• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

Jerry N.

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2024
656
234
Brzostek
✟39,448.00
Country
Poland
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
God certainly promises to take care of us, but not everybody has the courage and faith to wait on His relief. Matthew 24:20 seems to illustrate this problem.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,379
5,505
USA
✟701,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
God certainly promises to take care of us, but not everybody has the courage and faith to wait on His relief. Matthew 24:20 seems to illustrate this problem.
Actually, this proves the opposite. This is about the destruction of Jerusalem. God gave the sign when to flee from Jerusalem and Judah when they were surrounded by the Roman empire. Everyone who knew the sign were Sabbath-keepers why Jesus said He prays the flight not be in winter or the Sabbath. Mat 24:20 Everyone who fled was saved. Those who disobeyed and went after the Roman empire when they retreated and stayed, when the Roman Empire came back, they either died or were held captive. Since Mat 24 is a prophetic book this has a dual prophecy for the end of time as well.

Moral of the story, obey God over self or following traditions of man which Jesus said that path ends up in a ditch. Mat 15:3-14 But we are given free will.
 
Upvote 0

Jerry N.

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2024
656
234
Brzostek
✟39,448.00
Country
Poland
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
My history might be rusty or incorrect, but it seems that Romans spent some time searching and killing or enslaving Jews that fled the siege of Jerusalem.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,379
5,505
USA
✟701,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
My history might be rusty or incorrect, but it seems that Romans spent some time searching and killing or enslaving Jews that fled the siege of Jerusalem.
Not the first time, when the Romans surrounded Jerusalem which was the sign Jesus said to flee, they all lived. You if read the story they surrounded the city the first time (which was the sign to leave) but the Romans retreated when the Jews, who did not keep the sign and came after them. It wasn't until the second time when they came back, the Romans overthrew the city just as Jesus predicted.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,715.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why’d you begin with verse 19? Is it because you wanted to avoid the two verses before that, that support my position? The two verses where Jesus is actually talking about the law and not just the 10 commandments?

““Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭5‬:‭17‬-‭18‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

All 6 of the laws He mentioned are considered commandments by the Jews and all other Christian denominations except for one. So when He said “these commandments” He didn’t stop at two He mentioned 6 of them, three of which are NOT in the 10 commandments. There’s a reason that the Torah is also called the 613 commandments. You're cherry picking the bits and pieces of the message that appear to support your theology while ignoring the rest of the message that refutes it.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,379
5,505
USA
✟701,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Verse 19 gives the context to verse 17-18 which explains by Jesus in clear words and clear examples, the law He is referring to.

I don’t think there’s a point in discussing the same thing again. I’m ok with leaving it as agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jerry N.

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2024
656
234
Brzostek
✟39,448.00
Country
Poland
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I’m still a bit confused here. Gal. 2:21: “I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.” We should certainly keep the law, but it is impossible. We are saved by grace. However, it should be out of the love of God to do his will, but not to gain righteousness. We are “under construction” so to speak. It is evident that “none of us are righteous,” but we strive to do right for the love of God. Has anyone not broken one of the six commandments mentioned? Under grace, our spirit (or heart) leads us to obey God. That process should be supported with love and understanding.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,379
5,505
USA
✟701,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
What law was Paul referring to? Not the Sabbath, that wasn't mentioned in the whole book. The Jews were compelling Christians converts to be circumcised in order to be saved Acts 15:1 and hear the gospel. The main law Paul is referring to throughout the book of Galatians.
Basically the Jews were teaching they could save themselves by getting circumcised, but no we can't save ourselves, we are saved only by the blood of Jesus through faith.

Gal 2:2 And I went up [a]by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. 3 Yet not even Titus who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised.

The Ten Commandments can't even save us. because we all have sinned, we need Jesus. All the law does is point out our sin Rom 7:7 Rom 3:20 and so we are not depending on our righteousness but on Gods Psa 119:172 and shows as a sinner our need of Jesus when we sin, we go to Him when we are sorry and ask for His forgiveness and for a change of heart. He is so faithful to forgive us when we confess, but when He heals He says go and sin no more. Our salvation is from sin, we are not saved in our sins Heb 10:26-30, we need a conversion in Christ, trusting Him at His Word that what He asks is for our best interest, even if it doesn't always make sense to us.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

guevaraj

an oil seller in the story of the ten virgins
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2019
2,383
188
54
South Bend, IN
Visit site
✟700,842.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
This tells me that God has not told everyone about the seven day week, or the seventh day being special
Brother, God has been telling us all along to anyone who would listen. He told it to Adam and Eve in the Genesis story, which God verified to Israel in the Manna story. God compares us to Israel after Jesus, on how important the truth of God’s rest is through Paul in the book of Hebrews, as evidence of God’s existence. Proof of God's existence that we need to strengthen our faith, or we will “fall” like Israel because of our disobedience, as stated in the following passage. Replacements of God's truth have enslaved us to sin and have kept many from entering God’s rest because of our disobedience. In modern times, I hear how proud many are to disobey God’s truth as a sign of freedom to sin, when the truth of God’s rest gives us evidence of His existence. Instead, we maintain human traditions that replace Saturday with Sunday, removing the evidence of God's existence through the International Date Line, showing God's presence with us from the beginning and God's control over His word in how consistent it is in God telling us the days of the week by inspiration, even when the humans He has used to write His word misinterpret the days of the week since Joshua.

