Archaeopteryx
Wanderer
Actually, most of that stuff was dealt with in the New Testament. Jesus not only healed on the Sabbath, He also harvested and warmed corn to eat. He told us that "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.
As it happens, I do prefer all cotton for most of my clothes, and I happen to agree with God that carrion eaters should not be a part of a healthy diet. Besides, the taste of shellfish is nauseating to me.
That isn't necessary, when we have God's rules.
Which seem to vary from church to church and Christian to Christian.
You mean like stoning a woman taken in adultery?
Oh, wait. Jesus handled that, too.
Since I can't claim that I am without sin, I am excused from attending any stoning parties...
I mean like stoning disobedient children. He handle that one? Amazing that the supposedly inerrant word of God required Jesus to step in and start clarifying what it really meant. If he was God's Son, one wonders why he didn't enlighten the people earlier, thereby saving many from falling victim to stoning - a form of punishment that he (as the Father) put in place to begin with.
I don't mind the holding hands, or even the mild kiss. And some of the comedy is hilarious. I thought Robin Williams was a scream in The Birdcage. Although I would not let my little ones watch it. Buttocks hanging out...
It's gay pride parades, it is those kiddie movies, it is running around in clothes a three dollar hooker wouldn't be seen in...that kind of disgusting nonsense in public that upset people.
If you guys weren't so obnoxious about it, most serious objections would probably melt away.
You seem to think that the responsibility for not being hated somehow falls on homosexuals. No, the onus is on you.
I am bound to put God's law before man's law. You should know that.
I don't care. When a child dies because her parents refused to seek medical assistance, believing that God would heal her if they prayed feverishly enough, we don't accept the following as a good excuse for their actions: "We are bound to put God's law before man's law."
You are being treated like any other gay customer who wants me to bake a cake for a gay wedding. I will be happy to direct any of them to a baker that will:
a. do the job willingly
b. do a better job for you than I would
c. would not overcharge you
You are not treating them like every other customer in a business ostensibly operating to members of the public. You are discriminating against certain segments of the public while invoking your religion as an excuse. That is against the law.
The only reason you would not accept that is to cause trouble and get headlines.
I promise to smile when they come to take my picture for the news...
It's amazing how you are reversing this... You're the one causing trouble and yet somehow other people are to blame.
I wouldn't expect anything different. However, upon being told that I have a religious objection, the best thing to do would be to go to a place that will serve you without violating their conscience.
Force is force. Raping my soul is just as cruel as raping my body. Just as rape really isn't about sex, so is this situation not really about cake. What it is really all about in both cases is POWER... You want me to be helpless to resist you...
Presumably no one is forcing you to become a baker. Presumably no one is forcing you to operate a business to members of the general public. In doing so you recognise that there are laws governing how such businesses operate and you are required to abide by them. If you don't want to, then don't become a baker and don't open a business to the public. The law doesn't force you to become a baker or to operate your business to the public. So spare us your tripe about how your poor soul was forced - raped even - by being required to obey laws you find inconvenient. You at least got one thing right: it's not about cake; it's about equal treatment - something you seem to think gay people have no right to expect.
Last edited:
Upvote
0