Where are the dinosaurs?

[razeontherock]

And in every single case that has been thoroughly looked at it turned out they were either mistaken, drunk or lying.

Being drunk and being mistaken tend to go hand in hand. What about MD's who saw dinos last century?

 

[Elendur]

Your exaggerated assumption generalization ignores & bypasses the sincerity & curiosity & fear of natives, tribes, people who are cut off from the internet, from western civilization mentality, from Hollywood, from us people, from our international society.

Burden of proof. I suggest you read up on it.
http://dougwalton.ca/papers%20in%20pdf/88burden.pdf
Fallacy: Burden of Proof
Scientific method - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(That goes to you too AV)

 

[Elendur]

Being drunk and being mistaken tend to go hand in hand. What about MD's who saw dinos last century?

Those were incorrect as well, or they would've been able to provide evidence.

 

[razeontherock]

Those were incorrect as well, or they would've been able to provide evidence.

With a link, otherwise they just made it up

 

[Trogool]

Your exaggerated assumption generalization ignores & bypasses the sincerity & curiosity & fear of natives, tribes, people who are cut off from the internet, from western civilization mentality, from Hollywood, from us people, from our international society. They don't even know what dinosaurs are but they are clearly able to point at our pictures of dinosaurs. They have no reason to lie about their encounter with these larger animals, the horrifying monsters that they see, hear, smell, taste, encounter, experience, feel.

Hahahahaha you're kidding right? Not even AV pretends that dinosaurs are really still around.

 

[Elendur]

With a link, otherwise they just made it up

Nah, just any evidence other than words. Perhaps the dinosaur itself? A partially eaten carcass? Some saliva? Excrement? Skin? Teeth? Claws? Anything?

 

[NGC 6712]

Your exaggerated assumption generalization ignores & bypasses the sincerity & curiosity & fear of natives, tribes, people who are cut off from the internet, from western civilization mentality, from Hollywood, from us people, from our international society. They don't even know what dinosaurs are but they are clearly able to point at our pictures of dinosaurs. They have no reason to lie about their encounter with these larger animals, the horrifying monsters that they see, hear, smell, taste, encounter, experience, feel.

Not exaggerated - I stated what has occurred EVERY single time these claims have been investigated.

This is the 21st century not the 19th century. Just where the heck are these things hiding? Answer - nowhere, because they do not exist. There is nowhere on the planet sufficiently large and unexplored for such things to have remain hidden. There are no dark unexplored continents left. Sure - we find a new species of a dwarf deer or a small monkey now and again - not 30 ton herbivorous sauropods that wouldn't exactly be quiet and hard to find.

And never underestimate the cunning of "native" peoples to extract food/clothing etc. out of gullible investigators who so want to believe such fabrications. They have many reasons to lie.

 

[NGC 6712]

Being drunk and being mistaken tend to go hand in hand. What about MD's who saw dinos last century?

I'll go with a combo of drunk, mistaken or lying. One or all always seem to be involved.

 

[razeontherock]

Nah, just any evidence other than words. Perhaps the dinosaur itself? A partially eaten carcass? Some saliva? Excrement? Skin? Teeth? Claws? Anything?

Of course. Because a visual sighting always produces this. At least if you're an MD.

 

[Elendur]

Of course. Because a visual sighting always produces this. At least if you're an MD.

I'll recite:
Burden of proof. I suggest you read up on it.
http://dougwalton.ca/papers in pdf/88burden.pdf
Fallacy: Burden of Proof
Scientific method - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[razeontherock]

I'll recite:
Burden of proof. I suggest you read up on it.

I "suggest" you learn to recognize when someone is making a claim that intends to be proof, and when they don't.

 

[Elendur]

I "suggest" you learn to recognize when someone is making a claim that intends to be proof, and when they don't.

Since when can a claim ever be proof?

 

[JoeyArnold]

Since when can a claim ever be proof?

Can you prove gravity?

 

[Nabobalis]

Since when can a claim ever be proof?

It is if you are a creationist

 

[Nabobalis]

Can you prove gravity?

We can show that gravity exists and right now is very well explained by general relativity.

 

[JoeyArnold]

We can show that gravity exists and right now is very well explained by general relativity.

We assume gravity but have never found it.

 

[Elendur]

We assume gravity but have never found it.

We don't need to assume gravity to observe its effects.

 

[JoeyArnold]

We don't need to assume gravity to observe its effects.

Why should I believe you if you lost your pet gravity in your room?

 

[Elendur]

Why should I believe you if you lost your pet gravity in your room?

Because I would be able to strengthen that with evidence.

 

[JoeyArnold]

Because I would be able to strengthen that with evidence.

I cannot see your pet gravity.