God’s promise of entering his rest still stands, so we ought to tremble with fear that some of you might fail to experience it. For this good news—that God has prepared this rest—has been announced to us just as it was to them. But it did them no good because they didn’t share the faith of those who listened to God. For only we who believe can enter his rest. As for the others, God said, “In my anger I took an oath: ‘They will never enter my place of rest,’” even though this rest has been ready since he made the world. We know it is ready because of the place in the Scriptures where it mentions the seventh day: “On the seventh day God rested from all his work.” But in the other passage God said, “They will never enter my place of rest.” So God’s rest is there for people to enter, but those who first heard this good news failed to enter because they disobeyed God. So God set another time for entering his rest, and that time is today. God announced this through David much later in the words already quoted: “Today when you hear his voice, don’t harden your hearts.” Now if Joshua had succeeded in giving them this rest, God would not have spoken about another day of rest still to come. So there is a special rest still waiting for the people of God. For all who have entered into God’s rest have rested from their labors, just as God did after creating the world. So let us do our best to enter that rest. But if we disobey God, as the people of Israel did, we will fall. (Hebrews 4:1-11 NLT)​

United in our hope for the soon return of Jesus, Jorge
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,297
2,554
55
Northeast
✟238,343.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Brother, God has been telling us all along to anyone who would listen.
I think, then, that we would see people all around the world throughout history being aware of the seventh day

I can't find evidence of this. Can you?

But we do see people who don't have the law being aware of what the law commands. People throughout history have generally known not to murder, lie, cheat... But I can't find evidence of them knowing about the seventh day


Peace be with you, my brother!

 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,952
2,043
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟554,778.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How would I render?
Translating those words Every day is not the issue. The word holy being used in their translation is. It is not there.
They misconstrued the Context by doing that.

Where does the context of the passage start?
 
Upvote 0

Jerry N.

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2024
656
234
Brzostek
✟39,448.00
Country
Poland
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Paul was referring to all or most of the commandments, not just circumcision, but circumcision was one of the primary topics since he mentions Titus. I’m not confused about salvation through the sacrifice of Christ. I’m confused about the thread of “Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath.” Are we writing about which day the Sabbath is? Are we writing about gentiles keeping the Sabbath? Are we writing about Christians being required to keep the Ten Commandments of the Torah?

Exodus 20:1-2 - And God spoke all these words: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.” This is clearly directed to the Hebrew people. However, God freed us from the bondage of sin, and we do well to take in the following commandments as our own since it pleases God and is good for us. However, the laws of God are now written in our hearts. One can read Galatians 3:21-25 to indicate that we are free of the old law by faith in the work of Christ. I do my best to keep the Sabbath, but it is not to be righteous, but it does help me to not become more unrighteous by “resetting” my devotion to God at least once a week, but I am no longer a slave to the law since it is by choice and not obligation. If we compel Christians to keep the Sabbath, are we leading them back into slavery under the law?
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,952
2,043
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟554,778.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Verse 19 gives the context to verse 17-18 which explains by Jesus in clear words and clear examples, the law He is referring to.

I don’t think there’s a point in discussing the same thing again.
That is because you are wrong.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,952
2,043
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟554,778.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If we are still sinning we are not free from the Law. We are still being tutored and are not living by the faith of Christ. For the Law is for the sinner.
 
Upvote 0

Jerry N.

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2024
656
234
Brzostek
✟39,448.00
Country
Poland
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
If we are still sinning we are not free from the Law. We are still being tutored and are not living by the faith of Christ. For the Law is for the sinner.
If we don’t commit adultery because we love our wife and God, then the law against adultery does not affect our choices out of fear of condemnation.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,379
5,505
USA
✟701,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
That is because you are wrong.
I'm going to have to side with Wesley on this subject

This 'handwriting of ordinances' our Lord did blot out, take away, and nail to His cross. (Colossians 2: 14.) But the moral law contained in the Ten Commandments, and enforced by the prophets, He did not take away.... The moral law stands on an entirely different foundation from the ceremonial or ritual law. ...Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind and in all ages.
—JOHN WESLEY, Sermons on Several Occasions, 2-Vol. Edition, Vol. I, pages 221, 222.

The book of the law or law of Moses you seem to indicate as being equal as the Ten Commandments is not demonstrated in scripture.

Deut 31:24 So it was, when Moses had completed writing the words of this law in a book, when they were finished, 25 that Moses commanded the Levites, who bore the ark of the covenant of the Lord, saying: 26 “Take this Book of the Law, and put it beside the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there as a witness against you; 27 for I know your rebellion and your stiff neck. If today, while I am yet alive

The creation doing is not the same as God doing

Exo 32:16 Now the tablets were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God engraved on the tablets.
Deut 4: 13 So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments; and He wrote them on two tablets of stone.

Exo 34:28 So he was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.


The moral law stands on an entirely different foundation. Its not to say we are not to keep some of the laws of Moses, some ended as shown Heb 10, Col 2:14KJV, Eph 2:15 Heb 9:10 but its not to be elevated over God's work. Why Mat 5:18 does not correspond to the book of the law, because a jot and tittle was changed, but God promised the words of the covenant would not be altered Psa 89:34which is the Ten Commandments Exo 34:28 a stand alone unit written by the finger of God Exo 31:18 as if man could ever edit what God personally wrote, There was a distinction between the two for a reason and the perfect law of the Lord covers so much more as Jesus demonstrated in Mat 5:17-30
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,297
2,554
55
Northeast
✟238,343.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How would I render?
Translating those words Every day is not the issue.
The word holy being used in their translation is.
Only about a quarter of the translations use the word holy in Romans 14:5

It is not there.
They misconstrued the Context by doing that.
Where does the context of the passage start?
It looks to me like it starts at 14:1

How does it look to you?

 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,952
2,043
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟554,778.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Only about a quarter of the translations use the word holy in Romans 14:5
Then they are not translating they are paraphrasing. They are saying what they think rather then what is there. Basically a commentary really.
It looks to me like it starts at 14:1

How does it look to you?
Right. And what does it say?
 
Upvote 0