- Apr 6, 2018
- 7,393
- 5,278
- 26
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
I can't deny that.Because for almost 2000 years there have been "Judaizers."
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I can't deny that.Because for almost 2000 years there have been "Judaizers."
This question is based mainly by comparing it with Hebrew.
Even though Greek was the main language used in the Christian world in the age of the Apostles and the Early Church, the language of the New Testament, and the Septuagint, a lot of people still use Hebrew. I don't see anyone calling Jesus "Iesous" like they call him Yeshua, even those guys say it is evil to say it in that language
I don't see anyone calling God "Theos" or "Kyrios" neither.
So, I am curious why that preference of Hebrew, which wasn't even spoken as a native language but Arameic
Because for almost 2000 years there have been "Judaizers."
Koine Greek was like the Greeks special gift to the world, it was the language of the Mediterranean world and the language of the New Testament. Aramaic was a kind of international language, a bit more common then traditional Hebrew so first century Jews had a tendency to prefer it, I think mostly from convenience. Koine Greek has been a pool of ample semantics for the church down through the ages since Christ, we name a lot of theologies and their subdivisions based on it. Declension and conjugating the Greek is a laborious task sometimes, it makes sense that it would be clumsy for modern readers to take to it easily. But rest assured the church hasn't abandoned Koine Greek, we just keep it in the context of the original language.This question is based mainly by comparing it with Hebrew.
Even though Greek was the main language used in the Christian world in the age of the Apostles and the Early Church, the language of the New Testament, and the Septuagint, a lot of people still use Hebrew. I don't see anyone calling Jesus "Iesous" like they call him Yeshua, even those guys say it is evil to say it in that language
I don't see anyone calling God "Theos" or "Kyrios" neither.
So, I am curious why that preference of Hebrew, which wasn't even spoken as a native language but Arameic
I've heard it said like this: language is like water, the closer to the source, the purer and more beneficial it is...so, Hebrew is a "mountain top" language and Greek, well, it's a little downstream.
I've also heard that language is subject to entropy and, contrary to what some believe, does not evolve.
It's because Evangelical Christians in the USA and some other English speaking lands like to pretend that the modern state called Israel is connected to bible prophecies and the people in Israel have adopted modern Hebrew as one of their national languages. I't likely connected to Christian Zionism.This question is based mainly by comparing it with Hebrew.
Even though Greek was the main language used in the Christian world in the age of the Apostles and the Early Church, the language of the New Testament, and the Septuagint, a lot of people still use Hebrew. I don't see anyone calling Jesus "Iesous" like they call him Yeshua, even those guys say it is evil to say it in that language
I don't see anyone calling God "Theos" or "Kyrios" neither.
So, I am curious why that preference of Hebrew, which wasn't even spoken as a native language but Arameic
Hebrew is also a pure language...
I feel it can be useful to learn to read Greek...
Languages do evolve. Or do you still speak English like this?
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
Oft Scyld Scefing sceaþena þreatum,
monegum mægþum, meodosetla ofteah,
egsode eorlas. Syððan ærest wearð
feasceaft funden, he þæs frofre gebad,
weox under wolcnum, weorðmyndum þah,
oðþæt him æghwylc þara ymbsittendra
ofer hronrade hyran scolde,
gomban gyldan. þæt wæs god cyning!
No more pure than any other language.
Oh hmm pretty sure I said that already.Since the New Testament is a Greek document, yes.
It's the opening of Beowulf.By "evolve", I meant communicate truth more effectively by changing. I can't understand what you typed in blue...so...I would say that today's English is a devolution of the original.
It's the opening of Beowulf.
Yep. God's name is written in it's purest form in Hebrew for a reason.Nonsense...
Oh hmm pretty sure I said that already.
It's an interesting question, especially the part about the Holy Name. I have run into a few people who call Jesus Yeshua, even though we aren't 100% sure what his Hebrew, or possibly Aramaic, name was. I sometimes use the term Adonai instead of saying the tetragramaton, but I feel like that's different.
And would you say it is a purer English than today?
Biblical Hebrew has a tiny vocabulary and would be wholly unsuitable for use as a modern spoken language. It is not pure. It is not better than Greek. It is not more holy. And it is not the language spoken by Adam and Eve. Those are all imaginary things that people have attributed to Hebrew for no good reason. And it certainly is not the language spoken in heaven.Nonsense...
No. It's a different English to today. In some ways Modern English is simpler, in some ways it's more complex. Languages change over time and there is no such thing as a "pure" language.And would you say it is a purer English than today?