juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 72
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We do not know the reality.
Any "age" is meaningful someway somehow. It all depends on the degree of understanding. That is why I say this is the art of geological science.
Show how this is the case using U/Pb to date trees.
I am guessing that you can't, because you are just making stuff up at this point.
Let me tell you something you should know: The job of a scientist is to make stuff up. If I can not, then I am not a scientist.
That is not the job of a scientist, not even close. Are heart transplants made up, are vaccines made up, are power plants made up?
They are engineers, not scientists.
Even for them, be able to make up new thing is very very good.
-_- an engineer is a kind of scientist, especially if they are in development.
So, let them make stuff up and amaze all Loudmouths.
So, let them make stuff up and amaze all Loudmouths.
Let me tell you something you should know: The job of a scientist is to make stuff up. If I can not, then I am not a scientist.
Baloney.
Scientists are not making up the fact that zircons exclude Pb when they form. Scientists are not making up the fact that U isotopes decay at a constant rate. Scientists are not making up the ratio of U and Pb isotopes in zircons. Scientists are not making up the fact that U/Pb dating can not be used for trees because they all start with different amounts of Pb.
You are making up the fantasy that U/Pb can be used for dating trees.
That is the difference between you and real scientists.
Well, not living trees, anyways. Dating only works on dead stuff. And it only tells us how long ago it died, not how long it lived.
Baloney.
Scientists are not making up the fact that zircons exclude Pb when they form. Scientists are not making up the fact that U isotopes decay at a constant rate. Scientists are not making up the ratio of U and Pb isotopes in zircons. Scientists are not making up the fact that U/Pb dating can not be used for trees because they all start with different amounts of Pb.
You are making up the fantasy that U/Pb can be used for dating trees.
That is the difference between you and real scientists.
Everything you know was made up by someone at its very first time.
Everything you know was originally proposed by someone..
Yep....or, Everything you know was originally discovered by someone...?
U/Pb dating does not work on trees, living or dead. For live trees, you can simply bore out a sample and count the rings.
![]()