• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why are so many Christians against annihilation in hell when scripture supports it?

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Reactions: ClementofA
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
From your link.
Of a Different Kind
Plato's own idea of what has been translated as "the Eternal" is not so much metaphysical as focused on difference in kind. The focus was "not subject to decline," "undiminishable," not subject to time," or in modern terms, "not subject to entropy."
William Barclay, in his excellent essay on this word aionios, comments on all the connotations of the various usage of aionios and specifically about Plato's use:
"But it was Plato who took this word aionios – he may even have coined it – and gave it its special mysterious meaning. To put it briefly, for Plato aionios is the word of eternity in contrast with time. Plato uses it, as it has been said, 'to denote that which has neither beginning nor end, and that is subject to neither change nor decay, that which is above time, but of which time is a moving image'.
"Plato does not mean by this word simply indefinite continuance – this is a point to which we must later return – but that which is above and beyond time."
He proceeds to cite three instances of this different focus. These are all good additional illustrations of why it is incorrect to translate the Greek word aionios as "eternal" or "everlasting."
Barclay concludes, among other details and insights:
"Simply to take the word aionios, when it refers to blessings and punishment, to mean lasting far ever is to oversimplify, and indeed to misunderstand, the word altogether. It means far more than that."
But then Dr. Jenkins contradicts himself and says this.
Integrity of the Text
Let me just restate: No word in any one language “MEANS” any other word in some other language. Each word or phrase in any language bears its own integrity, which arises out of its place in the cultural worldview of the people whose language that is!
Many scholars believe that Plato coined the adjective "aionios" because it first occurs in his writings. But let us ignore all other scholars, Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich, Danker, Robertson because one guy tells us us "No word in any one language “MEANS” any other word in some other language." Okay let's take that to its logical conclusion. So there is nobody on this forum who can tell us what any Greek word means in English. Thank you mr. Linen for bringing this to our attention.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Dear D.A.: Clement and mr. linen will do anything to get you to sing one note of the Anthem the angels are singing>>>>>glad tidings of great joy which is to ALL people.

I AM A CONVINCED UNIVERSALIST, by William Barclay

God is the Source, the Guide & the Goal of the all
 
Reactions: ClementofA
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FineLinen said:
Dear D.A.: Clement and mr. linen will do anything to get you to sing one note of the Anthem the angels are singing>>>>>glad tidings of great joy which is to ALL people....
I note how you completely ignored my post and the humongous contradiction in your quote from Dr. Jenkins.As long as UR "sources" are self contradictory I will never sing the UR hymn, "Glad tidings of great joy to all mankind righteous and unrighteous alike."
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."

Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."

1 Cor.15:22 AS in Adam ALL die SO ALSO in Christ shall ALL be made alive.

1 Cor.15:28 And when ALL shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put ALL under him, that God may be all in ALL.

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

*************************************************

"You are fully, completely, and thoroughly adored by God."

"Relationship with God is the most important thing."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I've looked into that a few times and there is a Biblical argument that can be made for the utter destruction of the body and soul in the lake of fire. It actually makes sense that the suffering won't be eternal because, what would be the point? Jesus even said:

Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell Matthew 10:28.
When I encountered the argument originally I had never thought about it, but listening to the arguments it started to make sense.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

The author of BDAG provides no argument, proof or explanation why he classified aionios in Matthew 25:46 under "a period of unending duration, without end". His first definition of aionios is "pert. to a long period of time". Why didn't he classify aionios in Matthew 25:46 under that definition? He doesn't say.

If early church universalists agreed with BDAG re Matthew 25:46 would they have been universalists? Evidently they do not agree with BDAG re aionios in Matthew 25:46. Unlike the author of BDAG, many of them were native born Koine Greek speakers in a Koine Greek speaking society. Some were also Koine Greek scholars. Yet BDAG's author thinks he knows better than them who were within a few hundreds years of Christ's death?

Furthermore, why does BDAG ignore their writings as well as all of the following examples of how aionios was used in ancient Koine Greek:

Two Questions

What were the theological biases of the author of BDAG? Did his biases influence him to leave out all of those uses of aionios? Or was he ignorant of them? Was he influenced to follow blindly the conclusions of his predecessors? Or to follow the opinions that would lead to selling more copies of his book? What - spirit - was controlling this man?

Why did the author of BDAG also reject the conclusions of many other modern scholars such as Moulton & Milligan who state: "In general, the word depicts that of which the horizon is not in view, whether the horizon be at an infinite distance...or whether it lies no farther than the span of a Cæsar’s life." Strong's #166 - αἰώνιος - Old & New Testament Greek Lexicon

Augustine's ignorance & error re Matthew 25:46

Have you been decieved by your Bible translation?

Is aionion necessarily coequal in duration with aionion (in Mt.25:46)?
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom


Dear DA: The "great joy which shall be to ALL people is NOT a "UR hymn" and applies to every last broken wreck of Adam1. But be of good cheer, the broken wrecks, each & every one, are destined to meet with the Last Adam, the Lord Jesus Christ with His "all the more" reconciliation.

