• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Lord's day.

The Lord' s day is Sunday.

  • There is biblical evidence that Sunday is the Lord's day.

  • There is no biblical evidence that Sunday is the Lord's day.

  • I don't care if Sunday is the Lord's day or not.


Results are only viewable after voting.

WailingWall

Regular Member
Dec 5, 2007
1,771
133
earth
✟41,195.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You can always tell when they are meaning "The Sabbath:" because they are ALWAYS denouncing Sabbath Keeping as a Satanic, anti-Christian, anti-Grace, anti-Resurrection heresy.

If what you say is true...im not surprised

Luke 6:22 (KJV)
22 Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.
 
Upvote 0

Elder 111

Member
Mar 12, 2010
5,104
110
where there is summer all year and sea all around
✟30,223.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally Posted by Elder 111
Where on the bible would I find support for or evidence of this?
The idea that every single question can be answered strictly from the scripture about historical Christianity is delusional.

You REALLY expect me to disregard First Century Christianity and give credibility to your ideas on reading the Bible?

Your conclusions from the Bible were tossed onto the ash heap of history 2,000 years ago. The First Century Christians were simultaneously battling two virulent heresies that read the Bible just like you do, that came to the same conclusions that you have. Claiming it was all from the Bible.

How is it that you think your heresy is so unique? Are you really so grandiose to believe that your heresy has never been seen before? Your heresy was forcibly rejected by Christianity 2,000 years ago. Just because you think you have discovered in the bible does not mean that someone else 2,000 years ago didn't come to the same conclusion.
In other words there is no biblical support for you position.
God said to prove all things by His word. Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
According to scripture your view have no light.
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The idea that every single question can be answered strictly from the scripture about historical Christianity is delusional.

You REALLY expect me to disregard First Century Christianity and give credibility to your ideas on reading the Bible?

Your conclusions from the Bible were tossed onto the ash heap of history 2,000 years ago. The First Century Christians were simultaneously battling two virulent heresies that read the Bible just like you do, that came to the same conclusions that you have. Claiming it was all from the Bible.

How is it that you think your heresy is so unique? Are you really so grandiose to believe that your heresy has never been seen before? Your heresy was forcibly rejected by Christianity 2,000 years ago. Just because you think you have discovered in the bible does not mean that someone else 2,000 years ago didn't come to the same conclusion.

And you are tossing Scriptures in the process. That big fat foot will get caught in a meat grinder someday.
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally Posted by Elder 111
Where on the bible would I find support for or evidence of this?

In other words there is no biblical support for you position.
God said to prove all things by His word. Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
According to scripture your view have no light.

You might as well put that in the "right division" category to mmake it more effective. Be aware of whom the Scriptures are regarding at the time...whether they be for the Gentiles or for Israel.
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Thanky you. I might just take my "heresies" right on over there. But then again. I might be banned. Mob rules. ;)

While you are considering being a hero, why don't you contemplate the history of the EO, which you have implied has no courage of beliefs, a quick willingness to submit to apostasy, and cowardly holds non-Biblical beliefs out of sheer convenience:

In Memory Of The 50 Million Victims Of The Orthodox Christian Holocaust

"Editors Notes: We cannot even well imagine but "50 Million Victims Of The Orthodox Christian Holocaust" is not the correct number, as we have learned from Alexander Solzhenitsyn that more then 66.5 million Orthodox Christians also perished from 1917 and onward during the times of the Soviet Union."

It is very easy to announce your beliefs. But your Church has NO history of dying for them. That must be why it is so easy for you to so casually smear and slander the courage of both First Century and modern Christians who refused to compromise, and then paid the ultimate penalty for their belief in Jesus Christ and the Resurrection.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
While you are considering being a hero, why don't you contemplate the history of the EO, which you have implied has no courage of beliefs, a quick willingness to submit to apostasy, and cowardly holds non-Biblical beliefs out of sheer convenience:

In Memory Of The 50 Million Victims Of The Orthodox Christian Holocaust

"Editors Notes: We cannot even well imagine but "50 Million Victims Of The Orthodox Christian Holocaust" is not the correct number, as we have learned from Alexander Solzhenitsyn that more then 66.5 million Orthodox Christians also perished from 1917 and onward during the times of the Soviet Union."

