• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where is the record of God creating Homosexuals in the Creation Account?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One Messiah, actually, you didn't answer the question in the OP,
which is "
Where is the record of God creating Homosexuals in the Creation Account?".
You may have replied, but your reply did not answer the question,
nor could it by nature of your profession of being an atheist.
What you did do, was formulated your own question and
answered it accordingly. But surely you did not answer the
question posed in the OP.

FYI, David Brider has been on my ignore list for about 8-9 months,
so don't expect a response from me in particular, to his posts, and further I am
reasonably assured by experience, that he did not offer a Biblical response anyway.

Again as a proclaimed Atheist (does not believe in God OR Creation) it is logical
for you not to participate in this thread and it would be respectful of you as well.
All you can do is attempt to promote homosexuality, but you are unable to answer
the question by default of your position. So, I would appreciate you utilizing a little
integrity here in this regard. We have PM'd, (you and I, and had some decent conversation)
and I believe you should have at least that much respect in light of that, given the topic okay?

Thanks in advance.
Uhmmm not being gay or an atheist what about my post, #58? :scratch:
tulc(just curious) :)
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
MOD HAT POST

This thread is treading on thin ice for all the bickering and personal insults contained within so I would recommend redirecting the discussion back to the topic at hand.

Additionally, I would also mention that dualistic gnosticism is heretical and I have a strong inclination to just ship this thread off to Unorthodox Theology for the implication that there is more than one creator God.

From the Nicene Creed:

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible....

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Crazy Liz
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The complete record of the creation of mankind, along with
God's direction for them as well as for succeeding generations is contained in the OP.
(remember Adam and Eve had no earthly parents, so the direction for a man to leave his
mother and father and be joined to his wife is specifically for the successive generations,
which was also reiterated by the Lord in the New Testament).

As well, so also is the record of the creation of ALL living things
contained in the verses shared in the OP.

Thus "every fowl of the air, every beast of the field and every creeping
thing that creeps on the earth."


The subsequent fall of man, which had a negative affect on ALL living things on the earth,
bringing forth death and corruption did not however change or have any affect at all on
God's intents or purposes for His creation. Thus Christ's purpose for coming. To redeem all
who will be redeemed and who will take part in living eternally in the Lord's presence as
it was originally for Adam and Eve before the fall.

The rest of your post consists of strawmen and red herring.


Where is the record of God creating plenty of things? In fact by all intents and purposes we should establish how Adam and Eve looked and shun and hate everyone who dosent look, sound and behave exactly like them, because you know, they were the original designs for how humans should be, right?

I mean some people here seem to love persecuting already so why not just widen the playing field to include most people? It'll be fun!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am the OP as you know.
Can you please point to the posts and/or statements where
you believe that I have posted any such dualistic gnosticism?

If you cannot, then you cannot legitimately ship my thread off to
unorthodox theology because of any other participants posts.
You may however, legitimately edit or delete such posts.



MOD HAT POST

This thread is treading on thin ice for all the bickering and personal insults contained within so I would recommend redirecting the discussion back to the topic at hand.

Additionally, I would also mention that dualistic gnosticism is heretical and I have a strong inclination to just ship this thread off to Unorthodox Theology for the implication that there is more than one creator God.

From the Nicene Creed:



 
Upvote 0

OllieFranz

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
5,328
351
✟31,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Bump!

Why has no one answered my response quoting 2 Tim 4:4? The Creation accounts in Genesis are parables. They have important teachings imbedded in them, but they are neither scientific nor historical accounts. To treat them as actual history is to turn them into myth and fable.

Also, everyone is trying to treat this as a brilliant debate tactic. When someone on this side of the aisle uses the exact same tactic, in claiming that the Gospels do not record Jesus as ever having condemned homosexuality, they are rightfully shot down. Arguing from silence is always a weak tactic.

IAR, in her response to so many others ("I put you on ignore, but I'm told that your reply didn't say anything of substance anyway.") has somehow missed my response
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am the OP as you know.
Can you please point to the posts and/or statements where
you believe that I have posted any such dualistic gnosticism?


If you are arguing that God did not create homosexuals, most people would have to wonder who created or made them, then.

Gnosticism, more specifically within Christianity the systems formulated by Valentius which was somewhat monistic (it's been a while since I've read a bit on it though), generally argues that our sinful nature and the material world was the creation of an imperfect God or demiurge which created the sinful aspects of the world.

There is a lot of variation within those systems and some, I believe, would have God (the real God not the demiurge) creating the virtues and goods of the world and the demiurge being responsible for the aspects of the world that are marred by sin.

Regardless, the Nicene Creed affirms that God the Father almighty is creator of heaven and earth and ALL THINGS visible and invisible which, of course, includes gay people.

To argue against that is unorthodox and we have other forums where that discussion could take place....
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tulc
Upvote 0

HaloHope

Senior Member
May 25, 2007
506
165
✟17,438.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
If you are arguing that God did not create homosexuals, most people would have to wonder who created or made them, then.

