the persecution of Judge Moore ...
Judge Moore ... the pedophile ???
How did Science have anything to do with the "persecution" of Judge Moore ?
Your reaching is becoming destructive to your argument, I'm afraid ...
Upvote
0
the persecution of Judge Moore ...
But when mankind is ready to deny God, science is there to assist him in his defense of his decision.
Eve appealed to her empirical senses to override her obedience to God's command.
Genesis 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
"And when academians saw that Darwin's tree was convincing for evolution, and that it could be mapped out in a connect-the-dots format that was pleasant to the eyes, and a course to be desired to make themselves [Homo] sapiens, they did take of that course, and did give also to the Christians with them, and they did follow suit also."
That is empiricalism used against God's commandment.That's not Science ... that's self-gratification.
Then you need a new username.A_Thinker said:You're spinning ...
Here we go.A_Thinker said:Neither Egypt, nor Babylon, nor ...
And when I give one, you suddenly broaden the focus.I don't think that you'll find even one instance of the resistance to God which is portrayed in the Bible ... in any way aided and abetted by Science ...
The judge who was displaying the Ten Commandments.Judge Moore ... the pedophile ???
This is blatant spinning ... not really even worthy of consideration.It STARTED in the Garden of Eden, fueled by empirical science.
I think it is better to keep the Ten Commandments (i.e. keep your hands off of young girls) ... rather than to display them ...The judge who was displaying the Ten Commandments.
Atheism is a religion too, no?
The option that: 'There are no gods' doesn't easily turn into a parsimonious 'scientific explanation' without the objective test which would lead to that conclusion .. (but folk are free to adopt that belief if they choose to I suppose).
It is a form of worship, according to the Bible.No, it isn't.
It is a form of worship, according to the Bible.
Romans 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Worship, whether of "the creature" or anything else, is not a part of atheism.It is a form of worship, according to the Bible.
Romans 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Your future depends on It.Why should I care what your holy book says ...
"The creature," in this case, is creation (a.k.a., the universe).Worship, whether of "the creature" or anything else, is not a part of atheism.
Your future depends on It.
You are correct. My point still stands: atheists do not worship the universe."The creature," in this case, is creation (a.k.a., the universe).
It is enounced: cree-ay-chur -- not: cree-chur.
Bad so called fraudulent phony so called science is that which uses preconceptions and beliefs to hatch God opposing truth.So bad science is the science that disagrees with your preconceived ideas.
The error is that it is a bunch of beliefs and attitude and making stuff up to fit their godless contrived paradigm. To call that science is error.You can't actually point out any errors in it, all you can do is claim it's satanic and evil.
The proof is in the pudding. One can read the fables and stories and claims of false science and compare them with what the Almighty said! If they agreed, rather than directly contradict and oppose Scripture, well we would not suspect some different inspiration!And when asked for evidence to support your counterclaims, all you can do is say, "You can't prove I'm wrong!"
It's not Science front and center ... it's people front and center.
Recall that you believe that God brought the flood upon a very technically primitive world.
Neither Egypt, nor Babylon, nor Assyria, nor Rome, nor the Jewish leadership od Jesus' day ... were, in any way motivated by Science ... in their resistance /opposition to God.