I do like your chosen username and the line you've chosen below it.l
Hello Daryl, and God bless. I do love the truth and Christ is the truth , The anointing teaches all things and is truth. I seek, as we all should, to walk in the anointing and to be taught all things by the anointing, which is the word of God 1 John 2:27.
It is my sincere hope that, if you do love Truth, you will have realized and internalized the truth that we should not think we know anything (1 Corinthians 8:2), and thus your spirit remains teachable.l
Yes I am teachable, but I listen for the anointing that teaches all things, I have no need that any man teach me, I listen for the new man in Christ as the head and as he works effectually in the measure of every part. I listen carefully for the inner witness of Christ in me. But as i listen to your words I also listen for that witness and while I see some good qualities in your behaviour and words, I see great error in understanding and you speak what you know from men and natural learning and not from the truth in many parts as I hope to show.
Please bear with me, I mean no insult or harm, but you are in great error. The Judas argument of men being saved and falling away and losing salvation is only one of a massive amount of truths from scripture i can show. Really it would take 800 pages to go trough the massive witness of these things from scripture. and inner witness of Christ in me. And while we we know nothing of ourselves, and if any man think he does he knows nothing as he ought to. But we have an unction from the holy one we know all things. The anointing teaches us all things and we need to grow in this and the revelation of God.
Would you say that your spirit is teachable? To be fair, if you were to ask me the same question, I would say that I certainly hope so.
Yes I am teachable by the anointing that teaches all things, I have no need that any man should teach me nor does any saint ( 1 John 2:27) and if you speak from the leading of the Spirit in the anointing it will bear witness with my spirit and with the holy scriptures. I find that many do not listen for this leading but are often drawn away after man and natural learning and tossed about by every wind of doctrine and denominational man made forms and doctrines. but until i show this it is all my words , so bear with me as i seek to show this by the grace of God.
With due respect, I do feel that your understanding is not correct and that the verses you quote, along with others I will provide, do not in fact support your position.
here you show that you are not in the anointing and you use the words "respect", consider your correction here and before you scoff at it pause,
"My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons....9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors." (James 2;1,9 KJV) and yes I know the context is referring to the rich and poor in the gatherings and mens respect of persons. But the respect of persons takes on many forms and is forbidden in scripture. Honour and esteem are better words to use towards each other. Respect means favouritism and to be partial.
Sorry, no. At the time Jesus spoke the words in John 17:6, Judas had already left to betray him (back in John 13:26-27).
You are in error here, lets look at the section,
"I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word." ( John 17:6)
Here we see that the men that were given to Jesus were also called unto him in matthew 10 "And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples..." This is when they were given to him. They were called out out of the world. So jesus is referring to the disciples all of them, Judas included as he said further in John 17,
"While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled." (John 17:12)
Notice here that Jesus refers to those that were given to him, which in the context include Judas. Jesus says none of them is lost (among those that were given to him) except Judas. Jesus also says while ehe was ( past tense with them) he is not referring to the present reality in that verse. This shows that of all the 12 that were given to Jesus in the past and only Judas fell by transgression and was lost in the end.
This shows that the 12 apostles that Jesus called to him, were given to him by the Father and he said "thine they were" (past tense) this shows that the Father gave them to Jesus at the beginning of his ministry. This shows that even before they were given to jesus they belonged to the father. And of all those that were given to Jesus among the 12 only one was lost having once belonged to the father. This is so clear to the unbiased reader.
Also, please complete the verse: "...and they have kept Your word."
Still referring to the past event when all the apostles believed his word and were kept, Judas also believed for a time. But among those given Judas fell away. This happened in time. When Judas was going out and casting out devils and believing the word of the Lord and when they all came back and jesus told them not to rejoice that the devils are subject to them but that their names are written in the lambs book of life. Judas at that time would have kept his word and been as successful as the others. jesus even said to the twelve that they would sit on 12 thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel. here were promises to all 12 Judas included at one time, until he betrayed jesus and fell by transgression. Judas at one time had part of the ministry and apostleship, he was a sent one of God and so to be such he would have had to believe the word of Jesus and kept the word.
Judas did not keep the Father's word.
Yes he did when he was called of jesus as one of HIS disciples. Notice Judas was not one of the devils disciples in mMatthew 10. He belonged to jesus and of his household as the text clearly says. At this time he would have had to keep his word in order to be sent and given power to cast out devils. Satan cannot cast out satan, and jesus would not send a devil to cast out devils, this would go against his won teaching.
We could also see John 17 referring to the apostles that were saved then as well and they have kept the word. But the context extends even further back to when jesus was with them in the world since the father first gave them to him.
