Where does the GOP stand on Contraception?

[RileyG]

Sure, disregard the consequences of “personhood at conception” because we can‘t know for certain what becomes of these poor, innocent souls.
If that’s as close as you can get to intellectual honesty, so be it.

That wasn’t my point, but ok.

 

[NxNW]

Believe what you want. I answered your question.

You did not.

I am not going to do anymore of your homework for you.

I don't have homework. I pointed out a fatal flaw in your argument-- that not all humans begin at conception-- and you've refused to address it.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

There are even lesbians, who will never have sexual intercourse with a man, who use birth control to regulate their cycle among other things.

It’s not just about preventing conception.

Yes, Some women have to use BC for medical issues. That have nothing to with preventing pregnancy.

 

[RileyG]

Yes, Some women have to use BC for medical issues. That have nothing to with preventing pregnancy.

I’m just stating BC is used for other reasons,

That’s all.

 

[wing2000]

...in related news:

Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked consideration of a bill to protect access to in vitro fertilization.....

Almost every Republican senator voted against moving forward with the Democratic-backed legislation. The measure needed 60 votes to advance and received 48.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/13/senate-in-vitro-fertilization-vote/

 

[wing2000]

"The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to limit access to a widely used abortion medication, rejecting a challenge from antiabortion doctors two years after the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. Wade.

In a unanimous ruling, the court sided with the Biden administration and the manufacturer of mifepristone and reversed a lower court decision that would have made it more difficult to obtain the drug used in more than 60 percent of U.S. abortions. The opinion was not on the substance of the case, but on a procedural ruling that the plaintiffs did not have legal grounds to bring the challenge.

Writing for the court, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said the antiabortion doctors who brought the case do not prescribe or use mifepristone, and the FDA’s relaxed regulation of the medication does not require those doctors to do or refrain from doing anything.


“Rather, the plaintiffs want FDA to make mifepristone more difficult for other doctors to prescribe and for pregnant women to obtain,” Kavanaugh wrote. Under the Constitution, he added, a group’s “desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/13/supreme-court-abortion-pill-ruling-mifepristone/

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Since I been on this Christian forum. I'm stunned that some people think it's their business about our personal private BC control. Republicans need to keep their nose out of BC needs.

 

[DaisyDay]

Nothing hormonal. Condoms are alright because they dont act as abortafacients in any sense.

Also the guy has complete control over it.

 

[Diamond72]

You did not.

o well to bad, so sad, lets have a pity party.

 

[Diamond72]

I pointed out a fatal flaw in your argument

Good for you, congratulations on a job well done.

 

[RileyG]

Since I been on this Christian forum. I'm stunned that some people think it's their business about our personal private BC control. Republicans need to keep their nose out of BC needs.

I said it before and I’ll say it again.

What happens in the bedroom (between consensual adults) stays in the bedroom.

It’s literally no one’s else’s choice or business.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Well you said “near 100%”

Homosexuality is not near 100%, it is indeed 100% chance of no conception

Not if they get medical help.Donor sperm or egg. And a woman to carry.

 

[Adam56]

Also the guy has complete control over it.

The woman doesn’t? There are rape laws.

 

[comana]

The woman doesn’t? There are rape laws.

A woman doesn’t have control over when an egg is released. A man, however, has complete control over whether or not to insert his dna.

 

[Pommer]

The woman doesn’t? There are rape laws.

Wife: “Please put on a ‘glove’”
Husband: “Not tonight, c’mon!”

You think she’s going to turn him in the next day?

 

[DaisyDay]

The woman doesn’t? There are rape laws.

That was what Julian Assange was wanted for in Sweden - for not using a condom with two different women after they agreed to have sex with a condom being used.

In America, we have no such rape laws; any man may legally take off or simply not use a condom with no legal consequences (other than being liable for child support should the act result in one, and that is for the sake of the child not the mother).

 

[DaisyDay]

Wife: “Please put on a ‘glove’”
Husband: “Not tonight, c’mon!”

You think she’s going to turn him in the next day?

Even if she tried, there would be no consequences for the husband. While sexual intercourse needs consent, condom use or disuse does not. In the same vein, women may also deceive their partners re birth control usage with no legal consequences.

 

[Diamond72]

Since I been on this Christian forum. I'm stunned that some people think it's their business about our personal private BC control. Republicans need to keep their nose out of BC needs.

This has nothing to do with Christian Forums. This has to do with the court system in this country. Also the FDA and President. So all three branches of the government are involved.

 

[Adam56]

Wife: “Please put on a ‘glove’”
Husband: “Not tonight, c’mon!”

You think she’s going to turn him in the next day?

Are u serious?

No means no. If she says no, and he goes for it, he broke the law. She reports him. She has that responsibility.

 

[Pommer]

Are u serious?

No means no. If she says no, and he goes for it, he broke the law. She reports him. She has that responsibility.

She might want to make love, but she’d prefer if her husband used a condom.
In other words she consents to sex but not to (possible) pregnancy.

Odd thing to ruin a marriage over, but she has that “responsibility”?
Uh-huh, sure.