It is very easy to announce your beliefs. But your Church has NO history of dying for them. That must be why it is so easy for you to so casually smear and slander the courage of both First Century and modern Christians who refused to compromise, and then paid the ultimate penalty for their belief in Jesus Christ and the Resurrection.

I smeared no one. You smear yourself telling me I must adhere to their teachings rather than Scriptures being my guide. You made YOURSELF a liar. THAT is a cowardly and unChristian stance beyond Scriptural revelation. You make your OWN rules. God made mine. You are assisting the accuser of the brethren with YOUR slander. I NEVER doubted their bravery one bit.

Polycarp 1:3...though ye saw Him not, ye believe with joy unutterable and full of
glory; unto which joy many desire to enter in; forasmuch as ye know that it is[bless and do not curse]by grace ye are saved, not of works, but by the will of God through Jesus Christ.


Leads to contradiction here:
Polycarp 2:2...Now[bless and do not curse]He that raised Him[bless and do not curse]from the dead[bless and do not curse]will raise us also; if we do His will and walk in His commandments and love the things which He loved, abstaining from all unrighteousness, covetousness, love of money, evil speaking, false witness;[bless and do not curse]not rendering evil for evil or railing for railing[bless and do not curse]or blow for blow or cursing for cursing;

 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
In other words there is no biblical support for you position.
God said to prove all things by His word. Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
According to scripture your view have no light.

Yes, the cowardly Early Christians with "no biblical support" for their Sunday Keeping, had immediately Apostatized, giving in quickly to the evil forces demanding an end to their beloved Sabbath Keeping:

"Removal of the skin is so excruciating that victims invariably passed out multiple times during the torture. To prevent this, they were usually hung upside down so the excess blood flow to their brains forced them to remain conscious. The skin is not easy to remove, and torturers rarely made an effort to remove it in one piece unless they wanted a trophy. Typically, the skin was sliced into strips, then each strip peeled from the body with the aid of a knife. Often, the skin was thrown into a fire or to animals, or dangled before the victim’s eyes. This is how Bartholomew, one of the 12 apostles, was killed by locals in Armenia, into whose language he translated Matthew’s Gospel. The Armenians refused to abandon their idols and executed Bartholomew by crucifying him upside down and skinning him."
.....
"Julian of Antioch was tortured every day for an entire year and displayed to the crowds in every town in Cilicia, (a southern coastal region of what is now Turkey). He was then sewn into a skin filled with asps and scorpions and flung into the Aegean Sea. He was said to have floated all the way across the Mediterranean to Alexandria, Egypt."
......
"In 222, a woman named Cecilia, possibly Saint Cecilia, was boiled in a bathtub over a bed of coals for a day and a half, after she converted her husband and brother. They were beheaded, as was the captain who led them to their deaths, because he converted in view of the victims’ fearlessness."
.....
"Under the rule of Maximian, Saint Victor Maurus may have suffered the most excruciating death of all. He secretly ministered to his parishioners in Milan until about 303, when he was discovered and immediately dragged through the streets behind a horse while the crowds stripped him naked and beat him, then demanded he recant. He refused and was stretched on the rack for a day, during which time he prayed to God for patience. He was then imprisoned—and immediately converted three of his guards. When Maximian heard of this, he ordered the guards beheaded, and Victor racked again, while the torturers beat him savagely with clubs. He was ordered to recant and refused a third time. Maximian had a Roman altar built and ordered Victor to sacrifice incense on it to Jupiter. This enraged Victor, who kicked over the altar. Maximian furiously ordered the offending foot cut off, after which Victor was flung into a stone mill used to grind wheat into flour, and the torturers ground him to death."
.....
"The breaking wheel is a horribly painful method of torture in which the victim was tied to the side of a wheel laid flat on the ground. Then one of two methods was employed: Either the torturer used a sledgehammer to smash every limb to pulp, or the wheel was made to turn in transection with another, like gears, so that the victim’s body was crushed between them. No bone or section of bone was spared, except the torso and head to keep the victim alive. Sometimes the genitals were smashed. Then the victim was left in this condition to die from exposure, blood loss, or to be eaten by birds and ants.This was the fate of a man called Peter, in Lampsacus, Mysia (now Lapseki in Turkey), in about 250. He was martyred along with three others: Paul, Andrew, and Dionisia. Dionisia was condemned to be raped to death."
.....
"The infuriated prefect ordered metal plates to be set over a bed of coals and heated until they were red-hot. Saint Lawrence was then bound and laid naked on them, face up. His flesh sizzled, smoked, and was burned black, yet Lawrence made no outcry, nor did he beg forgiveness from the prefect. He finally called in a clear voice, “I’m done on that side. Turn me over and eat.”

