Yu have a most incorrect understanding of predestination, as I have pointed out to you several times before and with direct quotes from Calvin. Yes, in Calvin, we are but puppets. In a similar vein, Luther said the princes are but puppets.
There is no "correct" understanding of predestination.
Predestination means and always has meant simply that the destiny of every thing was decided before that thing or person came into actual existence.
You may well be right if you said that Marvin Knox has explained predestination better than John Calvin did.
But, that being said, John Calvin did not teach a doctrine of external coercion or compulsion on the part of God concerning the choices His creatures make.
Concerning that - Calvin simply agreed with Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, and the entire tradition of Christian orthodoxy.
John Calvin did agree with the T.U.L.I.P. segment which proclaims that God’s grace is irresistible and flows from his electing love. But Calvin (like me) believed that God's grace renews us from
within. It does not coerce from
without.
The view that God has predestined all that happens does not mean that God is a puppet master pulling on our strings so that we do what He wants apart from our own willing or doing. His will precedes our will, but it does not eradicate it.
The predestination of all that occurs in God's creation being completely compatible with the will of the creature is something that Calvin (like the Westminster Confession that followed him) would completely agree with.
Calvinism affirms with Arminianism that God does not coerce the love of his human creatures nor is He the author of their sins.
God does not work on his people by means of forcible coercion either to sin or to holiness. God does however renew the hearts of the elect so that we can feel and choose and do what we ought.
God does not renew the hearts of all men in such a way but the elect only.
His passing by of some men and pouring out His renewing grace on others does not in any way eliminate the guilt of the reprobate whom he passes by.
This is was John Calvin's conclusion in the matter as it is mine.