• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

When does NO mean No?

Is it rape if

  • No means no, he should stop

  • yes it's wrong, but not illegal

  • depends on her reason for asking him to stop

  • You can't stop a freight train once it's started


Results are only viewable after voting.

Ledifni

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2004
3,464
199
44
✟4,590.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Chajara said:
Well, don't men have a "point of no return" thing with [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]? Like, once they get to a certain point they are going to [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] if a freight train comes crashing through the wall? But then, I'd say if you haven't made your mind up by that point then you really have no justification for complaining when the guy keeps going for a few seconds after you cry foul, and then has no clue what you're talking about when you yell at him for raping you because he was so close to [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] he didn't even hear you. :p

There ain't no such thing as a point where you can't pull out. If you're already past the point of no return, you better have some Kleenex handy... or an understanding girlfriend.
 
Upvote 0

loriersea

Well-Known Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,216
231
48
Detroit, MI
Visit site
✟26,071.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm going against the grain here, but I don't think it's rape in that case. It's inconsiderate and probably morally wrong, but it's not rape.

In general, consent doesn't work on a moment-to-moment basis. If, for example, I consent to a medical procedure, I can't change my mind halfway through. Or, I can change my mind, but they don't have to stop the procedure, because I already gave my consent. That doesn't mean that, before the procedure, I can't change my mind, but once the surgery is underway, my consent is binding.

I think it's the same here, in a less rigid way. A woman is a competant moral agent, who is fully capable of consenting or not consenting to sexual acts. If she consents to a sexual act, she does so with full knowledge of what it will entail. I don't think she should be allowed to just change her mind halfway through and then hold the man legally responsible. That is saying that women are not competant moral agents, equipped with the forethought to make rational decisions.

Now, if the sex act turned into something she did not consent to--if the man tries to initiate anal sex, or S&M, or something she hadn't consented to--then I do think we are talking about rape. Just as, if you consented to your doctor doing a D&C and they gave you a hysterectomy, you'd have very good grounds for suing them.

But, if you consent to sex, and the act has your full consent when it begins, then I don't think changing your mind halfway through but the man not stopping would constitute rape.
 
Upvote 0

qpmomma

The Internet Elf
Nov 4, 2005
702
39
41
Indiana
✟23,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Solomon Kane said:
I have to go with no means no.

Although, I would wonder at the type of person who decides to stop after penetration has occured.

SEVERAL reasons! If the girl was assulted in the past and she has a flashback and freaks out, NO MEANS NO!

Christina
 
Upvote 0