Your link suggests that, here:
"Critical race theory says I'm a white supremacist," Toth told ABC affiliate KVUE in a recent interview. "Anyone that is not a person of color is a white supremacist. ... That's ridiculous."
Critical race theory in the classroom: Understanding the debate
But this is a guy who admittedly hasn't studied CRT, and opposes even admitting to public school students that institutional racism has harmed people in the United States.
As I said, hiding the truth from school children is a huge mistake.
Does redlining black neighborhoods for loans affect economic conditions for black people? It does.
Does punishing black students in schools more severely for the same offenses as white students harm them? It does.
Does targeting black motorists for stops, even thought the data show that white motorists are more likely to have contraband, produce fear and lack of respect for the law in black communities? Of course it does.
Does Gerrymandering districts to keep black voters from electing representative of their choice harm them? How could you say it doesn't?
Do these things affect chances of black citizens succeeding? How could anyone argue otherwise?
Now, the question is: "Is this something white people do this because they hate black people, or have these institutional practices persisted, without overt hatred?
I believe the latter is true, which is why CRT avoids focusing on racist attitudes, and concentrates on the way institutions lead to racist discrimination.
Which is why the relatively few genuine racists in America fear CRT; by focusing on the systems that build privilege and harm, rather than on perceived evil among groups of people, CRT can be a useful tool for ending institutional racism.