- Aug 11, 2017
- 25,866
- 8,386
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Right so if Luke being a Gentile was to say the same statement and it wouldn’t change the definition then Paul being a Pharisee has nothing to do with the meaning of that statement.It wouldn't. It's scripture and therefore I believe it
You skipped posts 579 & 580The passage says from one Sabbath to another, not from one day to another
Isa 66:23And it shall come to pass
That from one New Moon to another,
And from one Sabbath to another,
All flesh shall come to worship before Me,” says the Lord.
The saints are not going to be coming before the Lord 24/7 in the New Heaven and New Earth as scripture tells us the saints will be working - attending to vineyards and building houses.
Monday through Friday is not one Sabbath to another and one Sabbath to another is not from day to day or from one day to another.You skipped posts 579 & 580
Did you read verse 21? Surely you know what the term “some of them” means. I even quoted it for you,Monday through Friday is not one Sabbath to another and one Sabbath to another is not from day to day or from one day to another.
Scripture shows the saints will be working in the New Earth/New Heaven tending to vineyards building houses, so it appears a similar week cycle God gave man on earth- work six days, rest the seventh day Sabbath and keep it holy continues. Exo 20:8-11 Sabbath is not disappearing in heaven and will be a glorious day when all the saints gather around the Lord for worship Isa 66:23, just like in the garden before sin separated man from God. Gen 2:1-3 Mark 2:27 Gen 1:26 Since sin separated us from His presence, we should be worshipping Him in His Spirit from one Sabbath- to another keeping His Sabbath day holy as His will for us in heaven is the same for us now. Mat 6:10
Ok in proper grammar usage when an action is said to take place FROM one time TO another that ALWAYS includes all the time between those two times. It means that every single time. My 10 year old daughter with a 4th grade education understands this.Monday through Friday is not one Sabbath to another and one Sabbath to another is not from day to day or from one day to another.
Scripture shows the saints will be working in the New Earth/New Heaven tending to vineyards building houses, so it appears a similar week cycle God gave man on earth- work six days, rest the seventh day Sabbath and keep it holy continues. Exo 20:8-11 Sabbath is not disappearing in heaven and will be a glorious day when all the saints gather around the Lord for worship Isa 66:23, just like in the garden before sin separated man from God. Gen 2:1-3 Mark 2:27 Gen 1:26 Since sin separated us from His presence, we should be worshipping Him in His Spirit from one Sabbath- to another keeping His Sabbath day holy as His will for us in heaven is the same for us now. Mat 6:10
I go to church from one Sabbath to another, but I do not attend church daily. Does that delete the days I do not attend church, no of course not, so you're not making an argument I'm making. Going through this again is not going to make a difference, so I am okay leaving it as agree to disagree. This gets sorted out soon enough.Ok in proper grammar usage when an action is said to take place FROM one time TO another that ALWAYS includes all the time between those two times. It means that every single time. My 10 year old daughter with a 4th grade education understands this.
Huh? Whar are you talking about? If Luke said Paul was a Pharisee and of the tribe of Benjamin and circumcised on the eighth day it would make a difference? How?Right so if Luke being a Gentile was to say the same statement and it wouldn’t change the definition then Paul being a Pharisee has nothing to do with the meaning of that statement.
No you don’t because that statement is not grammatically correct as I’ve already pointed out and even quoted a grammar website. The word FROM indicates the point of origin or beginning. The word TO indicates the point of destination or end. You know this because you’ve used these words correctly before in these posts.I go to church from one Sabbath to another, but I do not attend church daily
Reading the bible from cover to cover is all that is needed to understand God's Truth. That is just an example of how people can unlearn the lies that have been handed down to them. We are only sanctified by the Truth of God's Word John 17:17 and only God can sanctity us. Eze 20:12
Like I said, I am not the one that you need to convince.
Exodus 20:9 seems to indicate otherwise
and does Exodus 20:8-11
If you can point to the scripture that says this. I have read the Bible from cover to cover and there is no scripture that says the first day is holy. God only made the seventh day holy which does starts Friday evening and goes for a full 24 hours.
The word you keep wanting to remove that provides the context is from one Sabbath to another. I already explained this:No you don’t because that statement is not grammatically correct as I’ve already pointed out and even quoted a grammar website. The word FROM indicates the point of origin or beginning. The word TO indicates the point of destination or end. You know this because you’ve used these words correctly before in these posts.
There is not a single Bible version that agrees with you. Not one. I'd say all those linguists have a much better grasp of how to translate from Hebrew to English than you do.No you don’t because that statement is not grammatically correct as I’ve already pointed out and even quoted a grammar website. The word FROM indicates the point of origin or beginning. The word TO indicates the point of destination or end. You know this because you’ve used these words correctly before in these posts.
You’ve explained it incorrectly because as I’ve proven it’s not grammatically correct and the word “another” isn’t in the Hebrew text, not that it makes any difference, but I already pointed that out to. So when you said you read the Bible from cover to cover that means you only read the front cover and the back cover of your Bible? No it doesn’t and you know this.The word you keep wanting to remove that provides the context is from one Sabbath to another. I already explained this:
I go to church from one Sabbath to another, but I do not attend church daily.
Seems easy enough.
You haven't proved any such thing. Not a single Bible version agrees with youYou’ve explained it incorrectly because as I’ve proven it’s not grammatically correct and the word “another” isn’t in the Hebrew text, not that it makes any difference, but I already pointed that out to. So when you said you read the Bible from cover to cover that means you only read the front cover and the back cover of your Bible? No it doesn’t and you know this.
We’re talking about correct grammar usage.You haven't proved any such thing. Not a single Bible version agrees with you
The Bible isn’t a grammar book so no it doesn’t contain any verses explaining how the words “from” and “to” are used correctly in a sentence. However the link I posted to both you and her is a grammar website and does explain their usage.There is not a single Bible version that agrees with you. Not one. I'd say all those linguists have a much better grasp of how to translate from Hebrew to English than you do.
“And it shall be from new moon to new moon And from sabbath to sabbath, All mankind will come to bow down before Me,” says the Lord.”You haven't proved any such thing. Not a single Bible version agrees with you
Perhaps you haven’t read post 599 yet brother.Oh. So every Bible translator was wrong and you are right.
I read ir, multiple timer. and every Bible versui disagrees with your reading of the Hebrew. I have 47 versions of the Bible on my laptop and not a single version agrees with you so the rest are extremely unlikely to.Perhaps you haven’t read post 599 yet brother.
OkI read ir, multiple timer. and every Bible versui disagrees with your reading of the Hebrew. I have 47 versions of the Bible on my laptop and not a single version agrees with you so the rest are extremely unlikely to.