"
God's sacrifice in the Garden, at the very least then reveals the legitimacy of animal sacrifice for human benefit. Abel, a keeper of sheep, understood how to make an acceptable sacrifice using animals (
Gen 4:3-4). Why was Abel a keeper of sheep? For what purpose? Perhaps to eat? Moreover, the description of Abel's sacrifice is instructive. Notice the phrase, "and of their fat portions" (
Gen 4:4). This is similar to the peace offerings offered later where the "fat" was burned and the meat was eaten (
Lev 3:9). Cain offered a grain offering. Later in the Old Testament we learn that grain offerings were accompanied by peace offerings (
Lev. 3;
6:14-23). So, in Genesis 4 we may be observing the first coupling of peace and grain offerings. If so, then part of the offering may have been eaten by man.
Jabal, was the father of those who had livestock (
Gen 4:20). Were any of these animals used in sacrifices? Were they used for meals? The Bible does not say. Noah received a special command by God to take 7 pairs of each clean animal upon the Ark (
Gen 7:2-3). Clean animals were used for sacrifices. After the flood Noah offered an acceptable sacrifice to God (
Gen 8:20-21). How did Noah know how to make an acceptable sacrifice? Did he just continue the practice from Abel? (
Gen 4:3-4). Clearly, there was at least two animal sacrifices after the Fall and before the Flood; and probably several others.
It is important to note that many animal sacrifices in the Old Testament were often accompanied by a meal; God's portion was offered upon the altar and the worshipper's portion was consumed in a meal. Some covenants were confirmed with sacrifices, followed by meals (
Gen 26:28-31;
31:54;
Exod 24:3-11). Peace offerings (compare Abel's sacrifice,
Gen 4:3-4) involved community meals (
Lev 7:11-38;
Deut 12:6-7;
27:7, etc.). Such meals and sacrifices were held at important points in Israel's history (
Deut 27:7;
1 Chron 16:1-3;
2 Chron 7:1-10, etc.). And Paul compares the Lord's Supper to these sacrificial meals (
1 Cor 10:16-21). Though the Mosaic Law was not officially given until Moses (
Rom 5:13-14) and the Bible is silent on the issue, the fact that peace offering accompanied with meals remains a very real possibility in the society prior to Noah (
Rom 2:14-15).
Some argue that Adam was given specific instructions in the Garden to only eat vegetation and not meat. They quote:
Genesis 1:29-30 And God said, "Behold, I have given you
every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and
every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on.
Does this affirm that Adam and Eve were merely vegetarians? Not necessarily. The text only states the positive command that man could eat vegetation; it does not explicitly forbid the eating of meat. So, while the text does dictate that man may eat vegetation it does not outlaw the eating of meat. Rather than establishing a diet for the Garden, with the repeated use of "every,"
Genesis 1:29-30 may just be laying the groundwork for God's command not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (
Gen 2:16-17).
Others continue the argument and state that the first animals were eaten in obedience to
Genesis 9:1-4. The text says:
And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the heavens, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea. Into your hand they are delivered. Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything. But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.
Genesis 9:1-3 is a re-issuing of the original lordship command given to Adam; even the "blessing" to "be fruitful and and multiply" (
Gen 9:1,
7) is divinely similar to
Genesis 1:28. The 'beasts of the earth, birds of the heaven, and fish of the sea' of
Genesis 9:1-3 are all mentioned in
Genesis 1:20-26,
28-30. So, we witness a re-creation or a renewal in
Genesis 9:1-3. As John Gill wrote:
This is a renewal, at least in part, of the grant of dominion to Adam over all the creatures; these obeyed him cheerfully, and from love, but sinning, he in a good measure lost his power over them, they rebelled against him; but now though the charter of power over them is renewed, they do not serve man freely, but are in dread of him, and flee from him.
So, as
Genesis 9:1-3 is not speaking of a brand new creation, but rather a renewal, so is it not necessarily speaking of a new command that man can eat animals, whom he already had full dominion over (
Gen 1:26;
2:20). So,
Genesis 9:1-3 is not necessarily a new permission to eat meat; especially seeing that meals involving the eating of meat may have accompanied earlier sacrifices after the Fall. However, there was definitely a new prohibition not to eat meat mingled with blood (
Gen 9:4).
So,
Genesis 9:1-3 refers to re-Creation. God adds the command not to eat meat with blood (
Gen 9:4), Why? Because life is in the blood (
Lev 17:11; cf.
Gen 9:5-6). This reinforces the message implicit in all sacrifices; that redemption from sin would be "with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot" (
1 Pet 1:19-20;
Gen 3:15;
21;
John 1:29;
Rom 3:25:
1 Cor 5:7;
1 Pet 1:2)."
Did man eat meat before the Fall and the Flood?
thirdmill.org