Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
so you cant deal with my claims. thanks for this clarification.
no, since evolution has no such limit. a 500my rabbit will not be a probelm.But the beginning of your adulthood does have a limit....just like evolution.
i actually didnt talked about tiktaalik but about this finding:So now you are admitting your error.
but you said that according to evolution its impossible to find a 200 my bear fossil. so i showed that there is no such a limit.If your claim actually made any sense, I would deal with it.
What you are asking is nonsensical. So don't blame me when an answer isn't possible.
And? Are you trying to make a point?i actually didnt talked about tiktaalik but about this finding:
Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland
but you said that according to evolution its impossible to find a 200 my bear fossil. so i showed that there is no such a limit.
the point is that this fossil contradict the creature phylogeny and therefore is evidence against evolution according to your criteria. its like a human fossil that predate great apes.And? Are you trying to make a point?
No, it didn't. Why would you think that it did? This is simply a strange claim on your part.the point is that this fossil contradict the creature phylogeny and therefore is evidence against evolution according to your criteria. its like a human fossil that predate great apes.
no, since evolution has no such limit. a 500my rabbit will not be a probelm.
You didn't show any such thing. You asserted it, without any evidence or support. To show "there is no such limit" you'd actually have to show something. You keep claiming to have evidence of a 200my bear, but you never produce that evidence. Any reasonable person would conclude that you're talking nonsense and have nothing more than hot air. So, please either produce your evidence or admit that you have none.but you said that according to evolution its impossible to find a 200 my bear fossil. so i showed that there is no such a limit.
but you said that according to evolution its impossible to find a 200 my bear fossil. so i showed that there is no such a limit.
why? because its a more modern creature that appeared too early. its like finding first human at the fossil record and then great apes.No, it didn't. Why would you think that it did? This is simply a strange claim on your part.
A bunny being found before bunnies existed
Of course it has that same limit
You didn't show any such thing. You asserted it, without any evidence or support.
but we both agree that we can push bear evolution. right? so the question is where is the limit. i say that there is no such a limit. you say that there is such a limit. so where is your limit? so far you gave no specific answer. so your claim that such a limit exist has no evidence.You never showed any such thing, and you've only ever presented imaginary things as evidence against evolution.
But it did not appear "too early". Again, why did you make this error?why? because its a more modern creature that appeared too early. its like finding first human at the fossil record and then great apes.
Then you do not understand what you are arguing against.but we both agree that we can push bear evolution. right? so the question is where is the limit. i say that there is no such a limit. you say that there is such a limit. so where is your limit? so far you gave no specific answer. so your claim that such a limit exist has no evidence.
Evolution is wrong, whether I'm right or not.Then you do not understand what you are arguing against.
Evolution has been shown to be correct countless times. We could begin to go over the evidence for it, but that would take lifetimes. Meanwhile creationists cannot seem to find any reliable evidence against the concept. You may as well proclaim gravity to be wrong.Evolution is wrong, whether I'm right or not.
but in this case this rabbit fossil will just push back rabbit evolution. again: by this logic evolution is already false since tetrapods were supposed to evolve about 360 my ago. so finding a 395 my old fossil of tetrapod should falsify evolution too.
so where is the limit? by pushing it 20 my earlier? 30my?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?