Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Shelb5 said:He did not create a Church of people for Himself. He raised up the Jewish people so that they may bring salvation to the rest of the world.
God has mercy on whom He wills and he hardens who he wills. This verse has a much larger scope to it than just God picking and choosing who will be saved and who won?t.
He chose us first, we respond and HE, HIM, God, Himself, no one else, but God allows that choice.
Michelle, with all due respect, what you're saying makes no sense. If divine justice has been COMPLETELY SATISFIED then every single person is going to Heaven. The wrath of God against the sin of man is the reason that people go to hell. It is by His Word that the price for any sin is death. According to you that price has been paid. Therefore, God cannot justifiably condemn anyone for any sin. You act as if the transaction of salvation was made between the Father, the Son and you. It wasn't. It was a covenant of grace established by the Godhead. You were not involved in the decision making, nor were your works involved in the outcome.Shelb5 said:There is no injustice, Christ paid it all. God is pleased, He can show mercy on who he wills, He can harden whom he wills. Divine justice has been completely satisfied.
Wrong. Salvation is the result of the gift. The gift is the sacrificial atonement, Jesus' death. You are NOT the receiver of the gift. God receives the gift. That's why Jesus' death was a propitiation TO GOD.A Muslim, a Jew, a who ever, has had his sins atoned for by Christ- Christ died for them and he died for us and salvation is promised to them, salvation is promised to everybody, but it is a gift.
In order for a gift to be a gift, there has to be a receiver or it is not a gift. Salvation is the gift; we are the receiver who has the free will to choose to accept that gift or to ignore it.
Let's see who is glorified in your scenario. God brings all people to a place where they are capable of making a decision. Then, it's on us. Guess what Michelle, if it's on us, it's not glorifying to God. If everyone gets the same grace, as you contend, then it is not God that is the defining difference. It is you. God did nothing for you that He didn't do for someone else, right? Why did you embrace His Truth and others don't? Let me help you out here. If you're saved because you made the choice to be saved by accepting the sacrifice of Christ then it wasn't Christ that is directly responsible for your salvation, it's your choice to accept His sacrifice. Without you making that choice you would not be saved.God does not have to regenerate someone in order for them to choose Him. He gives the prevenient grace to all souls that is sufficient and it makes a soul capable of accepting the grace of justification but the soul is not forced to choose or made to choose, the soul is free to choose.
So said Erasmus, the humanist. Ironically, these are the very words of Jacob Arminius, the man whose views were condemned at Dort as heretical.Our souls are not born in such a state that we can not respond to Grace. We were not destroyed in the fall, rendered void of any grace, rendered incapable of responding to God with out Gods help.
reformationist said:Michelle, with all due respect, what you're saying makes no sense. If divine justice has been COMPLETELY SATISFIED then every single person is going to Heaven.
Wrong. Salvation is the result of the gift. The gift is the sacrificial atonement, Jesus' death. You are NOT the receiver of the gift. God receives the gift. That's why Jesus' death was a propitiation TO GOD.
Let's see who is glorified in your scenario. God brings all people to a place where they are capable of making a decision. Then, it's on us.
So said Erasmus, the humanist. Ironically, these are the very words of Jacob Arminius, the man whose views were condemned at Dort as heretical.
I'm fine with you saying that one must be reborn to get into Heaven. However, it's a contradiction to say that God is completely satisfied and then acknowledge another condition. Either the satisfaction is complete, which means nothing else is required, or it's not. According to what you're saying, it's not.Shelb5 said:No. They need to be born again if they are going to be in heaven.
God monergistically rebirths them by His power while they are still dead in their trespasses and sins and blind to the spiritual things of God.How does on become born again?
Okay Michelle. I'll go ahead and break the cycle. Salvation is a gift.No, youre wrong, salvation is the gift.
Well, if you believe that all Jesus' death did was satisfy divine justice for original sin then it's no wonder that we disagree on every other point of doctrine.Jesus death was to satisfy divine justice. And it did. Adams sin displeased God and Jesus sacrifice pleased Him more than Adams sin displeased Him. The forgiveness of personal sins comes after we are forgiven original sin.
