• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Now, please explain to our liberal feminist friends here who believe that women should be treated equally to men, why it is wrong for a man to punch a woman more so than a man punching another man?
It is equally wrong in both cases.
Okay. Then for you, equal rights mean equal lefts. That is your choice. Fix your own car and do your own repairs. Personally, if I see you on the side of the road with a flat tire, I will pull over and ask if you have a spare. Of not, I will give you the number for a tow company. If yes, I will drive on assuming you know how to change your own tire by yourself.
Fix your own car and do your own repairs? Who does that any more? It's not your responsibility as a man any more than it is for a woman. Does your manhood depend on your ability to change a tire?
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Did I say that anywhere? Equal rights for equal lefts…?
Again I ask, "Should women be treated equally with men or not?" Being treated equally with men implies that men will confront you and fight you like a man.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Here comes the stone throwing :sigh:. No room here for alternate theories.

If you want an alternate theory to be accepted, you need to present evidence for one. The theory of evolution has evidence, otherwise it wouldn't be a theory. Do you understand this very simple fact?
  • Like
Reactions: FaithT
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Pride has nothing to do with this, I can't believe you can even think something like that. If I see something that I don't agree with (theory of evolution) I'm going to point out what I can and use whatever evidence I have. Simple as that, no pride involved anywhere. I sometimes feel though most evolutionists are so connected to their theories that they do not want to see or hear anything contradicting them (that could show flaws in the theory, now that in my eyes is pride).

But you are admitting it is a pride thing. You going "If I see something that I don't agree with (theory of evolution) I'm going to point out what I can and use whatever evidence I have." Ignoring the latter (which you have done nothing of sort, just making baseless claims with no real evidence behind it apart from wishful thinking on your part), your entire thing is that YOU don't agree with it. Not that science is wrong, not that it's a religious thing: just that YOU don't agree with it.
How is that not prideful?
  • Like
Reactions: River Jordan
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Okay. Then for you, equal rights mean equal lefts. That is your choice.
Did I say that anywhere? Equal rights for equal lefts…?
Fix your own car and do your own repairs.
Uh… I do fix my own car…? I just changed the power steering fluid on my car last week. And I do the home repairs around the house.

Personally, if I see you on the side of the road with a flat tire, I will pull over and ask if you have a spare.
You don’t need to, I do.
Of not, I will give you the number for a tow company.
No need. I have USAA.
If yes, I will drive on assuming you know how to change your own tire by yourself.
Good, because I do and wouldn’t want you to stop because apparently you randomly punch people.

You may need to stop for my husband, though, because I’m not sure he could change a tire. Also, probably my father. He can change a tire, but he’s in his 70s with arthritis and can’t move around so well. Be sure to tell them their wife/daughter is more of a man than they are. They’ll get a kick out of that. Don’t literally kick them though, please. As we established, they’re men and have it rough.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Here comes the stone throwing :sigh:. No room here for alternate theories.
Um, isn't that what the guys in the video are doing? Aren't they just throwing rocks at origins researchers while not offering anything positive as an alternative?

I'll ask again, what exactly do they want? And why do they think any origins researchers care what they think about their work?
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

It isn't? Both are equally wrong. The only time you should be punching someone (outside of martial arts competition/training, I guess) is in defending yourself or someone else from another person's assault. And whether you're being assaulted by a woman or a man isn't really relevant.
Nope. Although both are wrong, they are not both equally wrong. For example, a man approaches another man and spits in his face only for the man to knock him out. Compare that to a woman spitting in a man's face only for the man to knock the woman out. Which is worse?
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

It's weird because what exactly do they want? Those guys think origin of life researchers should do what? Shut down all their research just because those three guys think it's a waste of time?

Why do those guys think researchers care at all what they think? Talk about having an inflated sense of self-importance!
Here comes the stone throwing :sigh:. No room here for alternate theories.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Boy, are you condescending. I wouldn't think anyone an idiot for thinking that. There are many people who feel aliens did start the whole life here on Earth. The Sumerians laid out some very impressive cuneiform tablet stating those same thoughts.
You're missing the point. Within the sciences young-earth creationism has about the same status as flat-earthism and the advocates for both are thought of in about the same terms, if at all.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

If nothing else, you're demonstrating that you've still not learnt anything from this thread and seem to be proud of it.
Pride has nothing to do with this, I can't believe you can even think something like that. If I see something that I don't agree with (theory of evolution) I'm going to point out what I can and use whatever evidence I have. Simple as that, no pride involved anywhere. I sometimes feel though most evolutionists are so connected to their theories that they do not want to see or hear anything contradicting them (that could show flaws in the theory, now that in my eyes is pride).
Upvote 0

Who is really responsible for Salvation?

