Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My heart's not in it though.As do you.
Example?an out of place fossil.
by ignoring out of place fossils any fossil will be in the correct place.Quite a few from someone like yourself who can't explain why in-place fossils are where they are.
you said that if a creature has a similar morphology it will have a similar genome too. right? but as we seen- its not always true.Of course I want to deal with facts. It's why I'm no longer a YEC, after all.
i will do it when you will answer my simple question about your prediction. again: if i will show you a case of 12354 instead of 12345 you will admit that evolution is false or not? why its so hard for you to answer?@xianghua are you going to post your out of place fossil evidence anytime soon?
what?A watch looks like it was designed, compared to what looks _______. (fill in the blank)
Many have grown their mind to exclude Spiritual Higher Life and only accept what comes from nature and natural processes.I have made my position clear already.
Now post your evidence.
Honestly, it seems like you are trying to get me to agree that any irregularity will result in me abandoning my opinion that evolution is a powerful explanatory tool. I'm not going to do that. If your evidence is valid evidence against evolution, then I promise I will consider it.
Now will you PLEASE stop blustering about it and POST IT.
Some learn that there knowledge-base is superior to select others.Coming from creationists, that means little.
Anti-science scientists. Hummmmmm.I watched a video about the fallacy ....................... The anti-science crowd has trouble with the distinction.
Which is exactly what creation "scientists" do. They take the position that nothing they can discover or conclude will contradict a literal reading of the Genesis creation stories no matter what the evidence is. Group-think.The issue is if they line up to the group-think crowd's points of view, from minor to possibly what is viewed as major ways of using and concluding aspects in life.
The Bible and the Holy Spirit enlighting verses in the Bible within people produces Christians. People who have attained God's intention in His present Creation. Kids. Kids of God. Give Christians a "group-think" title if you want. I do not mind.Which is exactly what creation "scientists" do. They take the position that nothing they can discover or conclude will contradict a literal reading of the Genesis creation stories no matter what the evidence is. Group-think.
So those enlightened by the Holy Spirit realize the literal historicity of the Genesis creation stories and the rest of us are Godless?The Bible and the Holy Spirit enlighting verses in the Bible within people produces Christians. People who have attained God's intention in His present Creation. Kids. Kids of God. Give Christians a "group-think" title if you want. I do not mind.
There are many group-think groups existing in the world.
Naturalists/godless scientists is a group which has no need for a god to explain the natural realm and processes around them.
Christians and godless scientists have major differences, possibly the foremost is: a) the godless has no need for a god to explain things; verses b) Christians have the Bible and Holy Spirit enlightenment of Scriptures from the Bible, meaning they have encountered input from God in their days, weeks, and months during this life.
To Christians, God uses the Bible in their life, even input from above enlightenment of verses in the Bible. God teaches and guides them by Divine input and enlightenment of Scriptures.
To Christians the Bible becomes reality via God's input from above. To the godless the Bible is an ancient book written by men.
Through Holy Spirit input Christians learn the God of the Bible Created the physical realm, and with great purpose.
The godless do not see a Creator Being that produced this physical realm. For reasons still to be determined it just happened and exists. No divine being needed. No divine being discernable by their intellect.
Creationists is a bit of a spectrum of ideas of how and when the physical realm was Created. But Genesis at face value shows it was produced in 6 Days. Some read alot into Genesis 1:1-3, and state as the godless scientists that the physical realm is billions of years old, by radiometric dating and thought of how long galaxies and solar systems would take to physically develop in time.
So Creationists are most related to a young Earth and physical realm. With a Creator central to its age, design, and purpose.
I grew up and was academically educated as a godless geologist. The Bible was a book produced by men containing ancient myths and man created stories of supernatural events.
But I am a Creationist now, though still fully educated in natural sciences and know what the godless scientists know about the Earth.
The differentiation stated above is the reason why I no longer see this Earth as billions of years old. It is because of input from His Holy Spirit, that include decades of the Holy Spirit enlightening select Scriptures. I have tasted Power from Above, and see the physical realm as limiting people to be only naturalistic and Earthly.
i will do it when you will answer my simple question about your prediction. again: if i will show you a case of 12354 instead of 12345 you will admit that evolution is false or not? why its so hard for you to answer?
Many have grown their mind to exclude Spiritual Higher Life and only accept what comes from nature and natural processes.
These types of people are godless: living without God in this world.
The godless have raised their voice over the past 200 years, setting aside input from God, setting aside what possibly is because of God, and try to explain everything through natural processes. Natural sciences have harbored godless people.
This is how I grew up, as a godless geologist.
I have found trying to live godless still required faith. Some hardliners try to exclude their faith as a godless person, but the faith is still present.
Conjecture-based conclusions is one of prominent excerise use of faith.
As most, anything that seems to challenge their godless mindset and beliefs they may often lash out with disapproval and counter facts or statements of correction.
Being without God in this world is a fantasy. Try as they may the godless have serious ignorance that others have found Him and His input before them.
So, how is it out of place? What does it come before that it couldn't have? All this article is saying, is that we've learnt something new that we didn't know before. and Now we know. You know this is how science works, right?see in my first comment.
And anti-science people that embellish thier supposed educational brackground to try to impress people, then fail miserably by running away every time science is discussed.Anti-science scientists.
No, having an academically acquired science degree and occupation as a scientist is a scientist.
Projection noted.The issue is if they line up to the group-think crowd's points of view, from minor to possibly what is viewed as major ways of using and concluding aspects in life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?