• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Modern day systemic racism, does it exist?

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,095
14,249
Earth
✟254,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
You seem to struggle with challenging your preconceptions.
We have outcomes that are worse for those who are BIPOC.
Arguing that that is because of anything but racism, misses the point whilst proving it at the same time.

Congratulations, it’s rare to see such unintentional honesty!
 
Upvote 0

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,428
3,834
Moe's Tavern
✟200,465.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
We have outcomes that are worse for those who are BIPOC.


That isn't in dispute. Why outcomes are worse for those who are BIPOC is what's in dispute.



Arguing that that is because of anything but racism,




That wasn't my argument. My argument is it could be racism, but it could be other reasons.

Your argument seems to be it can't be anything but racism.





misses the point whilst proving it at the same time.



What was the point? I though it was that BIPOC have worse outcomes because of systemic racism. A claim that you has yet to proven.




Congratulations, it’s rare to see such unintentional honesty!


"it’s rare to see such unintentional honesty!" Implying that I'm being dishonest most of the time. Do you have anything else to add to the debate beside an ad hominem?
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,791
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,858.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Russell Vought steers the Trumpified CFPB in a regressive direction

[During Trump 1.0,] the Republican president appointed Kathleen Kraninger to run the consumer bureau, and she brought a case against a Chicago-based lender that was accused of racially discriminatory practices. The effort succeeded, and the lender ultimately agreed to a settlement after losing a court fight.

[During Trump 2.0, the CFPB] is seeking to give back $105,000 that a mortgage lender paid to settle racial discrimination claims last fall.

Christine Chen Zinner, a senior lawyer at Americans for Financial Reform, a progressive advocacy group, told the Times that the consumer bureau’s attempt to overturn the settlement is “bananacakes.”
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It’s painful to see this thread still going after nearly four years, but with the broadened perspective that time has given us, I have more to say on this topic.

The term “systemic racism” entered the common lexicon in the early 2020’s as the BLM movement gained traction under a unique period of social unrest due both to Covid lockdowns and highly publicized cases of police brutality. Originally a term meant to describe nominally race-blind systems that consistently put minority races at a disadvantage, the term quickly became muddled as it was wielded by both sides of the political aisle as an example of how crazy the opposing sect sounded. On the Left it was a sign that our systems needed a full overhaul to protect racial equality (if only they could muscle past the racists protecting those systems), and on the Right it was a bunch of crazy leftists tilting at their latest boogeyman when clearly racism had been defeated decades prior.

As with most hot-button issues, the Left refused to eschew academic language for something more accessible while the Right oversimplified and spun it in their favor. The course of this thread since 2021 shows how even now we remain divided along party lines. The course of the political climate since then shows who was more effective.

Of course systemic racism exists. That’s like asking if evolution is true, if climate change is happening, or if the Earth is roughly spherical. The question is what’s to be done about it? How do we go about righting racial inequities that are baked into our society without doing similar injustice to another undeserving party?

Alright, that’s enough pretentious formality for one day.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,095
14,249
Earth
✟254,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
It’s painful to see this thread still going after nearly four years, but with the broadened perspective that time has given us, I have more to say on this topic.

The term “systemic racism” entered the common lexicon in the early 2020’s as the BLM movement gained traction under a unique period of social unrest due both to Covid lockdowns and highly publicized cases of police brutality. Originally a term meant to describe nominally race-blind systems that consistently put minority races at a disadvantage, the term quickly became muddled as it was wielded by both sides of the political aisle as an example of how crazy the opposing sect sounded. On the Left it was a sign that our systems needed a full overhaul to protect racial equality (if only they could muscle past the racists protecting those systems), and on the Right it was a bunch of crazy leftists tilting at their latest boogeyman when clearly racism had been defeated decades prior.

Yes, the fight about the fight was as far as we ever got.
As with most hot-button issues, the Left refused to eschew academic language for something more accessible while the Right oversimplified and spun it in their favor. The course of this thread since 2021 shows how even now we remain divided along party lines. The course of the political climate since then shows who was more effective.
The Right doesn’t want to have these conversations, (and we (again) fight about the fight).

Of course systemic racism exists. That’s like asking if evolution is true, if climate change is happening, or if the Earth is roughly spherical. The question is what’s to be done about it? How do we go about righting racial inequities that are baked into our society without doing similar injustice to another undeserving party?
Many still ascribe to the it’s anything but racism…(oh, let us just call it) “philosophy”.
We are not a cereal nation.


Alright, that’s enough pretentious formality for one day.
Speak for thyself, sir!
Good day!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaara4158
Upvote 0