Newtheran
Well-Known Member
- Sep 10, 2018
- 783
- 571
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
One can argue that the RCC doesn't fall in the same trap because it's a worldwide organisation, with a bigger conservative population. The liberal attitude of a good part of their Western European and North American clergy makes me think they wouldn't be any different if they were geographically limited like the Protestants are.
What about the less traditional Protestants though, like the Baptists and the Pentecostals? Why aren't they affected by liberalism like the Lutherans or the Anglicans?
Well first, I don't know that given the current state of the RCC that I'd say that it isn't affected by liberalism. The current pope is for all intents and purposes a Marxist, supported by a cabal of homosexual cardinals and archbishops, and the lay Catholic is completely powerless to rid him or herself of this situation given the structure of that organization.
As far as Baptists, I'd say that it's incorrect to say that they aren't affected. Independent baptists aren't, but the largest Baptist denomination - the SBC - passed resolutions in the last convention supporting liberal talking points.
In Lutheranism, the ELCA for all intents and purposes has fallen out of the realm of historic Christianity while the LCMS and WELS persist in the faith.
Orthodoxy is thus far the least affected, but perhaps that's because it has the smallest presence in western culture.
This is really a human nature issue.
Upvote
0