ByTheSpirit
Come Lord Jesus
- May 17, 2011
- 11,429
- 4,658
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
No, the main telling point of the apostles were that they had been called to preach the Gospel among the nations and build up Christ's Church. The working of miracles were entirely peripheral and served only that primary purpose.
Where do you get this notion that the miraculous is somehow a primary characteristic of apostleship? The Church has always recognized the miraculous, it doesn't take an apostle, God can work however God desires to work. If God wanted to use a donkey to raise the dead, He is more than capable of doing so.
-CryptoLutheran
Yes Apostles were called to preach the gospel but to try and state that miracles were not one of the signs of an apostle is to outright deny scripture itself.
2 Corinthians 12:12
I persevered in demonstrating among you the marks of a true apostle, including signs, wonders and miracles.
You cannot refute that and your entire basis of discussion is rendered mute by the Holy Spirit.
Upvote
0