• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How to prove that GOD exists from a scientific point of view?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Agreed. The Bible is not a textbook for anything technical in the slightest. If anything it's got some good stuff that explains how people function.

Very inefficient way of transmitting the same sort of folk
wisdom that is daily currency here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Opdrey
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,679
16,363
55
USA
✟411,567.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Yup ... it's called the long axis.

The Bible gives the circumference (30) and the long axis (10), but does not give the short axis (9.0763[something]) since there's no need to.

Now you're inventing precision. The original is only precise to 1 digit. 1.x10^1 cubits across and 3.x10^1 cubits around are compatible with pi and circularity. This is just basic measurement theory.

Pi has nothing to do with it.

Of course it does. The formula for the circumference of an ellipse *also* includes pi. (A circle is just an ellipse with two equal axes.)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Of course it does. The formula for the circumference of an ellipse *also* includes pi. (A circle is just an ellipse with two equal axes.)
But only if the long axis and the short axis are the same, right?

Then you have a true circle.
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Now you're inventing precision. The original is only precise to 1 digit. 1.x10^1 cubits across and 3.x10^1 cubits around are compatible with pi and circularity. This is just basic measurement theory.



Of course it does. The formula for the circumference of an ellipse *also* includes pi. (A circle is just an ellipse with two equal axes.)
Anything to avoid approximation errors.
As if there was ever an exact cubit or way to measure it.
 
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
  • Informative
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Anything to avoid approximation errors.
As if there was ever an exact cubit or way to measure it.

My favorite was the distance from the elbow to the hand. Makes me wonder if the ancients had a "standard forearm" stored somewhere. :)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Anything to avoid approximation errors.
I don't consider listing two parameters of an ellipse out of three solving an approximation error.

In fact, if I had to guess, I'd say it would even be on geometry tests.

TEST QUESTION: What is the short axis of an ellipse, if the circumference is 30, and the long axis is 10?

(Round off to the nearest 100th.)
Estrid said:
As if there was ever an exact cubit or way to measure it.
I'm sure there was. Probably the length from the tip of Noah's middle finger to his elbow, then simply standardized for future use.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Makes me wonder if the ancients had a "standard forearm" stored somewhere. :)
That's cute.

Do you guys ever think this stuff through?

Establish a length, then preserve it with a piece of string, a strap of leather, a board, length of stone, metal bar, or whatever.

Imperial_Standards_of_Length%2C_Greenwich.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
That's cute.

Do you guys ever think this stuff through?

Why do you think I wrote it?

Establish a length, then preserve it with a piece of string, a strap of leather, a board, length of stone, metal bar, or whatever.

You DO realize that there are technical preserved and calibrated standards for metric units, correct? And that even things like "seconds" are calibrated to features of atomic vibration.
 
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I don't consider listing two parameters of an ellipse out of three solving an approximation error.

Are you familiar with "significant digits"?

(Round off to the nearest 100th.)

There ya go! If you round Pi to 1 significant digit it is 3. Nothing too terribly hard about that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You DO realize that there are technical preserved and calibrated standards for metric units, correct? And that even things like "seconds" are calibrated to features of atomic vibration.
I do indeed.

And if we can use something to standardize weights and measures, do you think they could too?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you familiar with "significant digits"?
No.
Odprey said:
There ya go! If you round Pi to 1 significant digit it is 3. Nothing too terribly hard about that.
Um ... I didn't say round Pi off to its nearest digit.

I said round the short axis off to the nearest digit.
 
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I do indeed.

And if we can use something to standardize weights and measures, do you think they could too?

Probably not, to be quite honest.

Especially if one uses the idea of a cubit being the same cubit as used by the Sumerians, Egyptians and Israelites which was the length of the elbow to the tip of the fingers.
 
Upvote 0

Opdrey

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2022
833
546
61
Oregon
✟13,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married

Might help you quite a bit in this case.

Um ... I didn't say round Pi off to its nearest digit.

But you did mention something being rounded to the nearest hundredths and that's an example of how significant digits operate (there's a lot more about significant digits than just that buy you were on track)

Does it ever alter your position on thing when you find out you didn't know something?

Instead of trying to exegete the bible into saying something is round all about is actually an ellipse, why not just assume that it was a rounding issue?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Probably not, to be quite honest.
Then why did God demand it?

Deuteronomy 25:15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Opdrey said:
Especially if one uses the idea of a cubit being the same cubit as used by the Sumerians, Egyptians and Israelites which was the length of the elbow to the tip of the fingers.
Noah came before they did.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Then why did God demand it?

Deuteronomy 25:15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be lengthened in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.


Assuming Deuteronomy is a legitimate book, those were instructions for the priestly class of Israel, whom must be perfect physical specimens if they were to approach God's altar.

The early Hebrews were sticklers for physical and racial purity, after all -- a habit which would come back to bite them a few thousand years later...
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,655
52,517
Guam
✟5,130,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Assuming Deuteronomy is a legitimate book, those were instructions for the priestly class of Israel, whom must be perfect physical specimens if they were to approach God's altar.
And how did they accomplish this, if everyone's arms weren't the same length?
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
And how did they accomplish this, if everyone's arms weren't the same length?

I'm sure their arms were the same length -- their left arms had better be the same length as their right arms, or they'd be too flawed to be in the presence of God.

Leviticus 21:18 covered this, but it would make sense for Deuteronomy to go into more details, considering its origins and patronage...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.