Gnosticism, more specifically within Christianity the systems formulated by Valentius which was somewhat monistic (it's been a while since I've read a bit on it though), generally argues that our sinful nature and the material world was the creation of an imperfect God or demiurge which created the sinful aspects of the world.

There is a lot of variation within those systems and some, I believe, would have God (the real God not the demiurge) creating the virtues and goods of the world and the demiurge being responsible for the aspects of the world that are marred by sin.

Regardless, the Nicene Creed affirms that God the Father almighty is creator of heaven and earth and ALL THINGS visible and invisible which, of course, includes gay people.

To argue against that is unorthodox and we have other forums where that discussion could take place....

This is the greatest post on this thread by far.
 
Upvote 0
O

onemessiah

Guest
One Messiah, actually, you didn't answer the question in the OP,
which is "
Where is the record of God creating Homosexuals in the Creation Account?".
You may have replied, but your reply did not answer the question,
nor could it by nature of your profession of being an atheist.
What you did do, was formulated your own question and
answered it accordingly. But surely you did not answer the
question posed in the OP.

FYI, David Brider has been on my ignore list for about 8-9 months,
so don't expect a response from me in particular, to his posts, and further I am
reasonably assured by experience, that he did not offer a Biblical response anyway.

Again as a proclaimed Atheist (does not believe in God OR Creation) it is logical
for you not to participate in this thread and it would be respectful of you as well.
All you can do is attempt to promote homosexuality, but you are unable to answer
the question by default of your position. So, I would appreciate you utilizing a little
integrity here in this regard. We have PM'd, (you and I, and had some decent conversation)
and I believe you should have at least that much respect in light of that, given the topic okay?

Thanks in advance.


First, allow me to rephrase my response.
It is implied that god created homosexuals, because god created all humans, according to the bible.
So, then, I believe that makes god a prankster, since you used that very reference to validate your own opinion.

Secondly, why does my religious status void my opinion? A legitimate question is a legitimate question, regardless of the source.
If you are confident that the bible can hold up to scrutiny, then you should be embracing the opportunity to showcase that in order to evangelize, as your bible directs you to.

I will save you from judgement against breaking the command to witness by continuing to challenge assertions made on behalf of god.

Just looking out for you! ;)
 
Upvote 0

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2003
17,090
1,106
California
✟23,305.00
Faith
Christian
So, I will post it yet again, and perhaps this time we can move away from the childish derailments, ad hominems, non sequiturs, red herrings, strawmen ad nauseum and actually answer the question.
Remember, all of the living creations that God said was good, especially mankind, (made in His image) and instructed to be fruitful and multiply was also BEFORE the fall of mankind.


So, again, I ask you....


Where is the record of God creating Homosexuals in the Creation Account?

Are homosexuals human beings?

If so, the account of their creation by God is right here:

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Is that a simple enough answer?
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Did I "say that to so many others"?
Or did I "say that to one other person?"

While there are several in this forum who have made
it to that list eventually having no desire to hear
and obey the Word of God, or perhaps I've found only participate
to derail, stir a pot or otherwise post non-conducive responses etc.,
the fact is, I only made ONE post to that effect. So, you have
born a false testimony.

I will make it a point to search for your post, which may have
been lost in all of the nonsense, but I can tell you that my
expectations of anything more than non-sequitur, strawmen
red herring and ad hominem, based on experience with your
posts are not very high.



Bump!



IAR, in her response to so many others ("I put you on ignore, but I'm told that your reply didn't say anything of substance anyway.") has somehow missed my response
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have presented no such argument. I presented Scripture/exegesis
(none of which is gnostic) and presented a question, which up to this point
has remained unanswered.

You seem to have an awful lot of experience recently assigning things to me,
based on your personal assumptions, because you apparently have developed a
bad habit of "reading into" things much further than you ought.

I did not ask you for an education on gnosticism. I asked you to direct me to
my posts/statements that qualify your accusation.

And please. You allowed supporters of the doctrine of Universalism to start a
thread in the CP&E which should have been put in the Unorthodox section,
but was not. So please don't attempt to present a pious stance about this, especially
since I have NOT presented a gnostic argument and you have FAILED to show that I have.





If you are arguing that God did not create homosexuals, most people would have to wonder who created or made them, then.

Gnosticism, more specifically within Christianity the systems formulated by Valentius which was somewhat monistic (it's been a while since I've read a bit on it though), generally argues that our sinful nature and the material world was the creation of an imperfect God or demiurge which created the sinful aspects of the world.

There is a lot of variation within those systems and some, I believe, would have God (the real God not the demiurge) creating the virtues and goods of the world and the demiurge being responsible for the aspects of the world that are marred by sin.

Regardless, the Nicene Creed affirms that God the Father almighty is creator of heaven and earth and ALL THINGS visible and invisible which, of course, includes gay people.

To argue against that is unorthodox and we have other forums where that discussion could take place....
 
