Is there a break in Daniel's 70 weeks? (Daniel 9:26)

Is there a break in Daniel's 70 weeks? (Daniel 9:26)

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
777
✟97,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Whether you are a preterist that believes Daniel's 70th 'seven' (week of 7 years) was fulfilled in 70 AD or a futurist that believes Daniel's 70th week is yet to be fulfilled, you must place a break in Daniel 9:26, between the end of the 69th week in 33 AD (when Jesus Christ was cut off) and the beginning of the 70th.

If you do not accept a break, where do you place the beginning and end of Daniel's 70 weeks?
Yes, there is a break.
You know what? There is a break in Enoch the prophet's prophetic parable of the ten weeks, also, breaking when Jesus ascends to heaven, and continuing only after the Church is raptured from the midst of the world!
 
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟20,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
"Find one person that the scripture says lost their salvation."

poor old Judas

so long Judas
hi

just so everyone knows, and weighs the options,
judas repented,
he tried to stop the crucifixion
and he was murdered (martyred) for it
we should all allow God to judge him, and to judge all of us

Incidentally - were the disciples LED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT to elect Matthias as a replacement?
Yes.
or was that just something "of man"?
no
Do we ever hear of Matthias DOING ANYTHING?
most of the disciples are not heard from individually in the NT, after the early Acts

was Paul really the "replacement disciple" or are there some

SECRET WORKS OF MATTHIAS that we should look for?
what is your hate-on for Matthias?
Paul did not replace Judas.

Matthias did, and he continued to go to the same brethren that the other disciples went to

Paul converted 3 years later at the martyring of Steven
and took the Good News not only to the Jews,
but also to the gentiles, and even to the kings and rulers of them.
 
Upvote 0

ebedmelech

My dog Micah in the pic
Site Supporter
Jul 3, 2012
8,998
678
✟187,689.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Daniel 9:26 shows these two events that are named after the 69th week, as well as before the 70th week.

Daniel 9:26 is the key to understanding.


JLB
Only if you ignore Daniel 9:24, which sets forth what is accomplished in the 70 weeks and shows no gap whatsoever. Even more...when God sets a time for something to happen there is never a gap.

He sent Israel into captivity seventy years...no gap...10 sabbatical years straight.

The seventy weeks are the same. Daniel 9:26 shows that AFTER 69 weeks messiah is cut off...your problem is demonstrating the 69th week stops anything. You can't show that because in 9:27 there's a covenant (not a peace treaty as dispensationalism teaches).

Jesus said "This cup is the blood of the covenant which is poured out FOR MANY".

Jesus is affirming Daniel 9:27 right there! The 69th week is past so it's the 70th week!
 
Upvote 0

yeshuasavedme

Senior Veteran
May 31, 2004
12,811
777
✟97,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
hi

just so everyone knows, and weighs the options,
judas repented,
he tried to stop the crucifixion
and he was murdered (martyred) for it
we should all allow God to judge him, and to judge all of us

...
Judas was not murdered or martyred! 'He committed suicide! - and Jesus already judged him; "it were better for that man that he had never been born", for Judas' sin was blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, when he, by his treason against the revelation of the knowledge that Jesus was the Christ, in flesh, sold his wherabouts and identified Him by kissing him, for His arrest.
Peter denied knowing Jesus out of fear for his life, and repented, but Judas willfully, with full knowledge and understanding of his deed against the Christ in flesh, sold him for 30 pieces of silver.

Paul also blasphemed Christ, but without knowledge that He was indeed the Christ in flesh, until he received the revelation of Him on the road to damascus, and was saved. Judas blasphemed with full will and understanding of the revelation he had received as one of the twelve Apostles of the LORD who received the power to perform the miracles of Christ. He knew who Christ was by the Holy Spirit, and blasphemed when he sold him. Jesus gave him personal warning, but Judas proceeded by his will to do the deed, and Satan then entered him.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
rollinTHUNDER said in post 196:

No one who has ever received Christ as their Savior will ever lose their salvation.

