• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

YECs and Tar Pits

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This argument works for the entire geologic column. The fossil record conforms beautifully to the principle of faunal succession no matter where you're looking or what taxa you deal with. The fossil record is very very heavily sorted - science explains this by saying that it's sorted with respect to time, YECs have absolutely no explanation.

The research I'm doing for my dissertation is completely dependent on the reality of faunal succession. If all vertebrate animals who have ever lived all coexisted 6,000 years ago then the patterns I look at every day would not exist. You wouldn't see an orderly change from one fauna to another over time, it would be a giant jumbled mess.

Where did the geologic layers come from that buried those critters?
 
Upvote 0
A

Andy 998

Guest
Where did the geologic layers come from that buried those critters?
I think this post is about the animals in the Tar Pits not geologic layers, there are no geologic layers in the Tar Pits only Tar, the animals went onto the Tar and slowly sank, predators saw them struggling and went onto the Tar to eat them they then slowly sank themselves, very few things that went onto the Tar survived.
 
Upvote 0

troodon

Be wise and be smart
Dec 16, 2002
1,698
58
40
University of Iowa
Visit site
✟24,647.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Where did the geologic layers come from that buried those critters?
I am talking about layers, and they came from every sort of depositional environment imaginable - river systems, lakes, near-shore and far-shore marine, etc. Why do you ask?
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I am talking about layers, and they came from every sort of depositional environment imaginable - river systems, lakes, near-shore and far-shore marine, etc. Why do you ask?

Are these layers of material different for each epoch? Are the layers identified more by the composition of the strata or the fossils they contain?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Then how do you explain the fact that only Pleistocene fossils are found there?
"Pleistocene" is just a word to describe a unit of time inhabited by a subset of life that existed in a figment of scientists' imagination.

In truth, man and "Pleistocenes" lived together.

Adam & Eve probably had some as pets.

How "only" these found their way into asphalt lakes is anybody's guess.

I would assume the animals that were not found therein, were not found therein because they would have never made it to them in the first place.

They would have been eaten before they got there.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes you are.
No.
You believe that the earth was created only 6,000 years ago, therefore, a "young" earth.
You left out a very important key qualifier, didn't you?

I believe a 4.57 billion year old earth was created only 6000 years ago.

And may I point out that you are a Presbyterian that believes the books of Moses are a fairy tale?
 
Upvote 0

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
"Pleistocene" is just a word to describe a unit of time inhabited by a subset of life that existed in a figment of scientists' imagination.

In truth, man and "Pleistocenes" lived together.

Adam & Eve probably had some as pets.

How "only" these found their way into asphalt lakes is anybody's guess.

I would assume the animals that were not found therein, were not found therein because they would have never made it to them in the first place.

They would have been eaten before they got there.

Except animals from before and after that period that inhabited the same ranges and occupied the same ecological niches are not found there...
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
"Pleistocene" is just a word to describe a unit of time inhabited by a subset of life that existed in a figment of scientists' imagination.

A unit of time, yes. To describe a subset of life that existed during that time, NO. The Pleistocene is a period of time from 2.588 Ma to 11.7 ka. in which there were multiple glaciations.
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
No.

You left out a very important key qualifier, didn't you?

I believe a 4.57 billion year old earth was created only 6000 years ago.

You can't have it both ways. Besides, it makes God a deceiver.

And may I point out that you are a Presbyterian that believes the books of Moses are a fairy tale?

I have never called them fairy tales nor will I ever. I just do not believe them to be literal nor fully factual. Can you provide archeological evidence of any Hebrews being slaves in Egypt during the reign of Ramses? Not to mention your interpretation of the creation story has God being a deceiver creating an earth and all its contents and history 6,000 years ago made to look 4.5 billion years old.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I believe a 4.57 billion year old earth was created only 6000 years ago.

You have also been shown that this requires God to plant fake fossils in the ground, and yet you keep pushing the same idea.

Even though Kingsley wrote the following to Phillip Henry Gosse of "Omphalos" fame, he could have been writing it for our very own AV.

"Shall I tell you the truth? It is best. Your book is the first that ever made me doubt the doctrine of absolute creation, and I fear it will make hundreds do so. Your book tends to prove this - that if we accept the fact of absolute creation, God becomes God-the-Sometime-Deceiver. I do not mean merely in the case of fossils which pretend to be the bones of dead animals; but in ...your newly created Adam's navel, you make God tell a lie. It is not my reason, but my conscience which revolts here ... I cannot ...believe that God has written on the rocks one enormous and superfluous lie for all mankind. To this painful dilemma you have brought me, and will, I fear, bring hundreds. It will not make me throw away my Bible. I trust and hope. I know in whom I have believed, and can trust Him to bring my faith safe through this puzzle, as He has through others; but for the young I do fear. I would not for a thousand pounds put your book into my children's hands"--Charles Kingsley
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Except animals from before and after that period that inhabited the same ranges and occupied the same ecological niches are not found there...
If they are not found there, how do you know they inhabited the same ranges and occupied the same ecological niches?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
A unit of time, yes. To describe a subset of life that existed during that time, NO. The Pleistocene is a period of time from 2.588 Ma to 11.7 ka. in which there were multiple glaciations.
Okay, thanks for the correction.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
No -- that is called Last Thursdayism.

That is exactly what your embedded age nonsense requires. You claim that rocks date to millions of years because they have embedded age from the creation event, and then you forget that those rocks have fossils in them meaning that those rocks had to be created with fossils already in them.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have never called them fairy tales nor will I ever.
Again, thanks for the correction.
I just do not believe them to be literal nor fully factual.
Thanks for the clarification.
Can you provide archeological evidence of any Hebrews being slaves in Egypt during the reign of Ramses?
45
Not to mention your interpretation of the creation story has God being a deceiver creating an earth and all its contents and history 6,000 years ago made to look 4.5 billion years old.
That's not even worth addressing.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,023
52,626
Guam
✟5,144,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That is exactly what your embedded age nonsense requires. You claim that rocks date to millions of years because they have embedded age from the creation event, and then you forget that those rocks have fossils in them meaning that those rocks had to be created with fossils already in them.
Then you agree I'm not a YEC?
 
Upvote 0