False witness, yet again!
Earlier, you claimed that "the
Lord Buddha ... placed contagious people outside of the city walls".
Now, you've changed your story to say that the "
prince ... had governance of his region ..."
I stated that the "
Lord Buddha" was not in any position to order people outside of any walls - something which you claimed. Note my precise use of the term "Lord Buddha", and not "prince Siddhatta" - the
Lord Buddha held no temporal powers over his former realm. When he was
previously "
Prince Siddhatha" he may have had such powers, but the Lord Buddha no longer did.
Prince Siddhatha was not fully enlightened as a samma-sambuddhassa. The Lord Buddha was.
I tend to be
very precise in my use of words.