10 Horrifying Tortures Of Early Christians - Listverse

Yes those wimpy Early Christians were a bunch of cowards, that slunked into a corner with their tail between their legs, refusing to obey clear Bible texts demanding Sabbath Keeping, and giving up the Sabbath at the first sign of inconvenience, and quickly abandoning the truths of the bible! If only they had been brave enough not to have immediately apostatized for no reason, the entire Christian world could have remained brave Sabbath Keepers today!

Those Early Christians could have bolstered their courage by reading all of those Spam pro-Sabbath texts. If only! And for sure, the Eastern Orthodox should have never venerated people like these as Saints!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
]I smeared no one.

Every conspiracy theory of Sabbath abandonment implicitly assumes that the Early Christians cravenly caved on the issue. Ellen White advanced a Conspiracy theory of history wherein the Pope unilaterally instituted Sunday worship, after the Early Christians had supposedly kept the Sabbath for more than 300 years. White smeared Catholics who worshiped on Sunday as "The harlot of Babylon" or Protestants as: "Apostate Daughters of the harlot of Babylon." Her book "The Great Controversy" is so incredibly dishonest to history in its eagerness to smear and slam Catholicism that it has been investigated as a hate crime in Canada.

Adventist Sabbath Scholar Samuele Bacchiochi charged that Christian cowardice in the face of Roman persecution had caused universal Sabbath abandonment no later than 135 AD. Which is just slightly more honest than White's bizarre and paranoid conspiracy theory, which would have taken place more than two hundred years later.

Give the unbelievable and undeniable heroism of Early Christians in the face of grizzly torture and brutal death, both theories are patently ridiculous and an ugly smear on the memory of those brave martyrs. The fairy tale that Early Christians abandoned Bible teachings is just an ugly slander, dishonest to history, and contrary to the clear instructions of Paul in the Epistles and the Decree emanating from the Council of Jerusalem in AD 50.

Christianity abandoned Sabbath Keeping immediately after the Resurrection, in response to the most amazing set of circumstances ever witnessed in world history. There was NO disregard for the scriptures. The Scriptures completely support the actions of these brave and utterly selfless people, who knew that staying loyal to Jesus Christ could and would result in gruesome torture and violent execution. Had their been any reason whatsoever in the scriptures or the teachings of the Apostles to keep the Sabbath, these brave martyrs would have eagerly gone to torture and death rather than renounce it.

Here's how Polycarp went out in style:

"This made his judges very angry. They had confidently supposed that they would be able to easily persuade him to do what they wanted him to do. They became vicious in their words and actions. They literally threw him out of the chariot he had been sitting in, which cause serious injury to his thigh. This display of force incited the blood thirsty mob to the point that they were so loud in their curses and jeers that no one could hear. As they were dragging Polycarp to the place of execution, a voice rang out from Heaven loud and clear, above the harangue of the crowd which said, "Be strong, Polycarp, and quit thyself like a man." [The phrase "quit you" means, to carry through, or perform to the end. Hence, be strong and stand like a man to the end.] The record states that while no one saw who it was that spoke to Polycarp, many of the believers who were in the crowd clearly heard the voice also.

