• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why do Christians have trouble with accepting Evolution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You asked which of the two accounts was true. That indicates that you thought one was not true.
I don't recall asking that. In one post I did ask which was correct, but I didn't say which is true because I don't believe either is true. They are, in my opinion, allegories. If I used the term true please show me exactly where, becasue it was used in error.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟98,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, this Christian believes in evolution but will certainly not be going to the grave without hope.
In the space provided, please list all the passages in the Bible that agree with evolution. _ Write legibly.
 
Upvote 0

Extraneous

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2016
4,885
1,410
51
USA
✟34,796.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I don't recall asking that. In one post I did ask which was correct, but I didn't say which is true because I don't believe either is true. They are, in my opinion, allegories. If I used the term true please show me exactly where, becasue it was used in error.

I dont know, just forget it, it doesnt matter.
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Thats not accurate. There are 800 million Protestants and 1.2 Billion Catholics. That doesn't count Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans and others. Protestants are not far behind Catholics in numbers. Add others to Protestants and you might even be outnumbered
I still see a 400 million discrepancy, even with double-counts...Anglicans are Protestant...FYI. Now back to the topic?
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
In the space provided, please list all the passages in the Bible that agree with evolution. _ Write legibly.
Are you saying that one cannot be a Christian and believe in evolution?
 
Upvote 0

Extraneous

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2016
4,885
1,410
51
USA
✟34,796.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I still see a 400 million discrepancy, even with double-counts...Anglicans are Protestant...FYI. Now back to the topic?

OK add Anglicans and that's another 85 million on our side, not counting others not mentioned. Yes lets get back on topic, your errors are off topic. :)
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟98,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yet chapter 1 said that animals were created before man, chapter 2 say animals were created after amn.
Not true.
Remember, chapter two starts with the statement that the creation was complete.
It was intended for Eve to be Adam's helper from the beginning. The animals were brought to Adam to name, but none of them were suitable. So God fashioned Eve from Adam's rib and created for him the helper that He had intended from the beginning. Chapter two references many of the events which were described in chapter one, such as that the animals had been formed already but that Eve had not. There is no mention of how much time elapsed between the creation of Adam and the creation of Eve.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟98,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you saying that one cannot be a Christian and believe in evolution?
I'm asking for you to present Scriptural support for your position.
I can readily point to the many references to Adam being formed from the dust of the earth.
Can you mention as many that say he evolved from simpler life forms over millions of years? If those verses exist, I've never seen them. Perhaps you have.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟98,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes there is. Chapter 1 animals then man, chapter 2 Adam then animals then Eve.
Chapter 2 does not contradict anything in chapter 1. It gives greater detail into why man was created, but the only creation in chapter 2 was Eve.
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
OK add Anglicans and that's another 85 million on our side, not counting others not mentioned. Yes lets get back on topic, your errors are off topic. :)
No error here...most Christians are Catholic. 400 million Protestants includes Anglicans! And possibly Orthodox...not sure about Orthodox, though.
 
Upvote 0

Extraneous

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2016
4,885
1,410
51
USA
✟34,796.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No error here...most Christians are Catholic. 400 million Protestants includes Anglicans! And possibly Orthodox...not sure about Orthodox, though.

That's 800 million, plus Anglicans and others. Its probably over a billion.
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
That's 800 million, plus Anglicans and others. Its probably over a billion.
Probably nothing. Anglicans are Protestants, by the same Pew Survey:
webready-graphic-43.png
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
85
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟250,214.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
I think i know some key ideas. Its because it undermines the creation story and that people will become irreligious?

Well wouldnt that be an issue about the idea of the earth is flat if the bible is literal on that part i mean?

What i mean is that science explains our physicial world. The main point i am making is that Creation Story had two interpretations in medieval ages. Allegory" basically a deeper meaning than it is. Or "Literally" like just like it is written.

So basically allegory seems to be the key point then. Since that can be used. Since God is outside our understanding. Science is a method just to understand the world we live in more or less.

So i dont see the problem with evolution, because it doesnt undermine the scripture in the sense of it not being true?

