What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?

[renniks]

Who created the creator?

Well you can keep saying this Creator had a Creator and that Creator had a Creator and that Creator had a creator...forever and never get to the end... So you're still asking the same question.
You either have eternal matter or an eternal being, an energy source that created the matter.

 

[VirOptimus]

Well you can keep saying this Creator had a Creator and that Creator had a Creator and that Creator had a creator...forever and never get to the end... So you're still asking the same question.
You either have eternal matter or an eternal being, an energy source that created the matter.

No, we dont know that to be true at all.

 

[renniks]

No, we dont know that to be true at all.

Well, we could all be living on a piece of dandelion fluff, and everything we think we should see could be an illusion.
But barring that, I think we have to acknowledge that the universe most likely had a beginning.

 

[VirOptimus]

Well, we could all be living on a piece of dandelion fluff, and everything we think we should see could be an illusion.
But barring that, I think we have to acknowledge that the universe most likely had a beginning.

We know of the big bang yes.

 

[renniks]

We know of the big bang yes.

Can't have a bang without anything to go bang.

 

[VirOptimus]

Can't have a bang without anything to go bang.

There was no ”bang” in the big bang.

And we dont really know the details and we certainly dont know anything about before (if there even was a before).

 

[renniks]

There was no ”bang” in the big bang.

"I am the Lord that maketh all things, that stretcheth forth the heavens alone, that spreadeth abroad the earth by Myself;"

 

[VirOptimus]

"I am the Lord that maketh all things, that stretcheth forth the heavens alone, that spreadeth abroad the earth by Myself;"

That is a belief, not science.

 

[Speedwell]

Not in the real world.

Well, bring up some evidence for creationism and we'll see.

 

[Speedwell]

"I am the Lord that maketh all things, that stretcheth forth the heavens alone, that spreadeth abroad the earth by Myself;"

Amen. But what does that to do with the topic at hand--which is about the falsification of abiogenesis and evolution?

 

[VirOptimus]

Amen. But what does that to do with the topic at hand--which is about the falsification of abiogenesis and evolution?

He/she dont understand the difference between science and theology.

 

[Frank Robert]

Oh come on! People are people. There's scientists who have lost their careers for not supporting darwinism. If you think it's unbiased, you are dreaming.

What else did they have contribute to science besides anti-darwinism?

 

[renniks]

That is a belief, not science.

It's evidence that we were told about the heavens expanding long before scientists came up with the idea.

 

[VirOptimus]

It's evidence that we were told about the heavens expanding long before scientists came up with the idea.

No its not.

 

[renniks]

Amen. But what does that to do with the topic at hand--which is about the falsification of abiogenesis and evolution?

Heavens expanding...big bang.

 

[VirOptimus]

Heavens expanding...big bang.

Arent you a YEC?

 

[renniks]

Arent you a YEC?

Depends what day this is... is this Wednesday?

 

[VirOptimus]

Depends what day this is... is this Wednesday?

Yes, its Odins day.

 

[renniks]

Yes, its Odins day.

It's quite possible that an unspecified duration of time transpired between the creation of the universe (Genesis 1:1) and the initial formation of Earth. (Genesis 1:2).

The Hebrew verb translated “created” in Isaiah 42:5 is bara’ which has as its primary definition “bringing into existence something new, something that did not exist before.”7 The proclamation that God created (bara’) the entirety of the heavens is stated seven times in the Old Testament. (Genesis 1:1; 2:3; 2:4; Psalm 148:5; Isaiah 40:26; 42:5; 45:18).

 

[driewerf]

That word in your post I highlighted in red, did you mean "any," or "a"?

I started to write "The fact that you come up with an inane response ..." but estimated that "inane" was too rude, too aggressive and changed at the last moment for the slightly softer "nonsensical". So it was indeed meant as "a".