Note that no scripture teaches or requires that. Instead, the Bible shows that salvation can be lost (See post 173). But it will be lost only eschatologically. I.e. salvation won't be lost until the future judgment of the church by Jesus (2 Corinthians 5:10, Romans 2:6-8, Luke 12:45-48, Matthew 25:19-30) at his 2nd coming (Psalms 50:3-5, cf. Mark 13:27). Some saved people will lose their salvation at that time because of such things as unrepentant sin (Luke 12:45-46, Hebrews 10:26-29; 1 Corinthians 9:27), unrepentant laziness (Matthew 25:26,30, John 15:2a, Romans 2:6-8), or apostasy (Mark 8:35-38, Hebrews 6:4-8; 2 Timothy 2:12b). That's why saved people know the "terror" of the coming judgment of the church by Jesus (2 Corinthians 5:10-11), why they must remain in fear of being cut off the same as unbelievers if they don't continue in God's goodness (Romans 11:20-22, Luke 12:45-46), why they must be careful to work out their own ultimate salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:12b; 1 Peter 1:17, Romans 2:6-8).

rollinTHUNDER said in post 196:

Not even Satan has the power to pluck any out of Christ' hand, for He will not lose one (John 10:27-29).

Regarding "for He will not lose one", were you thinking of John 6:39-40? If so, resurrection in itself doesn't assure a resurrection to eternal life, for one can be resurrected to damnation (John 5:29). This applies even to the elect. For even though they all get initially saved at some point during their lifetime (Acts 13:48b, John 6:37a), and Jesus won't physically lose any of them, but will physically resurrect all of them (John 6:39), at his 2nd coming (1 Corinthians 15:21-23), some of them will be resurrected to damnation (John 5:29), to shame and everlasting contempt (Daniel 12:2), because of such things as unrepentant sin (Hebrews 10:26-29), unrepentant laziness (Matthew 25:26,30), or apostasy (Hebrews 6:4-8). Also, at the subsequent resurrection, at the great white throne judgment, those whose names aren't found written in the book of life will be resurrected only to be judged and cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:11-15).

rollinTHUNDER said in post 196:

Not even Satan has the power to pluck any out of Christ' hand, for He will not lose one (John 10:27-29).

John 10:28-29 means that saved people will never perish so long as they remain in God's hand, and that no one outside of a saved person can ever take him or her out of God's hand. But John 10:28-29 doesn't mean that saved people are imprisoned in God's hand, that saved people can't wrongly employ their free will to jump out of God's hand themselves, such as by committing apostasy, to the ultimate loss of their salvation (Hebrews 6:4-8, John 15:6; 2 Timothy 2:12). Also, John 10:28-29 isn't contradicting the fact that God himself can in the end cast saved people out of his hand, that they can in the end lose their salvation, if they don't continue in his goodness (Romans 11:20-22), such as by wrongly employing their free will to commit sin without repentance (Hebrews 10:26-29; 1 Corinthians 9:27, Luke 12:45-46), or to become utterly lazy without repentance (Matthew 25:26,30, John 15:2a, Romans 2:6-8).

Also, John 10:28-29 doesn't mean that a saved person's will is kept in God's hand in the sense that a saved person can't wrongly employ his will to the ultimate loss of his salvation. For any such "kept" will would be nothing but a destroyed will. It would make saved people like people who have been lobotomized and drugged and locked up in a cell. Thank God that he doesn't do that to saved people, but leaves them as free people with free will. And because he does, they themselves have to choose each and every day for the rest of their lives to deny themselves, to take up their crosses themselves, and to continue to follow Jesus (Luke 9:23) to the end. And the Bible gives no assurance that every saved person will choose to do that (Hebrews 10:26-29, Hebrews 6:4-8, John 15:2a).

rollinTHUNDER said in post 196:

Not even Satan has the power to pluck any out of Christ' hand, for He will not lose one (John 10:27-29).

Regarding "for He will not lose one", were you thinking of John 17:12 and John 18:9? If so, they don't mean that no saved person can ultimately be lost (as in, e.g. Hebrews 10:26-29), but refer only to none of the chosen/elect/saved 12 apostles (Luke 6:13) becoming lost, except Judas.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
JLB777 said in post 197:

I offer the parable of the sower as examples of those who received, yet for one reason or another lost what they received.

That's right.

