Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can be, I do not bother to read long texts if even the beginning is something I do not agree with. Thats why I recommend you to post just one thought per post, its much more effective for all sides of a conversation.I don't think it is accurate that the entire "the rest of off [my] argumentation is built on this disputed part of the verse." (my emphasis)
Posting just one thought per post is the service you can do for others. Do not force readers to read your preachings. Also, be careful with colors and similar distractions.If you care, I think you'll bear with reading carefully what is written.
I do YOU the same service.
My response is still the same. Jesus came from heaven, went again to heaven and prepared places for us there.Your response?
Its not just for argument's sake, its already the accepted position in biblical sciences. Some copyist probably added "and who is in heaven" as a commentary to the text (because Jesus was already back in heaven) and some other copyist thought its a part of the original text.For argument's sake let's assume "the Son of Man which is in heaven" does not belong in the autograph original text of John 3:13.
Because the places prepared for us are there, thats the text. I do not know "what would that do for me to prove it", its just what the text says. He did not say "and I will come back to live with you here", He said "and I will take you there with me" (not a quotation).So what would that do for you to prove God wants man's eternal destiny to live up there in Heaven ?
How would the elimination of those five words establish your case ?
Because you can be a citizen of a country/kingdom even if you are still away and waiting for going there. Which is the context of Paul's words - they were waiting for getting there.And why didin't Paul say "our citizenship WILL BE in the heavens" if we physically are not there yet?
Okay.I am not saying you teach riddles.
I am saying God speaks prophecy in riddles.
Sorry about the misunderstanding.
Okay.However, in NT apostolic teaching authoritative to the church (Lk 10:16), there is only one rapture at the end of time, at the second coming (1 Th 4:16-17), compared to the multiple raptures derived from incorrect interpretation of prophetic riddles.
Again, very sorry for the misunderstanding.
Is there something wrong with preaching ?Do not force readers to read your preachings.
That is not a good interpretation of John 14.My response is still the same. Jesus came from heaven, went again to heaven and prepared places for us there.
The textural criticism I will explore for myself to see if I should take scissors to that verse in my NT.Its not just for argument's sake, its already the accepted position in biblical sciences. Some copyist probably added "and who is in heaven" as a commentary to the text (because Jesus was already back in heaven) and some other copyist thought its a part of the original text.
Let's say I have a problem (as a born again Christian) with alcoholism and hitting my wife.Because the places prepared for us are there, thats the text. I do not know "what would that do for me to prove it", its just what the text says. He did not say "and I will come back to live with you here", He said "and I will take you there with me" (not a quotation).
Do you have a verse proving that "they were waiting for getting there"?Because you can be a citizen of a country/kingdom even if you are still away and waiting for going there. Which is the context of Paul's words - they were waiting for getting there.
You may be harder than I am Keras.So the 'rapture to heaven' believers will never convince anyone who seriously reads their Bible. The lazy people who accept doctrines from anywhere, except the Bible, are deceived and because they choose to believe lies, the Lord has locked them into their delusions. Isaiah 29:9-12, and stopped their ears to the truth; 2 Timothy 4:4
Sure. For example:Do you have a verse proving that "they were waiting for getting there"?
Yes, its too long and unnecessary. If your first presuppositions are wrong (or at least not accepted by others), creating a monologue built upon them is a useless effort.Is there something wrong with preaching ?
Its not "either-or". And "more labor, skill or effort" does not apply to God, he is not limited by time, energy or skills.Which requires more labor, skill and effort from the Lord Jesus?
1.) Preparing my mansion in heaven?
2.) Transforming my personality to become more Christ like?
Good morning myst33.Yes, its too long and unnecessary. If your first presuppositions are wrong (or at least not accepted by others), creating a monologue built upon them is a useless effort.
Its not "either-or". And "more labor, skill or effort" does not apply to God, he is not limited by time, energy or skills.
What I would say to you I would also like Kares to read.Doesn't the bible says God will descend form heaven, with the city too and all, and he will live with us in a heavenly earth? forgive me if i'm mistaken..
I would like to say to you also -Heaven is God’s home. Earth is our home. The Lord Jesus, as the Son of God and the Son of man will eventually make Heaven and Earth as one.
Ephesians 1:10…everything in heaven and earth will be brought together under one Head; Jesus Christ.
Just as the separation between heaven and earth will be forever demolished through Jesus, so too will the separation between God and mankind be removed.
Revelation 21:3 Now: the dwelling of God is with men and He will live with them.\
Zechariah 9:10 The Lord will banish all the things of war, He will proclaim peace to the nations and His rule will extend to the ends of the earth.
God’s plan is to make all things as one, to remove the separation between the spiritual and the physical worlds. This is the ultimate plan of God and the finale of secular history. When God walked with Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, it was then a part of heaven, but when they sinned, angels with flaming swords kept mankind out and we await its re-establishment on earth. Revelation 21 to 22
And "the new earth is not a restoration or remodeling of the old earth; it is an entirely new world without a sea:
"... the first earth had passed away and the sea was no more (Revelation 21:1)."
Most of our current planet is water! It seems doubtful that this "new earth" will be a new planet orbiting around our very old sun. More likely, it will be an earthlike world in a spiritual plane and in that sense a heaven, perhaps even a newly designed portion of Paradise in the third Heaven:
"In my Father's house are many dwelling places... I go to prepare a place for you (John 14:2-3)."
The born again are with Jesus at death.The new earth in the kingdom of heaven is a spiritual realm that we enter at death, but it is already here in a spiritual dimension that we cannot see with our physical eyes:
The kingdom of God is here now (Mt 12:28, Lk 11:20), within us (Lk 17:21)."The kingdom of God does not come with signs to be observed; nor will they say, "Look, here it is!" or "There it is!" For the kingdom of God is [already] in your midst (Luke 17:20-21)."
It has entered us (Lk 17:21).Put differently, the HEAVENLY Jerusalem or kingdom of God is an already present spiritual realm that we have already entered:
Which is referring to the church of both time and eternity (Heb 12:22-23)."You have [already] come to... the city of the living God, the HEAVENLY Jerusalem and to innumerable angels in festal gathering and to the assembly of the firstborn WHO ARE ENROLLED IN HEAVEN... (Hebrews 12:22-23)"
Yes, the names of those in "the assembly and a church of the firstborn" (Heb 12:23) are written in heaven.When we are enrolled in a school, we attend that school; and when we are "enrolled in Heaven," we attend and enter Heaven.
Okay.
Okay.
Because this thread intended to be about the misunderstanding of the "going to heaven" error which
is prevalent instead of the nature of the church, I do not want to get too sidetracked into eschatology.
It seems I easily invite excursions into prophecy.
I would say what is shown in symbolism about raptures I feel comfortable can be
shown in plain teaching as well most of the time.
So back to the nature of the church verses "going to heaven".
The problem of sin remains with man this side of the grave.A few questions for you:
1.) Do you think man can solve his problems by going to another planet, like, let's say Mars? If so, why? If not so, why not?
2.) Do you think man can solve his problems being taken to another place, like, let's say Heaven? If so, why? If not, why not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?