I agree.The only person ever capable of glorifying God is Christ and He did when he was obedient unto death.
Same old, same old, huh? I don't believe God makes anyone choose Him in the robotic way that you're implying. I believe God changes our spiritual polarity when He regenerates us. Prior to His doing so we were inclined to serve our sin. When He regenerates us He creates in us a desire to serve Him in obedience. If you believe that's "making someone choose Him" then so be it. I understand that you'd rather the decision be yours and I also understand why you'd rather the decision be yours. It all stems from your belief about the effects of the Fall.No it is not on us, it is freely chosen by us. How does God get glorified if a person was not free to choose Him but made to chose Him?
Justice? JUSTICE??!!! Do you honestly want God to give you justice for your treasonous acts against Him?How is justice just when a person is only doing according to you what they are made to do, not what they choose to do?
Does that even make sense to you? You need grace to respond to grace?? What enables you respond to the grace that enables you to respond to the grace? Let me guess...grace? That's an endless cycle that makes no sense because at some point we either have to acknowledge that God gives us irresistable grace that enables us to respond to the grace which enables us to respond to the grace, and so on, or we have to profess that sinful man responds to the grace without any proceeding grace. The point is, you believe that God enables ALL people ever created to embrace the Gospel by granting them previent grace, right? That grace is given unilaterally so we cannot credit God with the result of that grace in the lives of believers because to do so would force us to blame God for the ineffective grace in the lives of unbelievers. So, we can only view previent grace as grace that frees us from the bondage of our depravity but does not actually save us. Basically, it just puts us in a position where we are able, but not assured, of choosing to serve the Lord. So where does the credit lie for choosing Christ if all got the same measure of previent grace? With the creation. You believe that glorifies God?No I dont think so. The fall wounded our nature but it did not render it dead. We can respond to grace, but not with out grace of course.
See, now, this isn't what you say you believe. You have always professed that this prevenient grace CAN lead man to conversion. Here you say that the grace that He gives us DOES lead to conversion. Which is it?God chooses us, we dont chose Him. He gives us prevenient grace that leads man to conversion.
Okay.Humans have free will to chose their path and God will premove Him according to His foreknowledge. This is more along the lines of The Dominican or Thomist view.
reformationist said:I'm fine with you saying that one must be reborn to get into Heaven. However, it's a contradiction to say that God is completely satisfied and then acknowledge another condition. Either the satisfaction is complete, which means nothing else is required, or it's not. According to what you're saying, it's not.
God monergistically rebirths them by His power while they are still dead in their trespasses and sins and blind to the spiritual things of God.
Well, if you believe that all Jesus' death did was satisfy divine justice for original sin then it's no wonder that we disagree on every other point of doctrine.
Same old, same old, huh? I don't believe God makes anyone choose Him in the robotic way that you're implying. I believe God changes our spiritual polarity when He regenerates us.
Justice? JUSTICE??!!! Do you honestly want God to give you justice for your treasonous acts against Him?
Does that even make sense to you?
Shelb5 said:Why do you think he is willing to forgive original sin when we don?t deserve it?
Monergistically? Can you explain what this means?
Jesus paid the debt that Adam made. Do you really disagree?
He also forgives a man of any personal sin he may commit when the man repents, do you disagree?
I do not have a problem with you saying that God converts the soul, I believe He does but I do not believe that choice is limited to us responding with out the option of rejecting.
He breaths grace in every soul sufficient enough and the conversion begins when the person turns from their sin when convicted and turns to God.
If I had not been delivered from original sin then His justice would be all I would get but Christ died and I have been born again through the waters of baptism and into Christ so I escape that justice and I always have the right to ask for mercy.
Would it be just for God to save a evil person?
Yes, it does because original sin was us losing grace and becoming a slave to sin. Do you think you have been freed from being a slave to sin?
Christ atoned for the disobedience of Adam and that justifies, it does not deliver us from the human condition, the human condition is, we will still sin personally even through original sin is gone forever.
An adult has God?s grace on Him through His life to repent of His sins and to accept the truth of the gospel that Jesus is Lord and we must be born again through Him in order to have our personal sins forgiven.
