Stephen Hawking astrophysicist*
Correct, you did not understand the analogy.
"No support whatsoever."
Speaking as if one is all knowing is not a very scientific mentality.
I had two excerpts that showed the change in his stance over time, incidentally. Let me see if I can find it.
No, if you make a claim about someone else the burden of proof is upon you to support it. If you do not support that claim then there is "No support whatsoever". Instead of wasting time you should have supported your claim.
But again, why go to Stephen Hawking about evolution? He was not a biologist.
Upvote
0