Although i do believe its a shame that more people who lack understanding go away because of ignorance and just dont bother trying to understand why Christianity is a religion to help your life.

But i am curious to what you think?

Just one link should suffice to explain :

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/10/introducing_the_1099951.html

It is not a religious issue. It is the 'science' of putative Evolution that is utterly, utterly flawed and inadequate. Indeed, it is arguable, that if ever God had needed our admiration, had Evolution been true, it would have appeared to redound all the more to God's credit. 'Appear' being the operative word, mind you. God needs our praise and admiration like a fish needs a bicycle.

In Christian scripture, notably the Psalms, the praise of God is a very common theme, but rather than seeing it as a fawning sychophancy towards a narcissistic God, it should be viewed as the way in which we may best express our love for God ; and since we shall, d.v., eventually be fully incorporated into the living God, himself, in the Mystical Body of Christ, the True Vine, what goes round will come round in a very nice way. One great love-in/love fest !
 
Upvote 0

Extraneous

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2016
4,885
1,410
51
USA
✟34,796.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Probably nothing. Anglicans are Protestants, by the same Pew Survey:
webready-graphic-43.png


Either way, your original assertion was in error.

Here are the numbers:

The Catholic Church has 1.1 billion adherents worldwide, representing half of the global Christian population.

The world’s 801 million Protestants, as broadly defined in this report (see Defining Christian Traditions), make up 37% of the global Christian population.

There are about 260 million Orthodox Christians, making up 12% of the global Christian population.

There are about 28 million Christians in the world who do not belong to the three largest Christian traditions. Those belonging to other Christian groups make up slightly more than 1% of the global Christian population.

http://www.pewforum.org/2011/12/19/global-christianity-traditions/
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
85
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟250,214.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
I think i know some key ideas. Its because it undermines the creation story and that people will become irreligious?

Well wouldnt that be an issue about the idea of the earth is flat if the bible is literal on that part i mean?

What i mean is that science explains our physicial world. The main point i am making is that Creation Story had two interpretations in medieval ages. Allegory" basically a deeper meaning than it is. Or "Literally" like just like it is written.

So basically allegory seems to be the key point then. Since that can be used. Since God is outside our understanding. Science is a method just to understand the world we live in more or less.

So I don't see the problem with evolution, because it does not undermine the scripture in the sense of it not being true?

Although i do believe its a shame that more people who lack understanding go away because of ignorance and just dont bother trying to understand why Christianity is a religion to help your life.

But i am curious to what you think?

-------------------------------------------------
Your theory concerning our putative fear of science undermining the creation story is unfounded. As I pointed out earlier, the science is simply not there - even historical science. Here is what Arno Penzias, co-discoverer of the background radiation from the Big Bang (itself originally postulated by Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian Catholic priest) :

'The best data we have [concerning the Big Bang] are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the bible as a whole.' - Arno Penzias

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/06/would_dr_arno_penzias_nobel_la003733.html

Also, worth noting at the link, below, is the fact that the most prestigious scientific journal, Nature, found in a survey that 40 % of physicists, biologists and mathematicians believe in God - not an impersonal god, but a personal God who listens to the prayers of each one of us, and so on.

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/quotes.html
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,909
3,645
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟399,065.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Either way, your original assertion was in error.

Here are the numbers:

The Catholic Church has 1.1 billion adherents worldwide, representing half of the global Christian population.

The world’s 801 million Protestants, as broadly defined in this report (see Defining Christian Traditions), make up 37% of the global Christian population.

There are about 260 million Orthodox Christians, making up 12% of the global Christian population.

There are about 28 million Christians in the world who do not belong to the three largest Christian traditions. Those belonging to other Christian groups make up slightly more than 1% of the global Christian population.

http://www.pewforum.org/2011/12/19/global-christianity-traditions/
It's actually about 1.27 Billion Catholics. Even so, we are most Christians, unless you lump everyone else together. So then, Catholics vs youse guys maybe you're right, but we're still 50%. That's what half is, after all.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.