse of Washington, and other important figures.
So it seems Wokist see themselves in the very people they call oppressors which is not the best way to overcome oppression by doing the same thing as the oppressors.
Want to know a famous example of that happening? Just look at the first state-sponsored persecution of Christians under Nero. That's exactly what happened. Nero was hated, despised, how did Nero deflect? He pointed the finger at a new minority religious group: Christians. When Rome burned, he blamed the fire on us; and then he had us put to death, he had us hung on crosses, he had the Apostle Paul beheaded, he had St. Peter crucified, he took us and covered us in tar and lit us on fire to light his imperial gardens.
This sounds very similar to the antisemetism that has brewed by due to Wokism and identity politics. Several States are sponoring Hamas who represent a minority group against another minority group. This has more or less sent the message that its ok to descriminate and attack Jews all over the world and where antisemetism has resurfaced after we fought so hard to rid ourselves of it.
So wherever policies the Critical theories that underpin Woke and IP its not working. Its actually creating the very world they claim to want to prevent.
More recently, just look at the Nazis, and all the different people they scapegoated, especially the Jews, resulting in the extermination of over 6 million Jewish men, women, and children. But also who else did they scapegoat? Communists, socialists, Roma, the handicapped, homosexuals, religious minorities, and anyone who dared to question and speak out against them.
Honestly I did not see this part of your post when I spoke of the Jews above. Therefore if antisemetism has resurfaced and is even being promoted in this new secular religion of Woke what does that tell you about what Woke and identity politics is actually about. You can tell the merits of an idea or belief by the fruits it bears and Woke is not bearing good fruits but division, conflict and chaos.
And if you think, "Well, America isn't Nero's Rome or Hitler's Germany", then you're not paying attention to history, nor learning the lessons thereof. Because "
It can't happen here" is ignorance of the dangers which we have seen happen again and again.
Wait a minute doesn't the US have a ruling party that supports all the ideas of Wokism and identity politics. They even use Critical theory to underpin their policies and Laws. But like I said thats the very problem. The same thing is happening in Canada, Britain, Australia and NZ to a lesser extent.
Want to understand "woke", then understand this: It could happen here, unless we are vigilant. Otherwise, "When fascism comes to America it will come carrying the flag and a cross".
Where is here. I'm in Australia. What I find fascinating is how two people can have completely opposing views and beliefs while both believing they they facts and truth. This shows how polaring this issue is that its producing polar opposite views. Usually there would be a large common ground of agreement in politics and culture.
So in saying that what you think could happen ehere wherever that is I think the opposite has already happened in most western nations. Which is Woke and Identity politics and the long march from the institutions into society has arrived.