disciple Clint
Well-Known Member
- Mar 26, 2018
- 15,259
- 5,997
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
attacking the messenger does nothing, presenting alternative facts to rebut the facts presented is required if you disagree with the article. So it matters what you change?? Making a change of any kind is not in itself dishonest, but then consider who made the changes, that explains everything.How so? You need something a lot stronger than a biased and unreliable source to support your claim.
How did leaving off a failed legal explanation change the meaning of the quote?
Upvote
0