Upvote 0
O

onemessiah

Guest
Did I "say that to so many others"?
Or did I "say that to one other person?"

While there are several in this forum who have made
it to that list eventually having no desire to hear
and obey the Word of God, or perhaps I've found only participate
to derail, stir a pot or otherwise post non-conducive responses etc.,
the fact is, I only made ONE post to that effect. So, you have
born a false testimony.

I will make it a point to search for your post, which may have
been lost in all of the nonsense, but I can tell you that my
expectations of anything more than non-sequitur, strawmen
red herring and ad hominem, based on experience with your
posts are not very high.



Do you agree that post #78 above answers the OP?
 
Upvote 0

stumpjumper

Left the river, made it to the sea
Site Supporter
May 10, 2005
21,189
846
✟93,636.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I presented Scripture/exegesis
(none of which is gnostic) and presented a question, which up to this point
has remained unanswered.

Does not your question regard the creation of homosexual people?

There is only ONE orthodox answer.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
OP said:
Where is the record of God creating Homosexuals in the Creation Account?

That would be here:
Genesis1: 26-31 said:
26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground."
29 Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food." And it was so.
31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.
if gay people are humans their origin would be right there, :)
tulc(again, it seems pretty simple to me) ;)
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The fullness of that Scripture includes verse 3.
2 Timothy 4:3-4

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after
their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;

And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.


And Jesus IS God. So, those who say that Jesus "didn't say this or that"
are not being spiritually or intellectually HONEST.

John 1:1-3 &14

In the beginning was the Word, the Word was WITH GOD and the WORD WAS GOD.
The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without
him was not any thing made that was made.
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt
among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,)
full of grace and truth.


So, Jesus was there at the time of the creation of the earth and ALL living things.
So, He should know, being that He is the ALPHA and the OMEGA, the FIRST and the
LAST, the BEGINNING and the END, what the plan for mankind was and is wouldn't you say?

Jesus ministered during His earthly ministry to JEWS, not Gentiles.
The Jews already knew the Law, they had already been given it.
Jesus abided under the Law and in fact was the ONLY ONE to KEEP ALL THE LAW.
Which is what He means when He said that He did not come to abolish but to fulfill the law.
He also ushered in a time of grace, where God's mercy can be found in Christ's shed blood
by the cross, through faith and repentence.

And so it is not an argument of silence, because the audience Jesus
was speaking to already had the law, which HE GAVE to them, because He is
the LIVING Word of God. Living Word means it was spoken out of God's mouth,
it will NEVER die. His Word is LIFE to those that find it! Jesus is the Way, the
truth and the LIFE.

And He certainly did speak the same as was said regarding the union
of men and women exactly as was spoken in Genesis at the time of creation,
again in Matthew 19:4-5, Mark 10:6-8


Matthew 19:4-5"And he answered and said unto them, Have you not read, that he
which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and
shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"



Mark 10:6-8"But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And
they two shall be one flesh: so then they are no more two, but one flesh."


And so, is it also reiterated AGAIN through Paul instructing Christian
men as to how they should love their wives, In Ephesians 5:28-31.

Ephesians 5:28-31
So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies.
He that loves his wife loves himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh;
but nourishes and cherishes it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members
of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave
his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.



So, yes Ollie, 2 Timothy 4:3-4 do apply, but not to whom or to what circumstance
you have applied them.



Why has no one answered my response quoting 2 Tim 4:4? The Creation accounts in Genesis are parables. They have important teachings imbedded in them, but they are neither scientific nor historical accounts. To treat them as actual history is to turn them into myth and fable.

Also, everyone is trying to treat this as a brilliant debate tactic. When someone on this side of the aisle uses the exact same tactic, in claiming that the Gospels do not record Jesus as ever having condemned homosexuality, they are rightfully shot down. Arguing from silence is always a weak tactic.
 
Upvote 0

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2003
17,090
1,106
California
✟23,305.00
Faith
Christian
I have presented no such argument. I presented Scripture/exegesis
(none of which is gnostic) and presented a question, which up to this point
has remained unanswered.

You seem to have an awful lot of experience recently assigning things to me,
based on your personal assumptions, because you apparently have developed a
bad habit of "reading into" things much further than you ought.

I did not ask you for an education on gnosticism. I asked you to direct me to
my posts/statements that qualify your accusation.

And please. You allowed supporters of the doctrine of Universalism to start a
thread in the CP&E which should have been put in the Unorthodox section,
but was not. So please don't attempt to present a pious stance about this, especially
since I have NOT presented a gnostic argument and you have FAILED to show that I have.




:doh: It's taken a long time for me to get it. :doh:

Homosexuals are not created by God.

Homosexuals are not created by anyone other than God.

Therefore, homosexuals are uncreated.

The Creed says, "We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, ... begotten, not made..."

Does the Creed say Jesus Christ is the only uncreated being? No, it does not. So to say homosexuals are uncreated would not be unorthodox. QED.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sidhe
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.