These are nice sentiments but they ignore scripture. Here are just a few.
The Bible speaks very directly about the fate of those who persist—deliberately and continually—in rejecting God. The theme is consistent across the Old and New Testaments: ongoing, willful rejection of God leads to separation from Him and ultimately judgment.

Here’s a clear summary with supporting verses:

1. They remain under God’s wrath

John 3:36 – "Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him."

Persistent rejection doesn’t just forfeit blessings—it leaves a person under existing condemnation.

2. They will face eternal separation from God

2 Thessalonians 1:8–9 – "…in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His might."

This is one of the clearest NT statements that rejection of God results in everlasting exclusion from His presence.

3. They will be judged according to their deeds

Hebrews 9:27 – "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment."

Revelation 20:11–15 – "…And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done… And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire."

4. God gives them over to their own choices

Romans 1:18, 24, 26, 28 – "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth… Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts…"

Persistent rejection leads to God allowing them to follow their desires, which results in deeper moral and spiritual ruin.

5. They cannot claim ignorance—God has revealed Himself

Romans 1:20 – "For His invisible attributes, namely, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived… so they are without excuse."

6. They will not inherit the kingdom of God

Galatians 5:19–21 – "I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God."

Revelation 21:8 – "But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable… their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death."

While it is true that the natural man has no free will, the spiritual man does and he can reject the purpose of God for him. Jesus makes it clear in John 3:19 that the basis of Judgement is what we love. "And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil."

Here’s what it’s teaching:

1. The “light” refers to Jesus

In John’s Gospel, light is a recurring metaphor for truth, holiness, and the revelation of God (John 1:4–5, 8:12).

Jesus coming into the world is the decisive moment of God’s truth and salvation being made available.

2. The judgment is based on response to the light

This isn’t judgment in the sense of God arbitrarily condemning people—it’s the reality that people’s reaction to Jesus reveals their spiritual state.

The coming of light exposes hearts for what they are.

3. People’s rejection is rooted in love for sin

The reason given is not intellectual disagreement but moral preference: “people loved darkness rather than the light.”

Darkness means ignorance of God, falsehood, and sin.

This shows rejection of God is a willful choice, driven by affection for sin rather than a lack of evidence.

4. Evil deeds create hostility toward God’s truth

Light exposes evil (John 3:20). Those committed to sinful lifestyles resist exposure and thus reject Christ.

This explains why the gospel meets not only apathy but sometimes hostility—truth unmasks sin, and many prefer to hide.
Dear Mercy Shown,

You said:
The Bible speaks very directly about the fate of those who persist—deliberately and continually—in rejecting God. The theme is consistent across the Old and New Testaments: ongoing, willful rejection of God leads to separation from Him and ultimately judgment.

All mankind in their natural state will always reject Christ and will always disobey Him. If you can't accept this simple truth, you are not going to understand why the spiritual process of conversion is necessary for a person's salvation.

Here is mankind's natural state of being:

Rom 3:10 As it is written, there is none righteous, no, not one: 11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

Rom 8:7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

1Cor 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Rom 8:20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.


Because all mankind has sinned, all mankind has become the children of the Devil (1John 3:8-10). As a result, all mankind is "condemned already" because of their sin (John 3:18). Nothing can change that fate that awaits them as John 3:36 states. Because death is the fate that awaits all mankind, it is necessary for Christ to convert all the children of the Devil into the children of God BEFORE they perish from the penalty of the Law.

This change is mankind's salvation and is solely Christ's work to perform.

The change from being a child of the Devil into being a child of God is what Christ does to save a person. The spiritual process that Christ uses to make this change is called conversion.

Conversion from a child of the Devil into a child of God cannot be seen with human eyes because it is a spiritual change. This truth is what Christ was teaching in the verse below:

Luke 17:20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

By the end of the final age, Christ will have converted all mankind into the children of God. After the last person of mankind has been converted, 100% of the children of the Devil will have perished in the Lake of Fire.

As the verse below states, only a person who has the indwelling of the Holy Spirit can call Jesus "Lord". These people are the children of God.

1Cor 12:3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Spirit.

