Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, if the rewriting is done based upon evidence and discoveries.Don't you think it's hubris for scientists to rewrite the history of the earth & universe to match their own standards, then claim the the history book they rewrote it from is bogus and/or flawed?
Not that Satan- type supernatural intelligence is needed by the "creation scientists" to defraud earnest but ignorant
Christians with their shabby lying pseudoscience.
No, if the rewriting is done based upon evidence and discoveries.
The Creation story that scientist are opening up comes directly from the Earth and Universe itSelf. That's the standard . And it's way more accurate than an old and outdated Creation story that came from an ancient middle-eastern tribe of desert dwellers.Don't you think it's hubris for scientists to rewrite the history of the earth & universe to match their own standards, then claim the the history book they rewrote it from is bogus and/or flawed?
Nope...I don't believe either is possible.And if YEC is physically impossible, then it's divinely possible, I take it?
The Creation story that scientist are opening up comes directly from the Earth and Universe itSelf.
Evidence, please.and some claim to have even developed a blue print in creating a universe with life in a lab.
The paradigm is way different then is the Biblical account.Do most scientists who open up that creation story from the earth believe it?
If so, they are creationists, are they not?
The Bible is not bogus or flawed. It can only be considered so if it is not true to its purpose. The only thing that science shows us is that the necessity of using the literal inerrancy assumption to understand that purpose may be bogus or flawed.Don't you think it's hubris for scientists to rewrite the history of the earth & universe to match their own standards, then claim the the history book they rewrote it from is bogus and/or flawed?
Again, raising the issue of the existence of God or of His ultimate authorship of our being is a red herring in these discussions. Science does not address the issue one way or the other.Do most scientists who open up that creation story from the earth believe it?
If so, they are creationists, are they not?
Again, raising the issue of the existence of God or of His ultimate authorship of our being is a red herring in these discussions. Science does not address the issue one way or the other.
Huh?The Bible is not bogus or flawed. It can only be considered so if it is not true to its purpose. The only thing that science shows us is that the necessity of using the literal inerrancy assumption to understand that purpose may be bogus or flawed.
Initially that may have been true. The systematic study of geology was begun in the 18th century by scientists--many of them Christian clergymen--who had set about looking for geological evidence of the flood. Much to their disappointment, they couldn't find any, have never found any. Nowadays, science proceeds without any reference to the Book of Genesis at all.But according to lamb, scientists are opening up the creation story.
That makes you guys creationists.
And yes, I'm on record as showing from Wikipedia that evolutionists are indeed creationists.
But lamb is taking it to another level, in that he is giving you guys credit for "opening up" the creation story, using evidence from the earth and the universe to do so.
Initially that may have been true. The systematic study of geology was begun in the 18th century by scientists--many of them Christian clergymen--who had set about looking for geological evidence of the flood. Much to their disappointment, they couldn't find any, have never found any. Nowadays, science proceeds without any reference to the Book of Genesis at all.
Not in the slightest. Stay on topic please.Here's a picture of Noah's Ark Restaurant in Teaneck, NJ:
View attachment 342905
Does New Jersey ring a bell?
Science does not deny the existence of God or the value of the Bible as a divinely revealed religious text. The only thing that the findings of science cause difficulties about is the assumption that the Book of Genesis must and can only be a fully accurate historical account of our origins.Huh?
They did.You'd think they'd go back and look again with updated equipment.
Nope, the geology of the Earth is under constant study.Unless, of course, they wrote it off after looking only once or twice.
-I am sure she is impressive in the science world and a hero to people who believe in sciences creation they have created, over the last 2000+ years.
C'mon now. You're a rational guy. You should know that just pretending you've never heard of New Jersey will not make New Jersey go away.Not in the slightest. Stay on topic please.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?