Thats not systemic racism.Sometimes, when they commit crimes against other rich people, other times they get far lighter sentences than poor people would.
Upvote
0
Thats not systemic racism.Sometimes, when they commit crimes against other rich people, other times they get far lighter sentences than poor people would.
Verses the multitudes of good police actions.And sometimes the not so good ones group up and get rid of the good ones and commit crimes together. Remember the rampart scandal and the Compton police department that was so corrupt it was disbanded.
What does that mean? Give me some examples.
Thats not systemic racism.
No, it's not systemic racism and you haven't shared any credible examples of modern systemic racism.But it does point to systemic problems and if class based systemic problems exist it's not much of a leap to race based systemic problems existing.
By liberals.
Do you feel that the discrimination against Asians in college admissions isYou won't get an answer unless you can solidly define the term 'systemic racism'. Some people seem to think that it means that there have to be laws that specifically and explicitly discriminate against certain races.
Nobody has time to look at an hour long video, we come here to have a back and forth discussion. You can't have a discussion with a video. Care to answer the question in your own words?Ok, 3 times now, try watching the video.
No because not all races are in the same economical class. BTW redlining was outlawed half a century ago; I think the discussion is about today.Racial and class issues are interlinked especially when you factor in redlining.
When people in the system break the laws of the system to impose their individual bias, that is an example of individual racism, not systemic racism.A system that is executed by people with individual bias is a bias system unless something is done to counter act that bias.
You not noticing it doesn't mean it isn't happenning. Frankly, it likely lends a LOT of creedence to the idea that it IS getting minimized.... whatever it is that is being discussedI See nothing minimizing anything. So you don't think we should eat a Thanksgiving meal?
Disproportionaly commit the crime you disproportionaly do the time.
I don't do links. I'm here, you're here let's discuss it here. A brief paragraph or 2 might inform me enough that I might want to read more.
That I'm certain doesn't address the endless screed that every facet of everything in the U.S. is systemically racist including roads, bridges etc.
Black americans go to prison because they commit crime. Its true that black Americans disproportionately go to prison but thats not because of racism. Its because they disproportionately commit more crime.
Thats not systemic racism.
Fair enough. Accounting for other factors in general when a white kid is stopped for a crime and a black kid is stopped for a crime if the crimes are roughly the same (eg drug selling) the black kid will statistically be more likely to have a worse outcome than a white kid. You can read the studies for the nitty gritty statistical details but that's essentially it. And there isn't just one study that finds this. It is found over and over again.
Using your drug example, while true whites do sell drugs more often than blacks but get arrested less often, the reason is because in many black neighborhoods there is a culture of selling drugs in the open or even on street corners where it is easy for the cops to catch them; and whites have a culture of selling their drugs in private homes to people they know making it more difficult for the cops to catch them. This is not an example of racism, it’s an example of different cultures resulting in different results.Fair enough. Accounting for other factors in general when a white kid is stopped for a crime and a black kid is stopped for a crime if the crimes are roughly the same (eg drug selling) the black kid will statistically be more likely to have a worse outcome than a white kid. You can read the studies for the nitty gritty statistical details but that's essentially it. And there isn't just one study that finds this. It is found over and over again.
so a study creates a hypothesis, proves it, and this is evidence of something nefarious apparently?"the studies"
"Studies" are famous for showing whatever they set out
to show.
Now, if there are sets of otherwise essentially identical cases that
show that one group gets shafted, terrif.
Where is it.