To be sure, Polycarp stood for the Lord Jesus Christ to the end, despite all the efforts to persuade him to renounce Christ. One of the judges tried to get him to deny his faith by saying, "Reverence thy old age…Swear by Casear's Fortune. Repent, and say; Take away the Wicked." The historian goes on to say, "Polycarp, looking with a stern countenance upon the whole multitude of wicked Gentiles, that was gathered together in the Lifts, and shaking his hand at them, looked up to Heaven, and groaning said, Take away the Wicked." But the judge was not satisfied with this. He said, "Sware, and I will set thee at liberty; reproach Christ."

It is at this point that Polycarp gives his famous response --

"Eighty and six years have I now served Christ, and he has never done me the least wrong: How then can I blaspheme my King and my Savior?"

The judge then angrily urges him to, "swear by the Genius of Caesar." Polycarp refuses, but offered to share his faith in Christ. The judge rejected the offer and threatened, "I have wild beasts ready, to those I will cast thee except thou repent." Polycarp responds calmly, "Call for them then: For we Christians are fixed in our minds not to change from good to evil; But for me it will be good to be changed from Evil, to Good." The furious judge said, "Seeing that thou dispiseth the Wild Beasts, I will cause thee to be devoured by Fire, unless thou shall repent." Polycarp answered, "Thou threatenest me with Fire which burns for an hour, and so is extinguished; but knowest not the Fire of the Future Judgment, and of that Eternal Punishment, which is reserved for the Ungodly. But why tarriest thou? Bring forth what thou wilt!"

The judge loudly cried out three times, "Polycarp has confessed himself to be a Christian." The mob responded in fury, "This is the Doctor of Asia; The Father of the Christians; an the overthrower of our Gods. He that has taught so many not to sacrifice, nor pay any worship to the Gods." At first they cried out that the lions should be loosed on him and then that he should be burned alive.

They took Polycarp to the stake and were going to nail him there. He spoke up and said, "Let me alone as I am: For he who has given me strength to endure the Fire, will also enable me, without your securing me by nails, to stand without moving in the pile." The merely tied him to the stake.

He prayed this prayer before the fire was was kindled --

Lord God Almighty, the Father of thy Well-beloved, and Blessed Son, Jesus Christ, by whom we have received Knowledge of thee; the God of Angels and Powers, and of every Creature, and especially the whole Race of Just Men who live in thy presence! I give thee hearty thanks that thou hast vouchsafed (allowed) to bring me to this Day, and to this Hour; that I should have a part in the Number of thy Martyrs, in the Cup of thy Christ, to the Resurrection of Eternal Life, both of Soul and Body, in the Incorruption of the Holy Ghost. Among which may I be accepted this Day before thee, as a fat and acceptable Sacrifice; as thou the true God, with who is no falsehood, has both before ordained, and manifested unto me, and also hath now fulfilled it. For this, and for all things else, I praise thee, I bless thee, I glorify thee by the Eternal, and Heavenly High Priest, Jesus Christ they Beloved Son; whit whom to Thee and the Holy Ghost, be Glory both now, and to all succeeding Ages, AMEN.

Upon the "AMEN" the executioner lighted the fire"
http://www.logosresourcepages.org/History/polycarp.htm
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
And you are tossing Scriptures in the process. That big fat foot will get caught in a meat grinder someday.
I don't think he is. I rather like his prospective from history. I see that it complies with the Bible. This sort of argument you provide has never been said about the SDA historical points of interest. Wonder why?
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I don't think he is. I rather like his prospective from history. I see that it complies with the Bible. This sort of argument you provide has never been said about the SDA historical points of interest. Wonder why?

The immediate abandonment of the Sabbath by Early Christianity is completely consistent with the clear teachings of the Pauline Epistles, the Nuclear blast effect of the Resurrection, the Decree from the Council of Jerusalem outlined in Acts 15, a solid wall of unambiguous history, and the immense, inhuman and amazing courage those martyrs showed in the face of the most obscene and unimaginable persecution . The Sabbath was instantly obsolete with the Resurrection. It was of no importance whatsoever to the Early Christians. It was a non-issue. Nobody who witnessed the Resurrection ever kept the Sabbath again. There is a complete ABSENCE of record of ANY of those witnesses ever keeping the Sabbath again.