If you can't understand the concept of conversion, you are not going to understand many of the New Covenant teachings of Christ.

All six points that you listed in your post about the children of the Devil are true. I have never stated differently. But what you are missing is that Christ will convert all the children of the Devil into the children of God prior to the child of the Devil's destruction. You don't seem to understand the spiritual process of conversion and why it is necessary for salvation.

I will respond to one more of your comments.

You said:
While it is true that the natural man has no free will, the spiritual man does and he can reject the purpose of God for him.

The natural man is a child of the Devil. This applies to all mankind. The spiritual man is a converted believer. He is no longer a natural man because he has been converted. I will go with the assumption that you understand them in this way.

So you believe that the natural man does not have a free will ability??? I'm puzzled because that belief seems to contradict some of what you have written in your posts. However, that understanding is true. No one has a free will ability.

Let me ask you this: Since the natural man has no free will ability to be able to have faith in Christ and accept Him as Lord (per the verses I quoted at the start of this post), what must happen to the natural man to change him into a believer?

Could it be that Christ must give the natural man the Holy Spirit so that the natural man will become a spiritual man who accepts Christ? And since the natural man does not seek after God or understand Him, it is necessary for Christ to give the Spirit to the natural man without his asking or permission.

1Cor 12:3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Spirit.

The "spiritual man" is a converted believer who is a child of God. He has been given both the Early and Latter Rains of the Spirit, followed by judgment. It is this judgment that destroys the natural man (a child of the Devil who disobeys God). Because the spiritual man is governed by the Holy Spirit, they will never reject the "purpose of God for him". And just like Christ, the spiritual man is willing to lay down his life rather than disobey God.

Contrary to your beliefs though, the spiritual man does not have a free will ability. He walks by the Spirit and only does what the Spirit directs him to do. As I have stated, only God has a free will ability.

Joe
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Be prepared to be shocked… Yes, despite your fixation with determining when it’s apporpriate to punch a woman in the face, I still think women deserve to be treated equally.
Okay. Then for you, equal rights mean equal lefts. That is your choice. Fix your own car and do your own repairs. Personally, if I see you on the side of the road with a flat tire, I will pull over and ask if you have a spare. Of not, I will give you the number for a tow company. If yes, I will drive on assuming you know how to change your own tire by yourself.
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Login to view embedded media
I'm sure most of you will throw rocks at this video and call the people in it all sorts of derogatory names (because they are challenging the status quo). But again this is here for those other people who want to know what the flaws are with the theory of evolution (and cannot get it from the Google search because Google search is in the same side as alot of these stone throwing scientists).
It's weird because what exactly do they want? Those guys think origin of life researchers should do what? Shut down all their research just because those three guys think it's a waste of time?

Why do those guys think researchers care at all what they think? Talk about having an inflated sense of self-importance!
Upvote 0

Historicity of the change of the Sabbath Commandment

You are correct. You did not quote any scripture at all to support your position. You seem to believe that your mishmash of theology is sufficient to rebut scripture, which I did quote.
You are mistaken. Chapters 11, 10 and 12 of Hebrews was quoted in context which refutes your stance. And then Philippians 2 was also quoted showing you took that chapter out of context.

Maybe next response you can forgo the insults and just answer the points shown through the context. Thanks.
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Now, please explain to our liberal feminist friends here who believe that women should be treated equally to men, why it is wrong for a man to punch a woman more so than a man punching another man?
It isn't? Both are equally wrong. The only time you should be punching someone (outside of martial arts competition/training, I guess) is in defending yourself or someone else from another person's assault. And whether you're being assaulted by a woman or a man isn't really relevant.

Not hitting a woman out of "chivalry" rather than the simple concept that "assault is wrong" is pretty disturbing, not gonna lie. It's like those who tell you that their Christian faith is the only thing stopping them from raping or murdering people. Like, I'm glad you're not doing that, but that fact that religion is the only thing stopping you and not - y'know - your conscience? That suggests there's something very wrong with you.
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Now, please explain to our liberal feminist friends here who believe that women should be treated equally to men, why it is wrong for a man to punch a woman more so than a man punching another man?
You would like me to explain why I think it’s wrong to assault people…? You think feminists don’t already know why assault is bad…?
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

There are people today who think Jesus was an alien. They get laughed at. In the past they’d get slung in jail or killed for wrong think.