In the sower parable (Luke 8:4-15), the last 3 types of people all received God's Word and came into faith. The one who came into faith on stony ground believed for awhile, but then subsequently committed apostasy (Luke 8:13; cf. 1 Timothy 4:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:3), which ultimately results in the loss of salvation (Hebrews 6:4-8, John 15:6; 2 Timothy 2:12b). The one who came into faith on weed-choked ground subsequently neglected to patiently continue in good works, neglected to bear fruit to perfection (Luke 8:14, Colossians 1:10, Revelation 3:1b-2). And the one who came into faith on good ground subsequently brought forth fruit with patience (Luke 8:15), which is required in order for believers to obtain ultimate salvation (Romans 2:6-8, Matthew 7:21, James 2:24), and not to ultimately lose their salvation (John 15:2a,6, Matthew 25:26,30).
 
Upvote 0

rollinTHUNDER

Veteran
Dec 30, 2001
1,936
13
Central Florida USA
Visit site
✟22,549.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Thank you brother for your passion.

Please help me to understand what you are saying here with the phrase no one who has received Christ....

I offer the parable of the sower as examples of those who received, yet for one reason or another lost what they received.

Therefore hear the parable of the sower: 19 When anyone hears the word of the kingdom, and does not understand it, then the wicked one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is he who received seed by the wayside. 20 But he who received the seed on stony places, this is he who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy; 21 yet he has no root in himself, but endures only for a while. For when tribulation or persecution arises because of the word, immediately he stumbles. 22 Now he who received seed among the thorns is he who hears the word, and the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and he becomes unfruitful. 23 But he who received seed on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands it, who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty." Matthew 13:18-23
Interesting question, JLB!

The parable of the sower shows how people accept the word when it is presented to them. Jesus gave the interpretation of their responses. However, in verse (9), Christ added, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear." This is an indication that a deeper interpretation can be found in this parable, if one is willing to seek for it. I used this parable in my book as well, as it actually confirms what I have been saying about the three different types or classes of believer. Each will be rewarded accordingly, when Christ appears.

The first thing I want to point out here, is that, if you notice carefully, there are four (4) different people groups. Only one of these four is an unbeliever, where as the other three (3) are some sort or type of believer.

Then, after Christ explained the interpretation of the crops that were yielded, He added this:
:some a hundred-fold, some sixty, some thirty.

100, 60 and 30 shows the crops of the different believers or the end result of their labor, meaning the rewards for their work. Now let's take a deeper look at these.

Seed Sown and its Position in the End
(1) ALONG THE PATH: [unbeliever] - hates the truth / takes the mark of the beast / goat
(2) ON ROCKY PLACES: [falls away]- weak believer / must try to survive after tribulation / sheep or poor in spirit
(3) AMONG THORNS: [lukewarm] - unfruitful / left behind, but repents later and refuses to take the mark / martyr
(4) ON GOOD SOIL: [disciple] - very fruitful / ready / will stand before the Son of man in the rapture

If you want an even deeper look, here's a scriptural interpretation of each type.

Scriptural Interpretation:

(1) SEED SOWN ALONG THE PATH: And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Thessalonians 2:10-12

(2) SEED SOWN ON ROCKY PLACES: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition.
2 Thessalonians 2:3

(3) SEED SOWN AMONG THE THORNS: Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you unexpectedly like a trap.
Luke 21:34

(4) SEED SOWN ON GOOD SOIL: Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
Revelation 3:10-11

GOOD SOIL = ready when the Son of man appears (greatest in kingdom)
AMONG THORNS = martyr / refuses mark of the beast (least in kingdom)
ROCKY PLACES = sheep / will repopulate the earth (protected mortal)
ALONG THE PATH = goats / killed in the fire of God's wrath (doomed)

Hundred-fold = Good soil
Sixty-fold = Among thorns
Thirty-fold = Rocky places
Nothing = Along the path

Unbelievers are the only ones who end up with nothing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟20,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Judas was not murdered or martyred! 'He committed suicide! - and Jesus already judged him; "it were better for that man that he had never been born", for Judas' sin was blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, when he, by his treason against the revelation of the knowledge that Jesus was the Christ, in flesh, sold his wherabouts and identified Him by kissing him, for His arrest.
Peter denied knowing Jesus out of fear for his life, and repented, but Judas willfully, with full knowledge and understanding of his deed against the Christ in flesh, sold him for 30 pieces of silver.

