LightLoveHope
Jesus leads us to life
- Oct 6, 2018
- 1,475
- 458
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
So what capacity do we have to independently verify this James Webb telescope, this JWT? Broadcast vision? Can we do a bit better than that please?
For instance, last time someone asked for the Apollo 11 validation, they were told 'We destroyed the tech, lost the telemetry and accidentally taped over the footage.' Don't know about you, but I find that less than inspiring of confidence in what you'd have to say is a fairly bold claim.
James Web Telescope is as valid as Hubble. Hubble has changed the way cosmologists see the universe. All round the world in every astronomy department the research and pictures has had an affect. It is not a bold claim to suggest these things are real, it is a ludicrous and absurd notion to suggest this world accept reality is made up. It is like saying seeing the moon through binoculars is an illusion created by aliens who create images in our heads while looking through the binoculars. If anyones world view means they have to do this, they have a serious delusion or need to believe in the absurd.
The research about the speed with which stars rotate around the centre of the milky way galaxy is mind blowing. The images we can see through these instruments does not mean the interpretations are correct, but they are discovering something new and asks us to question what is real and what is not.
For instance the thwaites glacier and its slow breaking up will affect all our lives, possible world history.
To be able to say 30 years or 5 years matters. And part of this measurement is satellites going round the poles taking pictures, which is only possible with a round earth. I find these issues critical because they affect me and my children and their futures.
Upvote
0