Being laughed at is the natural consequence of being an idiot.
Boy, are you condescending. I wouldn't think anyone an idiot for thinking that. There are many people who feel aliens did start the whole life here on Earth. The Sumerians laid out some very impressive cuneiform tablet stating those same thoughts.
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

Are you surprised that modern feminist women who demand to be treated equally with men may find themselves being treated equally with men when they disrespect a man? Priceless.
Are you asking if I’m surprised there are men who would punch a woman in the face for saying something “wrong” to a man, no, I’m not surprised.

Surprised to see somebody advocating for it so openly? A little.

Surprised that it’s being done by somebody who just quoted a Bible? Not as much as I should be.

Surprised to see it here? Openly? Without reproach from anybody but the “liberals” and usual dissenters of the forum? That one has me a bit surprised.

But in general, I find nothing you’re say particularly insightful or provocative. This isn’t my first time seeing a guy advocating for violence against women under the guise of equal rights or justifying violence against women, online or in person. It isn’t even my 100th time. Frankly, you’re not blazing any trails not blazed before you or saying anything new.

At this point, as I said, I’m seeing how deep you’re willing to go down the pit and making notes on who is… And isn’t… Saying anything to you about it.
Upvote 0

Trump Moves To Rid Smithsonian Of Left-Wing Spin, Highlight American History

Wait, I thought installing a ballroom was to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't it installing patio in the Rose Garden done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't it dealing with crime in DC done change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't meeting with Putin done to change the subject away from Epstein..
Or wasn't appointing Jeanine Pirro to US Attorney for DC to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't redistricting Texas done to to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't the Big Beautiful Bill done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't the Nvidia chip deal to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't immigration enforcement done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't declassifying the JFK files done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't firing Erika McEntarfer done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't starting DOGE done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't placing tariffs done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Or wasn't it anything and everything Trump has said or done said or done to change the subject away from Epstein.
Man, you're so close to getting it.
Upvote 0

Hegseth Boosts Video of Pastors Saying Women Shouldn't Vote, Advocating Repeal of 19th Amendment

There is, sadly, no shortage of men who would punch a woman in the face (or otherwise abuse her) over a perceived slight. And I would posit that the overlap between men who would punch a woman for such a thing and men who would punch another man for disrespect is rather large. I can say that I - as a man - have never been punched (in the face or otherwise) for disrespecting someone either, and the last time that I punched someone myself in anger, I was about twelve.
Now, please explain to our liberal feminist friends here who believe that women should be treated equally to men, why it is wrong for a man to punch a woman more so than a man punching another man?
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Login to view embedded media
I'm sure most of you will throw rocks at this video and call the people in it all sorts of derogatory names (because they are challenging the status quo). But again this is here for those other people who want to know what the flaws are with the theory of evolution (and cannot get it from the Google search because Google search is in the same side as alot of these stone throwing scientists).

If nothing else, you're demonstrating that you've still not learnt anything from this thread and seem to be proud of it.
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

How should have Christians historically addressed Islam?

Islam is a progressive religion and, in the view of Muslims, simply a continuation of Judaism and Christianity. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are called Abrahamic faiths because they each trace their lineage specifically to Abraham. If you ever plan to witness to a Muslim and you start out by trying to convince them that Islam is not an Abrahamic religion, you will push them even further away from Christ than they already are.
How do you convince them It was Isaac, not Ishmael....... the son of promise to Abraham?
Upvote 0

Is Western world suffering from a 20th century idolatric system where it has the main role ?

Let's assume i was a poor living in the developping world last century.
I had an idolatric vision of the western world, through TV and other medias i could watch by chance.
How disappointing it should have been for me to come into one of these country, and observe everything was far from a James Bond movie, and that most people have to work hard to make one's living, even in the western world.
The latters have yet an informative message on their TV program, where the 'entertainment' mention warns them all the James Bond movie was a fiction

Is it possible, on this basis, that many persons in the developped country, even some politics, have dreamt to imitate the TV irreality ?
I think, if my assumption is correct, that the misunderstanding ought to be removed

What's your feeling, please ?

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Login to view embedded media
I'm sure most of you will throw rocks at this video and call the people in it all sorts of derogatory names (because they are challenging the status quo). But again this is here for those other people who want to know what the flaws are with the theory of evolution (and cannot get it from the Google search because Google search is in the same side as alot of these stone throwing scientists).
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,873,245
Messages
65,331,135
Members
276,093
Latest member
Heavens7778