Wow. See this post less than 24 hours ago in this very thread and in response to this same horrendous misrepresentation. Why are you so dishonest? Who do you think believes any of your refuted claims?Says the person that presents a fossil long down the line past that claimed split while being asked for a single common ancestor that split.... Not only off-topic, but then just now presents another off-topic rant.... All because his missing common ancestors are all imaginary and he can't provide one single one for one single creature for any evolutionary tree where any claimed split happened.
Your FAITH is strong....
Upvote
0