Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What indicates it has been buried?
Why is Trump's theft of classified material a mere distraction?
The choice of the MSM to focus on distractions, such as "Trump's nuclear documents!"![]()
The Supreme Court's answer to inquiries has been, "No comment."
With so very few people who could have been the leaker, and they can't even narrow it down among those very few, it's no surprise they wouldn't want to comment.
Yes, due to his personal items like passport etc, being mixed in. If he didn't pack them, he went thru them later and was well aware.
Why is an accusation enough for you to accept it as a fact?
What does that have to do with my comment:It bodes well for Republicans if Trump cannot run again and he is taken off the ballot without angering the base.
You and the small minority of Americans who are so far gone you still believe Trump’s insane lies. He’s lost a tremendous amount of support and continues to (he lost a few more just yesterday with his manic social media posts).
You’re hanging on to a sinking ship. You’re defending someone the rest of the world recognizes as a mentally ill, criminal cult leader. Do you really want to keep holding on?
Yeah, but what you are not understanding is that the FBI raided Trump, therefore there is a need to smear the credibility of the FBI.I'd like to know where the evidence is that the FBI "leaked" this? The Rolling Stone article states, "Specifically, Trump has bragged to some of his closest associates — both during and after his time in the White House — that he knew illicit details about the love life of French President Emmanuel Macron, two people with knowledge of the matter tell Rolling Stone." That doesn't really point to the FBI
I did a Ctri+F word search on both the warrant and affidavit, and “President of France" is not written in either of them. I'm not saying it wasn't made public. I've just been saying that info is not in the warrant or affidavit.Sigh. It says “President of France."
Again, you know it was made public and wasn’t leaked.
Can you post the complete text of all the documents in question? If not, what evidence are you looking at to come to this conclusion?Yes, yes, let's deflect away from the "nuclear documents" being nothing of the sort
Like having his lawyer acknowledge that they've looked and returned all of the documents in question, while at the same time keeping boxes of them?Does that involve intent?
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22131403/fbiwarrant.pdf, page 6 of the PDF, line 1A under "Description of item(s)"I did a Ctri+F word search on both the warrant and affidavit, and “President of France" is not written in either of them.
You're making his case for him.Like having his lawyer acknowledge that they've looked and returned all of the documents in question, while at the same time keeping boxes of them?