Paul also blasphemed Christ, but without knowledge that He was indeed the Christ in flesh, until he received the revelation of Him on the road to damascus, and was saved. Judas blasphemed with full will and understanding of the revelation he had received as one of the twelve Apostles of the LORD who received the power to perform the miracles of Christ. He knew who Christ was by the Holy Spirit, and blasphemed when he sold him. Jesus gave him personal warning, but Judas proceeded by his will to do the deed, and Satan then entered him.
we disagree as usual.

he was cut from top to bottom and hung on a tree
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rollinTHUNDER

Veteran
Dec 30, 2001
1,936
13
Central Florida USA
Visit site
✟22,549.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Sure, there's a break in Daniel's 70 weeks. I just don't think that means there is a 7-year tribulation.

The so-called seven year tribulation is a huge misconception. However, there still remains a final period of seven years or Daniel's 70th week, that has not yet been fulfilled.
 
Upvote 0

rollinTHUNDER

Veteran
Dec 30, 2001
1,936
13
Central Florida USA
Visit site
✟22,549.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
That's right.

In the sower parable (Luke 8:4-15), the last 3 types of people all received God's Word and came into faith. The one who came into faith on stony ground believed for awhile, but then subsequently committed apostasy (Luke 8:13; cf. 1 Timothy 4:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:3), which ultimately results in the loss of salvation (Hebrews 6:4-8, John 15:6; 2 Timothy 2:12b). The one who came into faith on weed-choked ground subsequently neglected to patiently continue in good works, neglected to bear fruit to perfection (Luke 8:14, Colossians 1:10, Revelation 3:1b-2). And the one who came into faith on good ground subsequently brought forth fruit with patience (Luke 8:15), which is required in order for believers to obtain ultimate salvation (Romans 2:6-8, Matthew 7:21, James 2:24), and not to ultimately lose their salvation (John 15:2a,6, Matthew 25:26,30).

The parable of the sower is not compatible with your ultimate salvation theory, but it fits mine like a glove. In fact, I'd even say it confirms my theory.

Again, there are three (3) different rewards for believers (see post #207).
__________________
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
rollinTHUNDER said in post 214:

The parable of the sower is not compatible with your ultimate salvation theory, but it fits mine like a glove.

Actually, the parable of the sower is compatible with the Bible's teaching that salvation can ultimately be lost, for the reasons given in post 206 and post 173. Also, the idea of ultimate salvation isn't just a theory, but is fully supported by scripture (see the 3rd section of post 192).

rollinTHUNDER said in post 214:

Again, there are three (3) different rewards for believers (see post #207).

Note that Matthew 13:23 and Mark 4:8 are clear that the 30, 60, and 100-fold fruit applies only to that fruit (i.e. good works) brought forth by those believers on good ground.

*******

rollinTHUNDER said in post 207:

(2) ON ROCKY PLACES: [falls away]- weak believer / must try to survive after tribulation / sheep or poor in spirit

Regarding "sheep", see the 2nd to last section of post 193.

rollinTHUNDER said in post 207:

(3) AMONG THORNS: [lukewarm] - unfruitful / left behind, but repents later and refuses to take the mark / martyr

Regarding "left behind", see the last section of post 193.

rollinTHUNDER said in post 207:

(4) ON GOOD SOIL: [disciple] - very fruitful / ready / will stand before the Son of man in the rapture

Regarding "ready", see the 1st section of post 193.

Regarding "will stand before the Son of man", note that Luke 21:36 doesn't require a pre-tribulation rapture, for some in the church will escape all of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 by dying before it begins (Isaiah 57:1), and others in the church will escape all of it by being physically protected on the earth during it (Revelation 12:14-16, Psalms 91). Those who will escape it by dying before it begins will stand before the Lord in heaven (Philippians 1:21,23; 2 Corinthians 5:8). And those who will escape it by being miraculously protected on the earth during it will stand before the Lord in the sky at the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4:17), which won't occur until immediately after the tribulation (Matthew 24:29-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8; Revelation 19:7 to 20:6).

rollinTHUNDER said in post 207:

(4) ON GOOD SOIL: [disciple] - very fruitful / ready / will stand before the Son of man in the rapture

Regarding "in the rapture", that will only be at Jesus' 2nd coming, for the reasons given in the 3rd section of post 193.

rollinTHUNDER said in post 207:

(4) SEED SOWN ON GOOD SOIL: Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
Revelation 3:10-11

Regarding Revelation 3:10-11, the 7 epistles to 7 churches in Revelation chapters 2-3 were sent to 7 literal, first century AD local church congregations in 7 cities in the Roman province of "Asia" (Revelation 1:11) (what's today western Turkey).

