ID is not Creationism.So what is the evidence for Intelligent Design Creationism, and why do you continue to pretend that ID is not creationism?
Sure it is.ID is not Creationism.
You were trotting Piltdown out 2 years ago - nothing new in 2 years? The same hackneyed, tired, irrelevant quips when in a jam?would be Piltdown man
Name 10.Many scientists have remarked, on how curious it is, that the universe so lends itself to our understanding.
Yes yes, you claimed a while ago that:Dawkins again remarks on how 'uncannily similar' the machine code of DNA is to our own digital information systems. This did not cause our invention of digital information- but it helps us understand not just biological mechanisms, but how to advance our own information technology.
You can only put so much down to coincidence, at some point, when the die keeps rolling a 6, you have to suspect it is loaded, however profound the implications of that may be.
ID is Satan's cheap imitation for Creationism.Sure it is.
Bo DerekName 10.
And premised on just as much evidence as what you premise yours on.But Mohammad's beliefs, Jim Jones' beliefs, and Heaven's Gate were just as potent.
What is your evidence that Satan is a thing?ID is Satan's cheap imitation for Creationism.
And premised on just as much evidence as what you premise yours on.
Why don't you just do us both a favor and put me back on ignore? ThxWhat is your evidence that Satan is a thing?
By the way - I am remembering now why I had you on ignore for so long, so try not to be so tedious? Thx
For someone so devoted to empirical science and following the evidence to wherever it leads (as you imply), you sure are quick to abandon that framework when your Faith articles are in question. Instead of following the evidence, you - in a heart beat - employ logical fallacies like begging the question. Not impressive.Nature is the executor of God's laws as Galileo said.
Placing yourself in that group, eh? Interesting.Along with Lemaitre and Planck, I do not think it is a coincidence either,
Times change. Religions no longer have the stranglehold on society that they did in their times - at least among the successful scientists of today. I suspect that had Planck been born 100 years later, and been such a skeptic of atheism as you claim, he would rank right up there with Jon Sarfati and Jon Wells....that some of the greatest scientific breakthroughs came from noted skeptics of atheism.
Odd that the evidence did not point them to a literal bible. In fact, Planck once wrote:They were not restricted by such arbitrary tenets of materialism as you cite, but free to follow the evidence wherever it pointed
Will do - and thanks for your unwitting admission that all you can provide are assertions and bible stories.Why don't you just do us both a favor and put me back on ignore? Thx
It's a known norm, so yes, in that sense it's a law. Not like a traffic law.That is not what a scientific law is. A scientific law is a description of a phenomenon that has no as yet identified exceptions.
Do you actually think that a scientific law is like a, well, law? THAT is funny.
The divine proportionWhich rules are those?
Be specific and use examples, please.
In time you will forget again and remove the Ignore. I don't know whether it is age or optimism, but it seems to happen to many right thinking people.Will do - and thanks for your unwitting admission that all you can provide are assertions and bible stories.
So long!
Some people will say - that is a myth. And they'd be correct.The divine proportion
The petals of flowers -mostly- have perfect symmetry, similar to others in the nature as the shell of a snail, mineral crystals and even our galaxy.
At this symmetry it is called “divine proportion”, “golden ratio” or “golden number”. It is a recurring number in some patterns of nature and we can not believe it’s a fad or a fluke.
The Fibonacci spiral occurs in organisms from tiny to well, the entire galaxy.
And people will say " isn't nature amazing!". No, God is amazing for creating nature.
I would suggest that you could be even more confident that the coin is just biased. If it was a fair coin, you'd be exceptionally fortunate, and if it was a magic coin, you'd be in a different universe...
it is factinating the elements that is air we breatheits kinda strange really, it needed some sort of an intelligence to know theres air out there and to use it to carry things out of your body, but how could it know there was air, it sort of must have startet with some sort of an intelligence that wasnt really life yet but somehow knew everything still, perhaps it was just the thing that we`re all made up from, energy, some say it`s a little like something living, what do you think?