Like i said you can not tell me what I implied it is subjective. so me where give me the number i'll look, I think you are mistaken
I've already done this for you in post 435.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Like i said you can not tell me what I implied it is subjective. so me where give me the number i'll look, I think you are mistaken
Like I said if you take issue with it it is Gods word take it up with him.
and round and round we go, hey maybe I can just stop post and others can post for me sense they know better than me what I am saying.
God I have no issue with. It is you who is interpretting His word in such a way to imply that evolutionists do not serve Him.
I never said they did not serve God. i said what is wrong with evolution this and quoted. The rest is subjective.
Or maybe, just maybe, you've realised the foolishness of suggesting that people who believe evolution are the people spoke of in Romans Chapter 16, that a hyperliteral reading of the word YOM produces contradictions concerning the day of Adam's "death", and that you haven't adequately defined death in order for evolution to contradict that definition.
The problem is that the verse is about people, not doctrines.
oh wait a min first you said it was speaking of the doctrine of Gnosticism are you now changing your story?
God I have no issue with. It is you who is interpretting His word in such a way to imply that evolutionists do not serve Him.
Gnosticism fits better as part of what is "contrary to what you first received" than evolution does. But the verses are speaking against the teachers of falsehood rather than the falsehood itself.
Your issue is with God if your issue is with me. If God is for me and I am preaching His word than who else would it be with.
But you don't like it when I just quote the Bible, because if you attack Gods word others would have something to say and then you would be attacking God, so You try to get me to comment give you something to attack that is not God. Hoping I mess up or make a mistake and step out of His light. Am I getting close is that what you are doing?
so you agree it is about both false doctrines and people?
"Just posting a verse" proves nothing - Scripture must be interpreted. The word "evolution" is no where to be seen. The context is not about theories of creation nor about science. The original context appears to be about judging one another about the celebration of the sabbath, or feast days, or the eating of meat. Nothing to do with how God created.
Do you see that the verses quoted are about PEOPLE, not teachings?
17 And now I make one more appeal, my dear brothers and sisters. Watch out for people who cause divisions and upset peoples faith by teaching things contrary to what you have been taught. Stay away from them. 18 Such people are not serving Christ our Lord; they are serving their own personal interests. By smooth talk and glowing words they deceive innocent people. 19 But everyone knows that you are obedient to the Lord. This makes me very happy. I want you to be wise in doing right and to stay innocent of any wrong. 20 The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. May the grace of our Lord Jesus[g] be with you.
These people are put in contrast with the body of the church - those people who are obedient to the Lord.
This is the interpretation of the scripture - it is about teachers of falsehood who are not i the body, not serving God.
No - the verses are about PEOPLE - people who teach contrary to what you've been taught.
The cautions are about these people, not the teachings. The commentary is about the heart of these people, not about the heart of the teaching. The entire set of verses is about "avoid such PEOPLE" and contrasting those people against the people obedient to God.
After all this agression and suggestion that I am against God if I am against you (ha!) I STILL don't have a clear definition of death that occurred the day of the fall.
I don't know what aggression you speak of I'm at perfect peace, how bout you?