Revelation 3:10 meant that the literal, first century AD local church congregation in the city of Philadelphia (Revelation 3:7) in the Roman province of "Asia" (Revelation 1:11) would be kept safe from a persecution which came upon all the Roman world during the time of the Roman emperor Domitian. For the apostle John saw his Revelation vision (Revelation 1:1) near the end of Domitian's reign (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5:30:3c), and Domitian persecuted the church toward the end of his reign. The righteous, literal, first century AD local church congregation in the city of Smyrna (Revelation 2:8) in the Roman province of "Asia" (Revelation 1:11) had to suffer and die in that persecution over a period of 10 literal days (Revelation 2:10).

The first century AD church in Philadelphia didn't have to be taken out of the world to be kept safe from (Greek: "ek") that persecution. For, as Jesus prayed for the church in general: "I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from (ek) the evil" (John 17:15,20). Also, the first century AD church in Philadelphia didn't have to be removed from time itself, or from the earth, in order to be kept from the "hour" (or the "time") of that persecution, just as, for example, a student in a classroom who has been excused from taking a test doesn't have to be removed from time itself, or from the classroom, in order to be excused from that time of testing. For he can be made to sit at his desk reading during that time, which won't be a time of testing for him.

Also, the first century AD persecution of Revelation 3:10 (and Revelation 2:10) was only "world"-wide in the sense of the Roman "world" (cf. Luke 2:1). So the subsequent reference to those on the "earth" in Revelation 3:10 should be understood as those Christians living on the earth during that time in the Roman Empire, as opposed to those Christians who had already died and gone to heaven (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:8, Philippians 1:21,23).

Also, while Revelation 3:10 (like Revelation 2:10) was fulfilled in the first century AD, Jesus' 2nd coming spoken of in Revelation 3:11 hasn't yet been fulfilled. For it won't occur until Revelation 19:7-21, immediately after the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18 and Matthew 24 (Matthew 24:29-31; 2 Thessalonians 2:1-8). Also, even though some 2,000 years will have passed between the time that Revelation 3:11 was spoken in the first century AD and the time of the fulfillment of the 2nd coming in our future, Jesus will still come "quickly" (Revelation 3:11), just as all the preceding events of the future tribulation (Revelation chapters 6 to 18) will unfold "shortly" (Revelation 1:1,3) after John saw his vision. For from the viewpoint of God even the passing of some 2,000 years is like the passing of only two days (2 Peter 3:8). Christians should look at the future fulfillment of Revelation chapters 6 to 19 from the viewpoint of God, not men, for whom the passing of some 2,000 years seems like a long delay for its fulfillment (2 Peter 3:9).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Just The Facts

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jul 26, 2003
4,939
109
63
Visit site
✟80,681.00
Faith
Non-Denom
This prophecy is the most misunderstood prophecy in all of Christianity.

Ask yourself some very simple questions.

Why did none of the Apostles and Saints reference this prophecy as proof that Jesus was the Messiah?

I mean come on according to modern interpretation of this prophecy it gives us the exact year of Jesus' birth. And yet not once is it used to prove to early Christianity that Jesus was the Messiah. We have them referring to the Town, the family tree, The virgin Birth, and a dozen other scriptures. yet this prophecy that supposedly tells us the exact year is not mentioned AT ALL......NOT ONCE. WHY????????

If the Apostles and Saints did not use this Chapter the way Modern Christians do when did Christianity start to use this prophecy in this way?

The Answer is this interpretation was first presented by Jerome in the 4th century. It is Jerome that argues that Cyrus decree is not the decree to count from because the Jews where prevented from building by the nations around. The totality of the arguments of today's advocates of this doctrine were created and first presented by Jerome.

So how did the early church fathers (prior to the fourth century) see this chapter?

Well that is the curious thing they just do not refer to it very often but when the do they always and I DO MEAN ALWAYS teach the prophecy as TOTALLY FULFILLED by Jesus's death in fact most say fulfilled by Jesus' birth.