He has the calling to repent, why does God allow this man graces if He has not been born again?
Because Christ died for all men, sent down the Holy Spirit and it is God?s will that all be saved so he calls.
That is the grace a unbeliever receives from God and when the man responds to this calling, God grants the soul additional grace of conversion, the man responds, and he is born again as he accepts Christ has savior.
The Holy Sprint then remains with Him convicting Him of his sins and then man although ?saved? continues to respond to the Holy Spirit's council or the man closes himself up in his sins and ignores the calling to repent of the sin that has brought evil to his soul. Unto death God hardens the heart of this man.
reformationist said:Everything about your beliefs revolves around man's ability to respond. If man responds correctly, God gives him more grace. If man responds incorrectly, God hardens his heart. Truly pitiful.
Shelb5 said:Truly pitiful? Try truly beautiful.
If you believe that God to you must chose to save some in order to be glorified then knock your self out, that is your God given right to believe what ever you want, but I so happen to think differently based on what I believe is taught in the bible.
Grace is Jesus coming and dying for mankind and sending the Holy Spirit to us. The grace is the Holy Spirit convicting us of our sins and the grace is repenting when convicted and then grace is us coming to believe and when we believe grace is then accepting Christ as our savior and being born again in Him. Grace is also ensuring our salvation when we persevere until the end.
If all that grace God grants to a sinner, who did nothing to deserve it, is pitiful to you then you are certainly entitled by your God given right to be entitled to think that.
After we have been born again Paul say that we have been crucified with Christ, that we died with Him and so everything post regeneration is untied to the cross of Jesus Christ and everything we do in Him is a grace from God. We pray, it is redemptive, we forgive, it is redemptive, we offer the other cheek and give our cloak away, it is redemptive, we help those in need, it is redemptive.
You call that pitiful, I call that beautiful.
Reformationist said:For those of you who believe God never intended for these vessels to be "vessels of wrath created for destruction" but rather they just turned out that way, why do you believe He "went ahead and created them?"
Reformationist said:I never said the grace of God was pitiful. I was referring to your interpretation of God's ability to bring about His own desires. You credit man with more power than you do God.
Either way, do you not have a comment for the rest of my post? I spent quite a bit of time putting it together. The least you could do is address the various points I made.
I agree that all of that happens by the grace of God. I've never professed otherwise.Shelb5 said:As I previously stated grace Jesus is being sent to atone for man's sin, grace is Jesus sending us the Holy Spirit so we will be convicted, grace is God's calling man to repent, grace is repenting, grace is converting, grace is accepting Christ as savior and Lord of your life, grace is trusting in mercy until your last day that Christ forgives you your sins, grace is repenting when we sin, grace is persevering until the end.
I agree with this as well.I credit man with nothing and God with everything because if it were not for God granting man such graces, no one would be saved
I also agree with all of this. I never said man didn't respond. I never said that some don't reject God. All I've ever said is that all of this happens by sovereign ordination of God.but what you have to accept from us as a valid explanation is that man does respond or he does reject and that is Gods will- God ordained mans choice and God allows the choices man has made. Nothing happens outside his will.
I'm not sure I understand your sentence but I would just clarify that I do not believe that there is a possibility that someone whom God has brought to a saving knowledge of Himself by the regenerative power of the Spirit of God is morally able to reject that knowledge and live a life void of a desire to serve God. I think all people, saved and unsaved, sin. But I do acknowledge that God is greater than man and able to overcome man's obstinacy. I don't think He does this by "overpowering" man. I think He does it by giving them a new spirit that desires to do His will. In effect, He lovingly changes their spiritual polarity when He regenerates them and indwells them. I don't consider that "forcing" man to comply. I think the work of God in His sovereign, monergistic act of regeneration creates in man a desire to submit to God that cannot be overcome, nor does man want to overcome it. Serving the Lord in obedience becomes man's greatest desire thanks to the indwelling nature of the Holy Spirit.What you do not have to do is believe but you can stop acting as if that is not a valid explanation because if God says so, anything then becomes valid.
