- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,269
- 52,668
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Evidently so did Gautama.You and I have different definitions of "mother" or "parent".
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evidently so did Gautama.You and I have different definitions of "mother" or "parent".
You really need to read a post before responding to it.So it what? just materialized out of thin air?
With billions of people all over the world and a long history of man, that is a lot to ignore, because most of it was not first hand to you.No, I am saying that I have no reason to believe anything is definitively real without first-hand knowledge of the subject.
Dad,With billions of people all over the world and a long history of man, that is a lot to ignore, because most of it was not first hand to you.
I wouldn't say I ignore it all ... I'd say that anything I do not know personally, I take with a grain of salt - especially when there are multiple sides claiming to teach the "truth" about a subject.With billions of people all over the world and a long history of man, that is a lot to ignore, because most of it was not first hand to you.
There are issues of belief, and there are issues of reality that is beyond reasonable doubt. If I read some news, like refugees are fleeing from many countries, I see no reason to doubt it. If I hear someone tell me it is just because of this or that reason, I take that with a grain of salt. I don't have to be in Croatia or Hungary of Greece to know a lot of refugees exist.I wouldn't say I ignore it all ... I'd say that anything I do not know personally, I take with a grain of salt - especially when there are multiple sides claiming to teach the "truth" about a subject.
Wouldn't you agree that what the majority believes doesn't make them inherently right ... as even your Scriptures proclaim (Matthew 7:14)?
There are no eyewitness accounts.
There are only stories that are intentionally written to sound like first hand accounts when, in fact they are either:
Stories passed on from person to person
-or-
Totally fabricated stories
Neither is convincing.
I do not take that issue you just described as "beyond reasonable doubt". I've investigated the "other side of the story" and highly suspect that these "refugees" are in reality an enemy invasion force consisting of mostly young men. (Look at the vast majority of the alleged photos of these refugees - where are their elderly parents, younger women, children?)There are issues of belief, and there are issues of reality that is beyond reasonable doubt. If I read some news, like refugees are fleeing from many countries, I see no reason to doubt it. If I hear someone tell me it is just because of this or that reason, I take that with a grain of salt. I don't have to be in Croatia or Hungary of Greece to know a lot of refugees exist.
I'll bet Ted Bundy would have loved having Buddhists in the jury box.I wouldn't say I ignore it all ... I'd say that anything I do not know personally, I take with a grain of salt - especially when there are multiple sides claiming to teach the "truth" about a subject.
I wouldn't say I ignore it all ... I'd say that anything I do not know personally, I take with a grain of salt - especially when there are multiple sides claiming to teach the "truth" about a subject.
I'll bet Ted Bundy would have loved having Buddhists in the jury box.
A grain of salt?Do you not distinguish between "certainty of truth from personal direct knowledge" and "faith in what may likely have happened after hearing and weighing second-hand information from all sources"?
I possess no personal, first-hand evidence regarding alleged spacecraft and satellites or of these "thousands and thousands of people". Retrograde motion is predictable whether the model is heliocentric or geocentric. Get real.
ecco said:There are no eyewitness accounts.
There are only stories that are intentionally written to sound like first hand accounts when, in fact they are either:
Stories passed on from person to person
-or-
Totally fabricated stories
Neither is convincing.
So all these people were martyred for nothing ... right?<snip>Watered by the blood of her martyrs.
Whatever they are, they are real people. The earth really rotates.I do not take that issue you just described as "beyond reasonable doubt". I've investigated the "other side of the story" and highly suspect that these "refugees" are in reality an enemy invasion force consisting of mostly young men. (Look at the vast majority of the alleged photos of these refugees - where are their elderly parents, younger women, children?)
Same with the alleged story of a "rotating earth" or a "heliocentric system" or with many other subjects. There are multiple ways of interpreting data, and I can't and won't say that I'm 100% certain of my position, but I may lean towards one position based on what I may have heard from others after weighing multiple sides to a story.
I can only be certain of what I know firsthand, personally.
Your scriptures also speaks of testing all things (obviously for yourself), does it not (1Thes 5:21)?
You want to go by what the bible says now?Now that's just crazy talk!
Does it say in the Bible that it rotates?![]()
Name a belief or two, and I will reconcile.I'm just curious how you reconcile your beliefs with your Scriptures.
Right, science tells us that. I see nothing contrary in the bible, so what is to reconcile?"The earth really rotates" you stated.