Why is evolution taught in our schools?

[YeshuaFan]

I thought that the topic was evolution. What you are doing now is moving the goal posts. I will gladly discuss abiogenesis with you once you admit that evolution is a fact.

And no, I have never observed a man resurrected from the dead and there are no reliable accounts of that ever happening. Why did you even bring that up? Are you trying to disprove your own faith?

The reason that evolution is included in high school curricula is because it is based upon reliable repeatable evidence. Until creationists come up with the same it cannot be taught in schools.

Evolution has no answer to the origins of life, has no transistional evidence, has no way to account for any species change, as nature itself cannot add the additional Dna required for that to happen, and most of all, the Bible declares God was the Creator!

 

[YeshuaFan]

I wasn’t promoting the Big Bang theory, just saying it addresses the origins of the universe. I don’t think it matters because you are referring to the Bible in a discussion on science, and saying you have a PHD in creation... which is pretty silly.

Where did the Universe come out from, if there was nothing before the Big Bang per that theory?

 

[YeshuaFan]

A story which agrees in every way with every discovery of mankind, like the one written in Genesis, changes from faith to fact in the last days of this earth. Daniel 12:4

Interesting that essentially all cultures have the concept of a worldwide flood that came about die to the "gods" being mad with mankind, and only a small family unit survived that event!

 

[xianghua]

We can detect HUMAN design, yes.

Are you claiming that the Intelligent Designer of Life was a human?

we can detect design. period. it doesnt matter who design what.

 

[YeshuaFan]

The ToE, is not a scientific fact and it's false assumptions cannot be repeated. It's most obvious failure is in teaching the lie that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. Adam was made billions of years before LUCA appeared in the water of planet Earth, from where Apes evolved billions of years LATER.

That means that it is IMPOSSIBLE that Humans (descendants of Adam) could have descended from creatures made some 10 Billion years later or 3.8 Billion years ago. Science has mistakenly classified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans (descendants of Adam). The first Humans suddenly appeared only 11k years ago, in the mountains of Ararat exactly as God told us and the empirical evidence is still there. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE That's God's Truth which no man can refute.

Adam was the first human being to have the "made in image of God" applied towards Him!

 

[xianghua]

What is the evidence for creation?

Please keep in mind that nitpicking evolution is not evidence FOR creation.

do you agree that a robot that is identical to a penguin is evidence for design?

 

[YeshuaFan]

do you agree that a robot that is identical to a penguin is evidence for design?

I would agree that the reson apes and men are alike quite a bit is not due to us sharing a common ancestor, but that God blueprint for primates was pretty close and standard!

 

[xianghua]

Your replicating cars analogy has been thoroughly discredited by numerous forum members. It is a silly idea.
1. Self replicating cars do not exist.
2. Self replicating cars have not been adequately described by you.
3. Self replicating cars, as described by you, are irrelevant to discussions of evolution and design.
4. Self replicating cars are evidence that you are confused beyond my ability to help you. They are not evidence for anything else.

Now answer my question.

i asked a simple question and its seems that you refuse to answer. i think that its because the answer is clear...

 

[YeshuaFan]

i asked a simple question and its seems that you refuse to answer. i think that its because the answer is clear...

I am not following your question!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Evolution has no answer to the origins of life, has no transistional evidence, has no way to account for any species change, as nature itself cannot add the additional Dna required for that to happen, and most of all, the Bible declares God was the Creator!

That is because the origin of life is a different but related subject. It is not supposed to have an explanation.

And you are simply wrong when you claim there are no transitional forms. This tells us that you have no understanding of what a transitional form is. I can provide links that explain this to you, but I would like to see your definition first.

And the Bible has many errors in it. It is not a reliable source for this sort of claim. You might as well say "because my Mommy told me". When it comes to evolution many Christians realize that a literal reading of Genesis is simply a misuse of the Bible at best.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I would agree that the reson apes and men are alike quite a bit is not due to us sharing a common ancestor, but that God blueprint for primates was pretty close and standard!

Your statement is like saying "I would agree that dogs and German Shepherds are alike quite a bit". Humans are apes. Just as German Shepherds are dogs.

 

[AV1611VET]

German Shepherds are dogs.

Only on paper.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Only on paper.

In every sense. It appears that reality frightens you. Otherwise why the post that is rather trolling?

 

[Sparagmos]

Where did the Universe come out from, if there was nothing before the Big Bang per that theory?

I have no idea! I am an agnostic when it comes to the topic of origins. We don’t know how things “began.” I certainly don’t think the god of the Torah magically created the universe out of nothing, any more than Zeus did.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Interesting that essentially all cultures have the concept of a worldwide flood that came about die to the "gods" being mad with mankind, and only a small family unit survived that event!

No, they don't. There are many cultures that do not have the belief of a catastrophic flood. In fact it is absent in Egypt, right next to Israel. Also the flood stories disagree with each other. They in effect refute each other in that sense.

When it comes to the flood the evidence against it tells us that it never happened. And there is no evidence for it.

 

[Aman777]

One more time, do you care for a discussion on the basics of science?

No, because I don't believe your ever changing "so called" evolutionary foolishness. Would you care for a discussion on God's unchangeable Science?

 

[YeshuaFan]

Your statement is like saying "I would agree that dogs and German Shepherds are alike quite a bit". Humans are apes. Just as German Shepherds are dogs.

Humnans are made in the very Image of God, and NO other creature can claim that truth!

 

[YeshuaFan]

No, they don't. There are many cultures that do not have the belief of a catastrophic flood. In fact it is absent in Egypt, right next to Israel. Also the flood stories disagree with each other. They in effect refute each other in that sense.

When it comes to the flood the evidence against it tells us that it never happened. And there is no evidence for it.

The entire fossil record shows that it happened!

 

[Aman777]

What features and behaviours did these 'Humans' exhibit that would distinguish them from Homo Sapiens Sapiens of the preceeding ~40,000 years?

Since both were identical physically, when Adam was changed into the likeness of sinful flesh when he sinned, it was more intellectual. Adam was made by Jesus with a mind like God's on the 3rd Day. Genesis 3:22 Every other living creature was created and brought forth from Water on the 5th Day Genesis 1:21 by God the Trinity. These "natural creatures" were made without the superior intelligence of God, which leaves them innocent.

When Adam disobeyed, he lost his Shekinah Glory or brightness, which surrounded him and he looked just like the sons of God (prehistoric people) Adam was identical to the people who had descended from the common ancestor of Apes. This is WHY Science has continued to falsely classify prehistoric people as Humans (descendants of Adam) when they were NOT Humans, UNTIL they married and produced children who inherited Adam's superior intelligence in a body with the DNA of prehistoric people inside.

IOW, Today's Humans are a combination of the sons of God and Adam's descendants. Soon, this scientific Fact will be discovered, which means that we can dismiss the ToE as the biggest satanic lie ever forced upon our children. Amen?

 

[Aman777]

It doesn't. Not even by a long shot.

Correction: YOUR interpretation does not agree with Scripture. That's what I've been telling everyone for many years now. Your view is that of an ancient religious scholar who lived thousands of years before Science.

Yet somehow, the entire scientific community seems to have missed that.
It's them you would need to convince. Which shouldn't be a problem if you actually can. But you can't, can you?

Of course not since they have been brainwashed to believe the satanic lie of the ToE since they began to be indoctrinated in the 1st Grade. Most of them have faith in the ToE because they have never questioned it. The satanic censors of the lie attack anyone who refuses to bow to their willing ignorance, and insist that anyone working in Science, must worship at the Altar of Evolution. Amen?