What catches my attention is that Archer testified to the committee that he had no knowledge of any corruption by Joe Biden. So, he either lied to the committee, which would be perjury (even though he wasn't technically under oath he can still be held in contempt for lying to the committee), or, when he had no risk of committing a crime, lied to the media to continue this apparently false narrative that the Right keeps pushing with no actual evidence.
The continued misrepresentation and absolute gaslighting of the public about Mr. Archer's testimony and the official actions of President Biden while he was VP with regard to Shokin is just bizarre. We can all read what Archer actually said. The actions of the VP and the U.S. government and the IMF, et. al. involved are all a matter of historical record. The 20 calls? No business was discussed. They talked about the weather. The Dinners? They were about foundations and social programs supported by the U.S. government and Biden was at those dinners in that capacity. Archer never claimed that any business was discussed at those dinners. One he recounted Joe Biden didn't even sit down the whole time and was only there for a short period of time.
All those payments they want to highlight? Those were to Hunter as part of his business dealings. Investigate them to the moon and back. Charge him if he committed crimes, but we're not talking about impeaching Hunter, though, are we?
They have nothing. And they know they have nothing, but they can't drop it now. The right would lose its collective mind.
