River Jordan
Well-Known Member
- Dec 26, 2024
- 801
- 348
- 37
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
By itself with no other context (as Tour presented it), no.Are you now asserting that shared DNA's is no longer sufficient evidence for a common ancestor?
He is either ignorant of, or deliberately omitting the key context that I've posted about, both of which erode his credibility on the subject. Since he's a chemist and not a biologist, evolutionary biologist, or geneticist that's not exactly a surprise.If so, is your claim that because Dr. Tour is only partially correct in his claim, that he is, therefore, incredible?
The "specific genetic sequences in common" have been one of my main points since the start. To repeat for the third time, it's not that they're merely similar, it's that they're similar in very specific ways (for example share genetic errors).Therefore, you abandon the common ancestor claim that humans evolved from any other kind of living creature that lacks specific genetic sequences in common?
That's a complete non sequitur.Or at least admit the evidence for that claim is on the lowest confidence level possible for scientific claims, ie., consensus among biased "experts"?
Upvote
0