The origins of life are irrelevant to evolution, as you well know by now given the number of times it has been explained to you. And the difference between His, Their and Her kinds (why do you always ignore Her kinds?) is merely a linguistic construct of Jacobean English, as I also know you are well aware since I have spent many posts making this abundantly clear to you.
God did not write the Bible, men did. God did not translate it into English, other men did. The English translation you favour doesn't say what you claim it says.
Nope, doesn't eliminate "kinds" either... it is much more probable to me that God could have created all the different “kinds”, plant and animal, in stages since there is no convincing evidence of a complete progressive transformation as macroevolution would have it. Just a lot of microevolution happening, that's all.
Good luck refuting the ten of thousands of research papers in anatomy, zoology, botanty, microbiology, biochemistry, genetics, palaeontology, biogeography and the like that provide so much evidence it might well have had Thomas declaring "Wow! How could I ever have doubted."
Not convincing to you, anyway. But the fact remains that the theory of evolution does not deny the existence of God or His authorship of our being. To say it does is a lie, a betrayal of the Great Commission and a disgrace to the Christian faith.
How does my comment reject the Word of God? We know nothing of His methods and use of time-frames. You will never find enough written in the rocks and inscribed in our DNA to say "it definitely happened this way or He did it like this."
Maybe you're addressing the many non-believing proponents of macroevolution. As for me, disregarding God's Word everytime an evolutionist tells me 'this or that' couldn't have happened, or this is how He did it according to our reasoning, is not a betrayal of the Great Commission and a disgrace to the Christian faith.