Yes, Judas was one of Jesus's twelve disciples, but he was not one of the chosen.
This is your made up interpretation and surmising, not according to scripture ,
"
Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve..." (John 6:70) and the 12 that were originally called and chosen were
HIS disciples. "And when he had called unto him
his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits,"( Matthew 10:1)
also we read
"And he ordained twelve, that they should be with him, and that he might send them forth to preach," (Mark 3:14)
ordained here means- to appoint then or choose them to do a work.
again scripture is clear and your interpretation is strained and not true. Judas was called and chosen to go forth and preach and given power and belonged to the father before given to jesus and one of jesus disciples. But as he went away from God this call and chosen aspect changed.
Jesus had already known from the beginning who was going to betray him -- and called Judas anyway to fulfill Scripture. John 6:64, John 17:12, and John 13:18.
You misunderstand prophecy. God knowing all things doesn't mean he made men sin or go against him etc. God can see a being saved and walking with him and then see how they fall away and depart from him and still during the times when they are saved God can extend every grace and love to them, even knowing they will turn away.
We see this clearly with Lucifer. He was perfect in all his way and walked with God a covering Cherub, blessed and holy. Then he went away and fell and will end up in the lake of fire. God knew from the beginning that Lucifer would fall. But that doesn't stop God from loving him while he was with him and walking close to Lucifer before he fell. Lucifer was perfect in all his ways, yet in time God knew he would fall. Judas is similar to this and so is every saint who walks with God then departs and ends up in the lake of fire.
This is true but not relevant. The sons of the Pharisees, some itinerant Jewish exorcists, and the seven sons of Sceva were also casting out evil spirits, and they were not saved. Matthew 12:27 and Acts 19:13-16.
This is false. The sons of Pharisees and false prophets and false men are not given power by Jesus to cast out devils. All the ones given such power by Jesus were also successful including Judas. He partook of the ministry and by the power of God. he was not a fake minister as some are. And yes even true ministers can cast out devils etc and end up in hell. They may try to say to God did not we cast out devils ( as Judas could) but if they die in their sin and unbelief and in the flesh then God never knew them. God only knows believers IN CHRIST , when they put of Christ. If they don't have Christ and are not covered with his righteousness God does not know them. God only knows those in Christ. Think of it this way, imagine a man puts a white sheet over his body and that sheet is Christ and his righteousness, and God knows him in that. But now he puts off that sheet and is in his flesh, God does not know him in that, and God never knew him in the flesh.
True but not relevant. What is relevant here is that Judas never believed in Jesus (and thus was never saved -- John 6:64 again).
You just say Judas never believed in jesus, but he did for sure. Or jesus wouldn't have said he was HIS disciple and sent him out to the lost sheep as a found sheep, and given him power to cast out devils etc.
The name of Jesus has power, and, as in point #3, even those who are not saved may use it. Doing miracles does not in any way indicate that one is saved. Matthew 7:22.
What, are you saying that even the lost can use the name of jesus and have power? The false men tried that in Acts and the devils jumped all over them. they were not in the NAME of jesus Christ and his life and so they were not known.
And you do know that there were/are false apostles, no? 2 Corinthians 11:13.
Judas wasn't a false apostle at the first. Jesus called him and sent him. Unless you are trying to say Jesus was mistaken. Also we read in Acts that Judas was a true apostle and he fell
"That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place." ( Acts 1:25)
The scriptures correct you here. Also we read
"Now the names of the twelve apostles are...and Judas Iscariot,..."( Matthew 10:2-4)
I believe the scriptural witness not your surmising about Judas being called as a false apostle and devil from the beginning. scripture is clear here
"And when he had called unto him
his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits,..."
Clearly all 12 were HIS and not the devils. But some twist and wrest the scriptures in tis place sadly.
No, he did not. in Matthew 10:16, Jesus told his apostles that they were being sent out as sheep in the midst of wolves, not that they were his sheep. This is a totally different context, with a totally different meaning.
No it is not, and i see you are trying to avoid such a clear correction and evidence. lets look at it,
' But go rather to the
lost sheep of the house of Israel." ( Matthew 10:6)
Here jesus shows that there are LOST sheep he is sending them to. He would not send a lost sheep to help the lost sheep, a blind man cannot lead another blind man as jesus said. Then he said
"16 Behold, I send you forth as
sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves." (Matthew 10:16)
we know that no man is a literal sheep. But clearly to send his apostles ( all 12) as sheep to the lost sheep shows that they are found sheep and jesus said his sheep ear his voice and they follow him. The 12 followed jesus and were his sheep. This is so clear you are simply trying to avoid the consequence of this verse to avoid the reality of judas being a found sheep sent to the lost sheep.