There are so many things Jerome changed in this prophecy to make it fit his NEW interpretation it stagers the mind. Lets not forget that Jerome was the man who created the Latin Bible. His task was to create a Translation in Latin that backed the Official Catholic understanding of Scripture. For centuries Scholars have been showing how many things got changed or altered by Jerome.

So what did he change?

First this is the first seven weeks and the second 62 weeks are not combined. So that means the Prince the anointed one comes after 49 years not 483 years.

the RSV has the correct translation

[25] Know therefore and understand that from the going forth of the word to restore and build Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one, a prince, there shall be seven weeks. Then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again with squares and moat, but in a troubled time.

The other translations such as the KJV read.

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:

Now the KJV took much of its translation from the Vulgate which was created by Jerome. Just in this verse alone you can see how much was changed.

First the 7 and 62 are combined Second instead of Anointed one Jerome Translated it as Messiah. then he further twists the verse by Saying "THE Prince" instead of A Prince".

Now if we look at other later translations we see they have abandoned some of the changes but they hold onto the primary errors because when you do a proper translation as done by the RSV you can not see this as being a prophecy about Jesus.

NIV

25 "Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven 'sevens,' and sixty-two 'sevens.'

Now when we look at the Hebrew original we see a clear break between the 7 and the 62. There are two clear thoughts in this verse. One after 7 weeks the Anointed one will come. Then for 62 weeks the city will be rebuilt. Each period of time has an event associated with it.

When you use Cyrus' decree and do not try and change the decree date to fit your interpretation and when we do not combine the 7 and 62 the whole prophecy falls in line with real history in a way that is astonishing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

Time Watcher

Guest
Sorry, but I don't buy your story for many reasons

If you want to know why and have reasonable comments and questions I may respond

The prophetic word of the Lord on this matter has not changed

And I will also tell you that the few early Israelite followers of Jesus Christ did have access to and believed in Daniel's record of the 70 weeks of years [70 360 day prophetic years] .... it was the balance of Israel that rejected their Messiah and King and still do today for the most part
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Just The Facts

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jul 26, 2003
4,939
109
63
Visit site
✟80,681.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Hello Time Watcher

Well first off it is not a story. It is a Fact. I have provided the evidence to show what I am saying is true. You responded with you don't buy it and provided no facts to back your position. If you have facts please present them.

Of course you do not buy it. You have been taught your current understanding and your eyes are shut to anything that threatens that understanding.

You need to look at the question asked of God.

[2] in the first year of his reign, I, Daniel, perceived in the books the number of years which, according to the word of the LORD to Jeremiah the prophet, must pass before the end of the desolations of Jerusalem, namely, seventy years.

So he is asking when will the punishment of the Jews be over. The |Jews have broken the covenant. According to the covenant God can and will punish them. Jeremiah tells them they will be punished 70 years. According to the covenant when they are taken captive they must repent of their sins. If they fail to repent further punishment can be added.

Jer:25[4] You have neither listened nor inclined your ears to hear, although the LORD persistently sent to you all his servants the prophets, [5] saying, `Turn now, every one of you, from his evil way and wrong doings, and dwell upon the land which the LORD has given to you and your fathers from of old and for ever; [6] do not go after other gods to serve and worship them, or provoke me to anger with the work of your hands. Then I will do you no harm.' [7] Yet you have not listened to me, says the LORD, that you might provoke me to anger with the work of your hands to your own harm. [8] "Therefore thus says the LORD of hosts: Because you have not obeyed my words, [9] behold, I will send for all the tribes of the north, says the LORD, and for Nebuchadrez'zar the king of Babylon, my servant, and I will bring them against this land and its inhabitants, and against all these nations round about; I will utterly destroy them, and make them a horror, a hissing, and an everlasting reproach. [10] Moreover, I will banish from them the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, the grinding of the millstones and the light of the lamp. [11] This whole land shall become a ruin and a waste, and these nations shall serve the king of Babylon seventy years.

Let me ask you a simple question. Why is the answer 490 years?

[24] "Seventy weeks of years are decreed concerning your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place.

God decrees 490 years as an answer to Daniels Question. WHY?????????

Do you know and understand Why?
 
Upvote 0