Where gravity and forces come from..!

[driewerf]

Have any evidence for this or just more bible?

Most living things that reproduce are microscopic. Does that mean you conclude that there are absolutely no microscopic organisms as there is no mention of their creation in the bible?

Also, keep in mind, Genesis 1 has light, night and day, and plants all existing before there is even a sun. The sky merely seperates two a body of water above from the oceans, and stars are merely tiny lights he placed on the vault of the sky do we know it's night time.

And God forgot to create the atmosphere...

 

[JustMeSee]

dad has some of the funniest responses to evidence.

 

[snackster29]

Not at all, not sure where you get these strange little ideas. Not from me. Why hate a force?

You tell me? Someone say it was? What do you say?



How are the Jetsons dead? The thing is, they never really existed, gravitons are a way to try to explain gravity in a same state way.


Yes. It was BS.

With that phd right? your exceptional proficiency in mathematics?
You took your whooping that i handed to you well XD thanks to you im planning on releasing a rap album

 

[AV1611VET]

Funny, it seems to me like He never forsook His mom. His dying wish was for John to take care of her. How bad is that?

I had been waiting for the right moment to spring with that point, but you beat me to it.

Good show, old chap; I bow to the publish-or-perish principle.

 

[snackster29]

uhhhhh yo im feeling it. dont make me burn you again try me

 

[snackster29]

btw every fundamental force can easily be explained(without god) we have a basic understanding of gravities functions and currently two theories(string theory,Quantum Loop Gravity) are being worked on the most to find this ultimate answer, the actual processes being used to find a suitable solution to gravity would appear incomprehensible to anyone who does not have a very high background with mathematics.
just because you are aware of a theory doesn't mean you know anything about it

 

[dad]

Have any evidence for this or just more bible?

The proof is in the pudding. We have an inability of science to be able to evidence any same state past, hence same rate evolving. Therefore, slow evolution rates, and processes, in the far past when most evolving happened, cannot be evidenced.

Most living things that reproduce are microscopic. Does that mean you conclude that there are absolutely no microscopic organisms as there is no mention of their creation in the bible?

Man is not microscopic. Neither are the main elements mentioned in creation week. Red herring.

Also, keep in mind, Genesis 1 has light, night and day, and plants all existing before there is even a sun.

Yes...so??

The sky merely seperates two a body of water above from the oceans,

Says....who??

and stars are merely tiny lights he placed on the vault of the sky do we know it's night time.

Later in the book we also see there is an association with angels. But where does it say they are tiny?

 

[dad]

With that phd right? your exceptional proficiency in mathematics?
You took your whooping that i handed to you well XD thanks to you im planning on releasing a rap album

Oh. Ha. Was that you with the blasphemy rap on another thread? Glad you are pleased with yourself....moving on.

 

[dad]

Why would you possibly think that it is nonsense? There have been hundreds of claims throughout the years that man would never understand X because it is the realm of God. And once we did understand it, the new questions created became the realm of God.

There have been hundreds of millions of would be claims of knowing it all too. So? It still is what it is.

Now you say the fundamental forces are from God, but there was a time when those forces had not been identified and their effects were seen as acts of God.

Then who are you, who still don't know what they are to question good sense??

Beware of science of the gaping gaps.

 

[carmelsnowcone]

Ok so hypothetically science is beyond our comprehension and all that jazz and we really don't know anything.
How does that lead to the conclusion that God must have done it?

 

[dad]

It also shows that sexual reproduction is not an all or nothing proposition for a species.

False. I might show that some species don't need to do the wild thing. But it does not mean man and most beats and fish do not reproduce in a certain way.

So sexual reproduction is not (to use a intelligent design term) "irreducibly complex". As such, there is no reason to point to sexuality as proof that evolution didn't occur.

No reason to point to anything that evolving didn't occur. It does. It did. From created kinds. So? If you mean the fable of evolution from the pond, that has zero support is isn't worth thinking about.

 

[dad]

Ok so hypothetically science is beyond our comprehension and all that jazz and we really don't know anything.
How does that lead to the conclusion that God must have done it?

It is not the glaring failures of science to know that lead man to believe in a creator. We did that long before science was here to fail.

 

[dad]

So, current evolution is not evolution, but the result of sin.

False. It is evolution. From created kinds.

 

[carmelsnowcone]

What if believing in a higher power is just a pyscholgical condition in our nature? Then science is suddenly more important since it becomes revelent

 

[dad]

dad has some of the funniest responses to evidence.

Thanks. The "evidence" that is offered here demands humor.

 

[dad]

What if believing in a higher power is just a pyscholgical condition in our nature? Then science is suddenly more important since it becomes revelent

What if...science was real special, and knew stuff? You kidding??

 

[carmelsnowcone]

science-systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

Its just what we precieve as reality, we are mortal now regaurdless of wether there is an afterlife or not to completely throw it out the window would be determental.

 

[dad]

science-systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

What about it?? Give unto the systematic knowledge of the physical or material world, what is the systematic knowledge of the physical or material world's. Give unto the spiritual what is the spiritual's.

Its just what we precieve as reality,

Speak for yourself. For some of us it is only PART of reality.

we are mortal now regaurdless of wether there is an afterlife or not to completely throw it out the window would be determental.

To throw what out the window?? Just because we are temporal does not mean that we need to throw out the eternal. Neither does it mean there is any need to deny the physical also. So?

 

[Nostromo]

There's little point arguing with you dad, I don't think you even know why you believe what you do. You're so set in your ways that you mentally cannot overcome the hurdles you've created for yourself.

It defeats me how a firm belief in world-dominating lizard people would be classed as a psychotic episode, while belief in a universe-dominating spiteful/benevolent creator being outside our physical existence is actually applauded by large sections of the population.

 

[Delphiki]

Don't you see? Imagination fantasy land is every bit as real and important as the real world!