Dave Ellis
Contributor
- Dec 27, 2011
- 8,933
- 821
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
If you insist on your definition of perfection, then similarly, I can say that being incomplete in knowledge of what good and evil are is also under any definition a flaw. In other words, a world where there is no possibility of corruption or no knowledge of the difference between good and evil is also a flawed world.
You're conflating a flawed world with a flawed design.
If the design was intended to keep us ignorant of good and evil, and we stayed ignorant of good and evil, then the design would be working perfectly as intended.
If the intent was to keep us ignorant of good and evil, and we gained knowledge of it, then there was a flaw in the design. It did not work as intended.
When god created things, he must have had some sort of plan in mind as you always need a plan in place when designing something. If this world is what he intended, then his design was perfect. If this world is not what was intended, there was a flaw, it's inescapable.
What makes something perfect is its knowledge of both good and evil, but the will to choose good instead of evil. This is what defines God's nature, and what He desires His created beings to be like. Inability of corruption robs His creation of the complete knowledge He has of good and evil.
Knowledge of good and evil is not a requirement for perfection.
Upvote
0