I'll concede that I often, especially when discussing things with you, fall into that catagory. I would like to point out that it is my opinion that God often reveals to us the faults of others because we suffer from that same weakness. Take that how you will.I apologize for that but I am finding your same pattern immerging which is obstinate in not being willing to discuss to learn and understand properly one another, but to debate whether I am right or not.
Michelle, if you are too weak in your faith to either avoid the discussions I post or engage in them in a godly way then that is something you must learn to overcome. I have never tried to force you to partake in any discussion, nor could I.I am not on trial and I do not have to prove to you that I am right and I am not going to be made to feel as if I must.
"The wall" is not intentional, if there even is one. As for the rest of the above quote, I'll pass on commenting.I am only trying to give what ever little knowledge I do have and what ever insights I may have and offer what ever explanation I can and answer what ever honest questions you may ask. I would much rather if you stop building the wall around you and you would come from around it to understand properly that I am not humanistic, universalistic, or Armenian but, Catholic-- Latin Rite and my views are that of the Catholic Church and of no other and if you would understand properly what I am explaining you would then come to see that Catholics do not glorify Gods sovereign choice, we glorify him through His son, our Lord Jesus Christ.
"Through him, with Him, in Him, in the unity of the Holy Spirit all glory and honor is yours almighty Father forever and ever- Amen.
I completely agree seebs. Except for one thing. When we come to the 'end of ourselves' as I've heard it put. When a person has tasted of most of this world and tried to find happiness in all *things* or maybe in work or play or whatever this world has to offer. When they have come to the end of their rope and realize they are missing the simple joys in life and the fruits this life has to offer that are most important yet overlooked by so many (love, trust, selflessness, etc.) At that point people decide to *freely* give their life over to God. It is their choice to give up their choice. And no matter how the road may turn they trust that it is God's sovereign will. Just read about Joseph. God told him He would rule over many and then he found himself in a pit, in jail, etc. Yet, what God said held true and he was blessed beyond his wildest dreams. Now, many of us could care less about ruling anyone or anything. We just want to lead simple, happy, loving, giving lives, but we cannot do that without God's direction. It is not within us without Him in us. I know you know all of this, but it begs the question, are you ever going to be willing to be His puppet? (as you put it)seebs said:I believe He creates us free, and that we are the ones who end up determining our own fates, within the framework He created. Any other answer strikes me as a sort of sadistic puppet show.
And this, IMO, is the crux of the issue. Here you say that God creates you with the inherent ability to accept Christ and say yes to Him. Before you acknowledged that accepting the grace of God requires grace. These seem incongruous. If you have the inherent ability to do something you don't need God's help to do it. That is not to say that His help isn't beneficial. I'm just saying that the idea that we have the inherent ability to do something conflicts with your previous statements that we need God's grace to do it. It's either already part of our makup or God must give us help. If it is already part of your makeup then it would seem to credit God. However, we run into a major problem bacause you are not crediting God for the choice you actually make but rather just for the ability to make that choice. Therefore, the decision you actually make is the product of your will, not God's grace.Shelb5 said:I am glad we can agree that it is by grace that we are saved but the simplicity of what we believe is that we do not read in the bible that God performs a miracle in our minds to have us accept salvation from Him. We see that God created our minds already with the ability to accept Christ and say yes to Him.
Where does it say that post Fall man has the moral freedom, apart from the grace of God renewing his mind, to acknowledge and submit to Christ's Lordship?We can not be charged with the accusation that man is given too much credit because it is God who created us the way he did.
Do you believe that that separation was always a part of God's plan?We believe that God made us for Himself and what sin did was separate us from Him sharing His life with us.
Honestly, do you think it's glorifying to God to imply that He came to earth, dwelled amongst His creation, and died a heinous death so that sins may be forgiven? Do you believe that God knew as a certainty that sins would definitely be forgiven? The idea that the Godhead did all that they did so that created man may be forgiven is not glorifying to God. It calls into question so many things about God's sovereign nature. Tell me Michelle, was there ever a possibility that every single person ever created would accept Christ as Lord and Savior?With out the shedding of blood there could be no forgiveness of sins. Christ is the lamb who shed His blood for the remission of sins, not specifically for a group of people but "so that sins may be forgiven."