Sabbath Keepers are in a bit of pickle to explain all of this away. Ellen White's insane Papal conspiracy theory fairy tale is just absurd in the face of the courage and suffering of First, Second and Third Century Christians.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think he is. I rather like his prospective from history. I see that it complies with the Bible. This sort of argument you provide has never been said about the SDA historical points of interest. Wonder why?

There is NO compliance with the Bible saying I MUST adhere to uninspired authors. NONE. If you like that perspective that is fine with me and I do not appreciate gang-style attacks in that regard.

I do not comply with the SDA points, Scripturally speaking, and I have as much as said so. Yeah. I think Ellen G. White was a false prophet.

What I do NOT agree with is veiled assertions they, or anyone else, are not saved. I have yet to see an SDA come in here and DEMAND we see their point of view. I give THAT to their credit.
I did work for SDA before and their attitude there was VERY unpleasant. The one I had the MOST problem with said he had to be re-saved. I do not know where he got THAT from but I have no authority to question his salvation.

I have many faults and I do NOT need to add to them by ignoring the Word of God and place the teachings of others in its stead.

Thank you for asking.
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
There is NO compliance with the Bible saying I MUST adhere to uninspired authors. NONE. If you like that perspective that is fine with me and I do not appreciate gang-style attacks in that regard.

I do not comply with the SDA points, Scripturally speaking, and I have as much as said so. Yeah. I think Ellen G. White was a false prophet.

What I do NOT agree with is veiled assertions they, or anyone else, are not saved. I have yet to see an SDA come in here and DEMAND we see their point of view. I give THAT to their credit.
I did work for SDA before and their attitude there was VERY unpleasant. The one I had the MOST problem with said he had to be re-saved. I do not know where he got THAT from but I have no authority to question his salvation.

I have many faults and I do NOT need to add to them by ignoring the Word of God and place the teachings of others in its stead.

Thank you for asking.

So where did your brilliant idea come from that Christians have wrongfully abandoned the Jewish Sabbath? You implicitly charge Early Christians with some level of duplicity, ignoring the Bible, or outright heresy for Sabbath abandonment. How do you explain their incredible courage in the face of horrifying torture and unbelievably savage murder? What reason can you give that would explain why Early Christians - who eagerly withstood torture and death - would have cravenly apostatized on such an allegedly vital issue? And explain how Gentile Christians - who were absolutely barred from Sabbath Keeping by Jewish Law - completely escaped historical record as Sabbath Keepers? And how is it that YOU have been the one to discover mandatory Sabbath Keeping in the Bible, when billions and billions of Christians, with some of the most brilliant minds in history, that went before you never did?

The simplest and most obvious explanation? Christianity quickly abandoned Sabbath keeping as inconsistent with the Resurrection and because the Apostles told them to. And the Epistles are completely consistent with the Sabbath having NO importance for Christians. And because the Gentiles never have kept the Sabbath, since they were also prevented from doing so by Jewish Law. Not once is Sabbath Keeping positively recommended, endorsed, encouraged or commanded in the New Testament. What's your explanation?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So where did your brilliant idea come from that Christians have wrongfully abandoned the Jewish Sabbath? You implicitly charge Early Christians with some level of duplicity and heresy for Sabbath abandonment. How do you explain their incredible courage in the face of horrifying torture and unbelievably savage murder? What reason can you give that would explain why Early Christians - who eagerly withstood torture and death - would have cravenly apostatized on such an allegedly vital issue? And explain how Gentile Christians - who were barred from Sabbath Keeping by Jewish Law - completely escaped historical record as Sabbath Keepers? And how is it that YOU have been the one to discover mandatory Sabbath Keeping in the Bible, when billions and billions of Christians, with some of the most brilliant minds in history, that went before you never did?

The simplest and most obvious explanation? Christianity quickly abandoned Sabbath keeping as inconsistent with the Resurrection and because the Apostles told them to. And the Epistles are completely consistent with the Sabbath having NO importance for Christians. And because the Gentiles never have kept the Sabbath, since they were prevented by Jewish Law. What's your explanation?

I KNOW about the eighth day resurrection as a NEW BEGINNING. I did not start studying yesterday ya know.
You are babbling so much I do not know where to begin. You are accusing me of many things I have not said or taken them the wrong way.