We know that the apostles were saved and had eyes to see the kingdom as Jesus said to them. And except a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom, but Jesus said that their eyes see.
Not necessarily. Jesus said to "...let your peace come upon it...", not the peace of God. You're making an assumption that Judas had the peace of God, but that is not what the verse says.
The peace they had was the peace of God, the houses they found "worthy" their peace would come upon it. No man can have peace with God except through their relationship with God and if they are in that peace. You twist this to try and fit your view. By receiving the apostles they were in fact receiving jesus and his word and the message and power he ave the apostles
Sorry, no. Jesus was at this point speaking of the future of the apostles; none of what he described is documented as happening on this occasion of their being sent out.
That is your assumption, he said it to them as scripture shows, and it applied to them and to all who are sent forth of all times.
Yes, the holy spirit would indeed be speaking through the apostles when these foretold events happened, but Judas was long dead by then.
False Jesus was speaking to them directly and it applied to them. This is just your wrong theology that tries to fit it into your understanding. All OT saints were saved and had the new birth. Jesus said to the 12
"Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves:...For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you." (Matthew 10:16,20) . If you admit that jesus is speaking to the twelve as he was this messes up your theology. But let it be messed up, follow truth not man made theology. These truths apply to all who are sent of all times.
Judas never believed in Jesus, so he was never a member of his household. John 6:64 once again. Jesus was speaking of those who were in fact of his household.
this is just your made up stuff and trying again hard to avoid the context and who he is speaking to. As I showed he spoke these things to the 12 apostles and these truths extend to all who are sent of all time. Judas and the 11 were of his household because they were the found sheep sent to the lost sheep and his disciples.
Sorry, no. This is human reasoning. I've already shown that Jesus foreknew who would betray him, so Judas's betrayal came as no surprise to him.
I already showed you that to betray someone you have to first have their trust. Judas was in the ministry and called and sent by Jesus as an apostle. To foreknow something doesn't mean God made it happen or made any sin. We already looked at Lucifer who was perfect in all his ways and walked with God in relationship then fell and will end up in the lake of fire.
Now, did Jesus treat Judas as a trusted friend? Absolutely.
Does Jesus trust a man if he was always a devil as you say, and call him a familiar friend? No. Judas was loved and an apostle sent one who was ordained by Jesus. Jesus doesn't make mistakes.
Sorry, no. Acts 1:20 refers specifically to Psalms 69:25 and Psalms 109:8, and to those verses only. Psalms 69:28 is specifically not mentioned.
wrong no writer quotes verses out of context, the verses about being blotted out are in the next few verses in context. You error here greatly.
"25 Let
their habitation be desolate; and let none dwell in their tents.
26 For
they persecute him whom thou hast smitten; and they talk to the grief of those whom thou hast wounded.
27 Add iniquity unto
their iniquity: and let them not come into thy righteousness.
28 Let
them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous."
the same ones spoken of in context. You need to reconsider your words here.
Judas was doomed to destruction to fulfill Scripture (John 17:12). It was by his act of transgression, foreknown by Jesus, that he fell. And there is nothing in Acts 1:25 that indicates he had any choice in the transgression; it simply states the act.
All men have a choice to choose life or death and to believe or not. No man is a robot as some false teachers imply with their erroneous doctrines. Judas was shown in prophecy to fall. But Lucifer also was seen to fall by God. This does not delete the fact that Judas was once a saved man and that Lucifer was perfect in all his ways and a covering cherub blessed at one time. You again misunderstand prophecy .
and Judas by transgression fell. Fell from what? how can he fall if he was always fallen as some wrongly teach? He fell from God and the ministry and calling of God and went to his own place, damned lost as jesus said. Better to never have been born that to betray the Son of God. Espescially after he had soo many blessings and was called and chosen and given power and had the Spirit of the father speaking in him at one time. We could also say that Lucifer had such things in a different way as a perfect being created by God.
In conclusion, to speak frankly, every single point originally made has been shown to be either incorrect or irrelevant. You appear to be trying to make the verses you quoted fit what you desire to be true, but they cannot be made to do so.
In conclusion I have rebuked and corrected you on almost every point, I could correct every point you made but some overall and are similar. You desire to be true but are found in falsehood and following the teachings and bias of man made doctrines.
It is my hope that you will ask for the wisdom of God (James 1:5) and will deeply and prayerfully consider what I have submitted here before God with an open mind and heart.
It is my hope that you will repent of your erroneous teachings and ask for wisdom from God and prayerfully consider what I wrote with an open heart and mind