What is it that we're saying "yes" to?God's mercy gates are wide open now because of our lord, Jesus. Our minds can say yes when God calls because Jesus paid the debt in full. The Holy Spirit is released on earth to convict the world of its sin.
I don't know what that means. Can you explain?There is a saying in Catholicism, the 'Devil got it right'. He said to Adam and Eve, "surly you won't die, you will be like gods yourself, knowing what is good and evil."
Seriously...take your time. Use punctuation and try to form coherent sentences. It helps people understand what you're trying to say.We did not die in nature we were separated from God that brings the punishment of eternal separation and we lost our gifts and now our nature is weaken from the sickness we call sin.
It's difficult but not impossible? Hmmm... Scripture clearly tells us that carnal man CANNOT do ANYTHING to please God (Rom 8:8). So what is carnal man? Carnal man is someone who is not indwelt with the Holy Spirit(Rom 8:9). "Cannot" is not a reference to permission Michelle. It is a direct reference to ability. Unregenerate man is INCAPABLE of doing anything pleasing to God. It is IMPOSSIBLE for unregenerate man to do anything to please God?God indeed created all our minds capable of making the choice to say yes but sin makes it difficult. Sin made it hard, not impossible.
If grace is "needed" then we were not created with the ability to accept Christ and say yes to whatever it is you think we say yes to.Grace is needed in order to say yes and it is there for all men and it always was.
Biblical evidence of what, God's grace? Are you saying that the above example is the "beginning of God's grace on man?" What about this:The very beginnings of God's grace on man and his love and calling to all men is recorded in Genesis, this is also know as the very first prayer and best describes prevenient grace.
God goes looking for Adam and calls out to Adam "Where art thou?" Notice, Adam was wounded from his sin and is ashamed and hides from God but what does God do? He looks for him and calls out to him and what does Adam do, he responds to Gods call, I was naked. Your biblical evidence is right there but you have every right to disagree.
No. I don't think that's pathetic. I never said that was pathetic. Stop putting words in my mouth. What I find pathetic is the view that God universally calls ALL people to repent becaue He desires that every person ever created be saved but then is unable to make that come to pass, or He chooses to not ensure that it comes to pass. IMO it's irrational to believe that God would set Himself up to be that disappointed, not to mention the picture of impotence it paints of God's ability to accomplish His own desires.But this is what we believe, that we hide from God because of the shame of sin and God calls to us and we respond. You think its pathetic, I say it is beautiful.
reformationist said:These seem incongruous. If you have the inherent ability to do something you don't need God's help to do it
Scripture clearly tells us that carnal man CANNOT do ANYTHING to please God
Seriously...take your time. Use punctuation and try to form coherant sentences. It helps people understand what you're trying to say.
You say our nature is weakened, right? What does that mean to us? Are we just more suseptible to sinning? What does "weakened" mean in this context?
You say grace is there for all men and it always has been, right? Does grace ever fail to accomplish the purpose for which God gives it?
Biblical evidence of what, God's grace? Are you saying that the above example is the "beginning of God's grace on man?" What about this:
Genesis 1:26-28
Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Then God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth."
No. I don't think that's pathetic. I never said that was pathetic. Stop putting words in my mouth.
What I find pathetic is the view that God universally calls ALL people to repent becaue His desire is that every person ever created be saved but then is unable to make that come to pass,
I never said that God wasn't in control. What I said was that it is contradictory to say that we have the inherent ability to do something but are unable to do it without God's help. Either we are naturally able to do it because it's part of how we were created or we need God's grace to be able to do it, which would make it NOT inherent to us.Shelb5 said:How is God not in control here by creating us this way and that is for Himself?
So God, the Almighty Creator who, by His power, created man to be exactly what he is, created man to be with Him but many don't end up with Him. In what way does that glorify God? On the contrary, it speaks of a Creator that created man for a specific purpose, to be with Him, but that purpose will never be realized.We were created to be with Him. He created us to be with Him plain and simple.
You don't think saying "yes" pleases God??!!I did not say we can please God I said he calls and we can say yes.