When did I say I discovered mandatory Sabbath keeping in the Bible for Gentiles?

Nobody has a right to kill anybody over anything such as doctrine.

As a matter of fact...ISRAEL was in view the entire Acts period if you did not know. (Acts 1:6, 28:20) They STILL observed the law even after faith came. At Acts 28 the olive tree was hewn to the roots and THEN we have:

Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:

THAT is for the GENTILES

ANOTHER comparison:

Acts 10:35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Acts 28 right here

Titus 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Before you accuse me anymore you may well get your facts straight!

This thread is about the "Lord's Day" in Revelation and THAT is not Sunday...period.
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married


This thread is about the "Lord's Day" in Revelation and THAT is not Sunday...period.


Only if you want to ignore 100's if not 1000's of references in Early Church History that clearly define "The Lord's Day" as "Sunday."

How come John is the only person who took an extremely common term of First Century Christianity and gave it a totally unique definition?
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
re: "Not once is Sabbath Keeping positively recommended, endorsed, encouraged or commanded in the New Testament"


Hebrews 4:9 - "It is therefore the duty of the people of God to keep the sabbath.

:thumbsup: EXACTLY!! And THAT is before Acts 28 all the while Israel was in view. Up to Acts 10...JEW ONLY. AFTER that JEW FIRST and THEN the Gentile.

EVERYBODY needs to get a grip on EXACTLY what happened at Acts 28.

Thanky you rstrats!! Thank you!! :wave:

Now. Any more fiery darts??
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Hebrews 4:9 - "It is therefore the duty of the people of God to keep the sabbath.


WRONG!

Tricky scripture sculptor at work with the deceitful out of context verse game:

Hebrews 4
New King James Version (NKJV)

6 Since therefore it remains that some must enter it, and those to whom it was first preached did not enter because of disobedience, 7 again He designates a certain day, saying in David, “Today,” after such a long time, as it has been said:
“Today, if you will hear His voice,
Do not harden your hearts.
”[e]
8 For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day. 9 There remains therefore a rest for the people of God. 10 For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His. 10 For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His. 11 Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience.

Hebrews 4
New International Version (NIV)

6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief: 7 again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. 8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. 9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. 10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. 11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

Absolutely not a command to keep the Sabbath. Actually Christianity has always interpreted that verse as meaning that Christians have a rest EVERYDAY, no need for the Sabbath, since Jesus Christ IS our Sabbath and he did so by absolutely fulfilling the Sabbath. Which is particularly apt for the Gentile Christians since they never were allowed to Keep the Sabbath to begin with.

Nice try though.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Only if you want to ignore 100's if not 1000's of references in Early Church History that clearly define "The Lord's Day" as "Sunday."

How come John is the only person who took an extremely common term of First Century Christianity and gave it a totally unique definition?

It is about the SETTING of the book of Revelation. As a matter of fact John informed PAUL way earlier than the time it was actually written.
It was NOT Paul that was taken to the third Heaven in ...TIME...it was JOHN.
 
Upvote 0

By Faith Alone

Junior Member
Oct 17, 2013
2,738
87
✟25,792.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
WRONG!

Tricky scripture sculptor at work with the deceitful out of context verse game:

Hebrews 4
New King James Version (NKJV)

6 Since therefore it remains that some must enter it, and those to whom it was first preached did not enter because of disobedience, 7 again He designates a certain day, saying in David, “Today,” after such a long time, as it has been said:
“Today, if you will hear His voice,
Do not harden your hearts.
”[e]
8 For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day. 9 There remains therefore a rest for the people of God. 10 For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His. 10 For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His. 11 Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience.

Absolutely not a command to keep the Sabbath. Actually Christianity has always interpreted that verse as meaning that Christians have a rest EVERYDAY, no need for the Sabbath, since Jesus Christ IS our Sabbath.

Nice try though.


What was quoted there was several times in the Septuagint (sabbatizo)
Rest IS a Sabbath. That is what Sabbath actually means. THAT Sabbath points to the 1,000 year reign of Christ.


Zech 6:13 Even he shall build the temple of the Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.
 
Upvote 0