Adam 1= the polus "made sinners"

The Last Adam= the polus "made righteous"
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom
"Glad tidings of GREAT joy which shall be to ALL people">>>>

"..so abundant was God's grace,the grace which He, the possessor of all wisdom and understanding, lavished upon us, when He made known to us the secret of His will. And this is in harmony with God's merciful purpose for the government of the world when the times are ripe for it—the purpose which He has cherished in His own mind of restoring the whole creation to find its one Head in Christ; yes, things in Heaven and things on earth, to find their one Head in Him. In Him we also have been made heirs, having been chosen beforehand in accordance with the intention of Him whose might carries out in everything the design of His own will, so that we should be devoted to the extolling of His glorious attributes.."
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FineLinen said:
<FL>
Dear DA: The "great joy which shall be to ALL people is NOT a "UR hymn" and applies to every last broken wreck of Adam1. But be of good cheer, the broken wrecks, each & every one, are destined to meet with the Last Adam, the Lord Jesus Christ with His "all the more" reconciliation.
Adam 1= the polus "made sinners"
The Last Adam= the polus "made righteous"<end>
There seems to a marked disregard for context in the quotations. Here is the out-of-context proof text.
1 Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
Note, this verse does not say "All die and all shall be made alive." There is a condition, "in Adam" and "in Christ."
.....All mankind are "in Adam" because all mankind are physical descendants of Adam. But all mankind are not "in Christ." In order to be made alive a person must be "in Christ." Note, how Paul uses the phrase "in Christ."

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
The converse of this vs. is there is condemnation for those not in Christ.
Romans 12:5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
The converse of this vs. is those not "in Christ" are not part of one body and not members one of another.
1 Corinthians 1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours:
The converse of this vs. is those not "in Christ" are not called to be saints.
1 Corinthians 15:19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
The converse of this vs. those not "in Christ" have no hope in Christ and are miserable.
2 Corinthians 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.
The converse of this verse is those not "in Christ" are blinded, their eyes remain veiled
2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.
The converse of this verse is those not in Christ are not new creatures, the old things for them have not passed away.
Galatians 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
The converse of this vs. is those not "in Christ" are not children of God.
Galatians 6:15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
The converse of this vs. is those not in "in Christ" are not new creatures.
Ephesians 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
The converse of this vs. is those not in "in Christ" are far off and not made nigh by the blood of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
82
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟551,042.00
Faith
Non-Denom

Dear DA: Not quite! The "out of context proof text" is Romans chapter 5. Would you like me to place the entire out of context proof text before us? What translation would you like?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And then we have the verses where Paul unequivocally says that many groups of people will not inherit the kingdom of heaven.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
(9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
(10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Galatians 5:19-21
(19) Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
(20) Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
(21) Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Ephesians 5:5
(5) For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
And I cannot find a verse anywhere in the writings of Paul where he says something like, "Don't worry although I say none of you can inherit the kingdom of heaven after death God will save everyone righteous, unrighteous, murderers, idolators, harlot mongers, everybody."
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
No they are not! What did the Corinthians, Galatians and Ephesians understand when Paul said all those groups would not inherit the kingdom of God? There is no record that
they were ever told anything different.

How does this relate to the fact that 1 Cor.6:9-11 does not refute universalism?

Do you think 1 Cor.6:9-11 refutes universalism? How?



It's right in front of your eyes, if you read the next verse after those you quoted:

1 Cor 6:9-11

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

"And SUCH WERE SOME OF YOU: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."

As a commentator says:

"Wait a minute. If the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God, why does Paul say "and such were some of you?" If they were unrighteous, then how did they inherit the kingdom?"

"They had to be cleansed first, of course. As long as anyone is not cleansed, they have no part inside. But once cleansed, they they entered the kingdom."

So the passages you quoted are perfectly harmonious with universal salvation.

Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."

Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."

1 Cor.15:22 AS in Adam ALL die SO ALSO in Christ shall ALL be made alive.

1 Cor.15:28 And when ALL shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put ALL under him, that God may be all in ALL.

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.
 
Reactions: FineLinen
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,199
Vancouver
✟332,633.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

Paul didn't say "all in Christ shall be made alive". He said "in Christ shall all be made alive". Who are the "all" of the parallel statement in the first half of the parallel:

1 Cor.15:22 For as in Adam ALL die, even so in Christ shall ALL be made alive.

How many human beings does the "all" in "in Adam all" die refer to? All mankind.


1 Cor.15:25 For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.

How many will be "under His feet"? Just enemies or all:

1 Cor.15:27 For “He has put in subjection all under His feet.” But when it may be said that all has been put in subjection, it is evident that the One having put in subjection all to Him is excepted.

So there is only one exception to "all" to be "put...under his feet". Then God will be "in" "all", hence universal salvation:

1 Cor.15:28 And when all shall be subjected unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all under him, that God may be all in all.
 
Reactions: FineLinen
Upvote 0