LCMS evangelical?

Feb 27, 2019
5
3
51
South Pasadena
✟15,341.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No, Lutherans are evangelical in the historic sense, but not the American sense.We are not part of American Evangelicalism. Which we reject.[/QUOTE
I agree. I am an Evangelical Lutheran from the United States, but I reject what American Evangelicalism has become. It hurts to see our message sacrificed in the name of political power. I think most Evangelicals hold their beliefs rooted in fear, and not in self-sacrifice.
 
Upvote 0

Karen Hauser

New Member
Feb 28, 2019
1
0
64
Temecula
✟7,701.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Widowed
Jerry,
I am sorry you feel as though our message has been weakened through the increased support for loons like DT. I can't agree more, but it is always good to remain positive and uphold your faith for the sake of the people who need you. For the sake of the community you represent, your children, wife, and parents, Do not do not DO NOT lose faith. God created you for a reason, and I feel every child of his must remain faithful and outspoken in their respective communities.
 
Upvote 0

Newtheran

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2018
783
571
South
✟26,789.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah. Given current trends, I find it much more likely that the ELCA will merge with the North American UMC, the UCC, and the Episcopalians to form a single left leaning denomination. Whatever issues they have regarding polity can probably be worked out given their agreement on social issues.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TKA_TN

Active Member
May 23, 2018
178
160
36
Tennessee
✟66,366.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Yeah. Given current trends, I find it much more likely that the ELCA will merge with the North American UMC, the UCC, and the Episcopalians to form a single left leaning denomination. Whatever issues they have regarding polity can probably be worked out given their agreement on social issues.

Wish they would, honestly. I get some funny looks sometimes when I say I'm a Lutheran. I then have to explain that there's a Conservative branch that keeps with the Confessions, and a Liberal branch that doesn't and that I belong to the former.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Newtheran
Upvote 0

Newtheran

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2018
783
571
South
✟26,789.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Lutheran view on the sacraments is probably the one area most confusing to Baptists...

Working through the concept of sacraments vs ordinances was the biggest doctrinal difference I came up against when I started moving in this direction. The conclusion I came to was that the Orthodox probably have the most rational view of it with infant baptism with immediate chrismation and full participation in the life of the church.

Whether you adopt the baptist view of delaying baptism plus an age of accountability or infant baptism plus a confirmation that plus portion ends up adding some sort of philosophical construct to the equation to make it rational. But infant baptism plus confirmation is a much more reasonable approach than "age of accountability".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TKA_TN
Upvote 0

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
365
SW MO, USA
✟38,886.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Wish they would, honestly. I get some funny looks sometimes when I say I'm a Lutheran. I then have to explain that there's a Conservative branch that keeps with the Confessions, and a Liberal branch that doesn't and that I belong to the former.

I'm surprised at how many people are oblivious to that. Just saw a thread here today where someone said 'Lutherans' ordain women. Um, the ELCA might, but LCMS and WELS sure don't.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Newtheran
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,210
7,289
Tampa
✟768,102.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm surprised at how many people are oblivious to that. Just saw a thread here today where someone said 'Lutherans' ordain women. Um, the ELCA might, but LCMS and WELS sure don't.
Sure, buts it's understandable given that most Lutheran churches do. The conservative confessional synod's don't, but they are pretty outnumbered by the ELCA in the USA and the Lutheran churches in Europe that do ordain women.

That said, the conservative synods should try and get their message out better, which is the topic of another active thread here.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Newtheran

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2018
783
571
South
✟26,789.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,565
New Jersey
✟1,147,348.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
My aunt and uncle were Methodist missionaries in Bolivia. At that time (which was decades ago) they said that in Latin America evangelical was used to mean Protestant. As Methodists they were considered evangelical.

Wikipedia (Evangelicalism - Wikipedia) gives a variety of historical influences. But I would say that the modern use really dates to around 1950, when what was sometimes called neo-evangelicalism developed out of the fundamentalist movement, as a group that was more interested in engaging the culture. Conservative parts of various mainline traditions now call themselves evangelical. And there's some merit to that, because they share a lot of theology with the original neo-evangelicals.

The word "evangelical" in the ELCA's name is the older usage.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,381
5,253
✟817,023.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Well, among Evangelical churches, LCMS etc. would probably be on the extreme liturgical end of the spectrum, with Baptists on the extreme non-liturgical end, and conservative Presbyterians in the middle somewhere.
Such only scratches the surface. What makes the LCMS evangelical is Bible based theology without the application of various critical standards (mostly historical (that was then, this is now), the application of human Logic; and using personal experience to filter and interpret the Bible). Scripture interprets scripture, and scripture provides context to scripture. While we adhere to historic tradition, those practices and even our Lutheran Confessions remain subject to the authority of Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,381
5,253
✟817,023.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I was not meaning to start anything here, can they answer at least which church signed the statement saying Rome and Lutherans are now in agreement again?
Well, it is rhetoric; they are not. The body of Lutherans that signed that agreement with the RCC still hold it up, but their theology has regressed further to secular humanism where not even their rhetorical agreement applies any longer.

In reality, it was no more than a "photo opp".
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,381
5,253
✟817,023.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I don't think Pew Forum are wrong -- they are the experts. The word "Evangelical" today means "not theologically liberal," and covers all the non-liberal Protestant denominations.

If you're telling me that the LCMS is now the same as the ELCA, that is disappointing, and I will stay away from LCMS churches in future.

You could write and tell Pew Forum that the LCMS now identifies itself with the ELCA. You could even merge.
Let it mean to them what they want it to mean. That is no different than applying historic criticism to Scripture itself. Minimalism at it's best... create your own reality.
 
Upvote 0