The Righterzpen
Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
- Feb 9, 2019
- 3,452
- 1,376
- 54
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Interesting.Universal is also merely an encompassing like term.
One can believe mankind is "universally" atoned for and still believe for example that devils are also "universally" condemned and not atoned for, which answers to your positions. You just left out that other party to the equations.
For the record many universalists do not believe there is Satanic salvation, but some, like the thread opening author do promote that.
I don't think it's feasible or necessary.
I see nowhere in Scripture where any atonement is ever provided for the angelic host.
Closest that I’ve ever seen is the phrase “elect angels” in 1 Timothy 5:21; but that says nothing about atonement related to angels.
Then we have Hebrews 2:16 which explains why there is no atonement for angels; because “For verily he (Christ) took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.” And this is why humanity is provided redemption but angels are not.
Also, personally I’m not a proponent of universal human atonement either.
Scripture speaks of the elect being the ones Christ died for. Those being predestined to election from the foundation of the world. None of us know who they are; other than we can know if we ourselves are elect. The only other thing that is stated about the elect is that they are represented of every kindred, tribe, tongue and nation.
As far as universal atonement goes though; the major question it raises is if no one is condemned then what anyone believes is irrelevant, thus the preaching of the gospel becomes a moot point. Also with universal atonement, no one is required to repent either. (Which isn’t supported by Scripture either.) “…. Repent and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15)
Upvote
0