Guess things would be different. But that's not the case, so what's your point.What would have happened if the Israelites had of continued to obey Crib? Do you think God would have broken His promise?
bugkiller
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Guess things would be different. But that's not the case, so what's your point.What would have happened if the Israelites had of continued to obey Crib? Do you think God would have broken His promise?
NawI don't claim to be able to do anything, so your contentions that I am able to keep the Law are flawed... but, in Christ I can do all things!
Then its clearly evident you don't believe.Matthew 19:26
But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Mark 9:23
Jesus said unto him, If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth.
Mark 10:27
And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
When did I ever say I was justified by the Law? I am justified through Christ's atoning blood... because of this, I am obedient to His Commands. And through His Grace, I am able.
You haven't changed, have you Crib... still mischaracterizing people on here that don't see as you do... does this make Jesus smile? Me thinks not...
Where's your verse?Oh, Crib, you asked me to concede if I couldn't find the verse you said didn't exist... will you now concede you were wrong?
Do you mean this verse to indicate we're obligated to the law?Jesus fulfilled the requirements for atonement from sin... He came to establish the Law.
Romans 3:31
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Your god isn't powerful enough to fulfill the Law's requirements on our behalf.So God cannot accomplish this in us if we surrender to Him? My God is that powerful... it's His Law after all.
Nice chatting with you Crib... sorry you couldn't engage in a more meaningful discussion.#1. You're changing the subject and have fail to prove your argument. I disengage from your Question games.
Good luck with keeping the law and the Q game.
Sadly, that's what you don't understand...He not only fulfilled the Law but He is able to empower His people to obey it.Your god isn't powerful enough to fulfill the Law's requirements on our behalf.
Your games don't fly with me ECR. The scriptures that you post exposes that you run from context.Nice chatting with you Crib... sorry you couldn't engage in a more meaningful discussion.
Not overly concerned with what flies with you... c ya.Your games don't fly with me ECR. The scriptures that you post exposes that you run from context.
This shows no one obeys the law, and your a liar if you say you do.Why do you continue to mischaracterize those of us that love God enough to surrender in obedience to Him.. show me one quote from myself (or any other Sabbath keeper on here, if that helps) that claims they are justified by the Law... you, Crib and others play this game of mud slinging hoping that you can trip us up or make us look foolish to others... God sees the mud on your hands.
Why be under the law when you don't have to and can't obey it.Exodus chapter 20 verse 10
but the seventh day is a Sabbath to tho Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates.
Exodus chapter 35 verse 3 Do not light a fire in any of your dwellings on the Sabbath day.
So if you want to follow the Sabbath you can't have your stove on or refrigerator, because that would cause people to work, or do you just want to keep a little of the Sabbath, which brings me to my original post.
Have you come up with that quote yet that I believe justification is through keeping the Law? You don't really care what I believe and are just pushing your anti obedience to God shtick...This shows no one obeys the law, and your a liar if you say you do.
You're not that lucky... I'll be here to comment on your posts till you're exposed. What I said is I will not chase after your question game, that keeps you from answering our response.Not overly concerned with what flies with you... c ya.
I understand... when you are able to answer my questions though feel free.You're not that lucky... I'll be here to comment on your posts till you're exposed. What I said is I will not chase after your question game, that keeps you from answering our response.
No, if he had fulfilled it then we would NOT be accountable to it. If one is having to obey laws then NOTHING has changed regarding them. Changing punishment doesn't do anything as long as there is punishment then the Law is still unfulfilled.Sadly, that's what you don't understand...He not only fulfilled the Law but He is able to empower His people to obey it.
I call it not hopping on the merry-go-round where unsubstantiated claims are made and stacked higher and higher till they reach the sky and the mountain of them are hid behind by those making them.You're not that lucky... I'll be here to comment on your posts till you're exposed. What I said is I will not chase after your question game, that keeps you from answering our response.
So what are the unrighteous judged by?No, if he had fulfilled it then we would NOT be accountable to it. If one is having to obey laws then NOTHING has changed regarding them. Changing punishment doesn't do anything as long as there is punishment then the Law is still unfulfilled.
If you really didn't ignore Paul you would know the answer to this, as some of the unrighteous ARE judged by the Law but some are not judged by it according to if they were bound by the Law (part of Israel) to keep it. Paul say that the righteous have no need of the Law, which makes those who "need" the Law in that category of the unrighteous IMO as they thumb their nose at Jesus offer of righteousness by faith in him.So what are the unrighteous judged by?
Hebrews chapter 7 verses 11,12 If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood for on the basis of it the law was given to the people why was there still need for another priest to come one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law.I understand... when you are able to answer my questions though feel free.
Maybe this will help if you read it and apply it.So what are the unrighteous judged by?