I'm not twisting anything Michelle. I'm quoting your exact words.With out the sacrifice of Christ nothing we do will please Him. I specifically, many times have explained this. You are twisting my explanation to say things that they do not say and I wish you would stop debating and twisting but just listen to the explanation.
Well, let me help. Here is your sentence with proper punctuation and spelling:What is incoherent about this? We did not die in nature we were separated from God that brings the punishment of eternal separation and we lost our gifts and now our nature is weaken from the sickness we call sin
What??!!! It's one big run on sentence. What do you mean there's nothing wrong with it?There is nothing wrong with this sentence and I am becoming put off by your criticism.
You complain because I don't try to understand. I asked you to take your time and make sure your sentences make sense and now you are ticked off because I'm trying to understand? Make up your mind Michelle.Please stop detracting from the issue by critiquing my English.
LOL!!! ROTFLOL!!! I hate to break the news to you but look at the time of my last edit: 10:38 AM. Look at the time of your post: 11:13 AM.Ps, you spelled coherant wrong, it is spelled coherent.
I never said man's choice was removed. What I said, and what I've always said, is that man's nature is so completely affected by the Fall that THE CHOICE HE ALWAYS MAKES prior to regeneration is a sinful one.That sin made us depraved where will be inclined to lean towards evil. Lacking in self-control, good judgement. All because sin has darkened our intellect, and weakened our will and removed self control ONLY in matters of morality, we as St. Paul describes beautifully do what we dont want and dont do what we do want. Further biblical evidence that mans choice was never removed from him but man now struggles against his own self.
The primary purpose of God in everything He does is His own glory.What is Gods purpose to you?
You don't consider the actual creation of man to be God's grace towards humanity?Yep. I am. Adam sins, runs away and God goes looking for Him and then asks "Where art thou?" and Adam ashamed but answers still, "I was naked." That is the first prayer and we see God reaching out to fallen man by looking for Adam and then by calling out to Him. You really going to tell me that is not a correct way to interpret this?
This verse teaches that we are made in the image and likeness of God and our bodies reflect the image of the trinity where God says He created him; male and female He created them. We reflect the image of the trinity when the two become one and bring forth life form that union just as the father and the Son are one in nature who from their love flows the Holy Spirit.
Ahhh yes. The disappointed God. There's a new picture of God that will show His magnificence and bring Him glory.But who are you to say that this is unacceptable to God if he so wills this for Himself? Gods a big boy Im sure he can handle disappointment if He finds it best to have us freely choose.
LOL! I wouldn't be content believing what you believe because it subordinates God's immutable plan to man's "choice." I do believe that man freely makes whatever choice he makes. I just believe that there's a reason he makes that choice. If he is unregenerate then his corruption considers God an enemy. Therefore, he freely rebels against God's Law. If he is regenerate the Holy Spirit has indwelt him and inclines him to his new Father, the Lord Himself.Cant you just be content understanding and accepting from God that this His will that we freely make the choice? God granting that we freely choose to say yes does not mean that God does not sovereignty controls the universe. Geessh. God has no limits he can create us to chose and still be in control at at the same time. Stop putting Him in a box determining what he can and can not do.
reformationist said:I never said that God wasn't in control. What I said was that it is contradictory to say that we have the inherent ability to do something but are unable to do it without God's help. Either we are naturally able to do it because it's part of how we were created or we need God's grace to be able to do it, which would make it NOT inherent to us.
So God, the Almighty Creator who, by His power, created man to be exactly what he is, created man to be with Him but many don't end up with Him. In what way does that glorify God?
On the contrary, it speaks of a Creator that created man for a specific purpose, to be with Him, but that purpose will never be realized.
You don't think saying "yes" pleases God??!!
LOL!!! ROTFLOL!!! I hate to break the news to you but look at the time of my last edit: 10:38 AM. Look at the time of your post: 11:13 AM.
Now check the spelling of "coherent" in my post. In case you can't figure it out, that means that I corrected the misspelling 35 MINUTES BEFORE you even posted telling me about my "misspelling." If nothing else that should make you feel a bit silly.
You don't consider the actual creation of man to be God's grace towards humanity?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?